[AntonioLao]

Hydrogen bonding is not a completely electrostatic interaction between electronegative atoms or molecules (some degrees of electrodynamics exist). However, it is a strong dipole-dipole attraction caused by their electron-deficit. For example between hydrogen ion or bare proton (H+) and hydroxide ion (OH-) forming water molecule H2O. This semi-static property allows the macroscopic thermal phenomena of fluidity as a distinctive attribute for all liquid phase of any substance. Therefore, if there is no electron deficit then hydrogen bond could never have existed either.

This electron deficit raises the question of their whereabouts and seems to indicate an imbalance of localized electric charge configuration. Electric polarity creates two distinct ionic structures: electronegativity and electropositivity. Metals are usually electronegative and nonmetals are electronegative. There are also metalloids having intermediate properties. One mystery in the study of chemistry is why among stable elements there are more metals than nonmetals and why life is almost exclusively composed of nonmetals and metalloids? If the values of relative electronegativity are a measure of chemical attraction for the shared electrons among chemical bonds then smaller values indicate metals and higher values indicate nonmetals. However, rounding these values to the nearest whole numbers they would simply suggest that metals give one unit of electronegativity, metalloids 2 and 3 units, and nonmetals give 4 but no values of 5 or more exist.

Using these whole numbers: 1, 2, 3, and 4, both hydrogen and nitrogen can be considered as metalloids, 2 for hydrogen and 3 for nitrogen. If some of the hydrogen bonds in the DNA molecules, proteins, and amino acids were replaced by nitrogen bonds then a life without hydrogen bonds is a life that could possibly last forever.

[mkirkpatrick]

You have opened the door to some very interesting aspects of bonding and like attractiveness,it is no chance thing that the H factor seems the most abundant!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick the H factor seems the most abundant

H factor more than being plentiful, it is also the beginning of everything. Furthermore, it could become the end of everything if and only if proton will decay into a lepton as believed by theories of supersymmetry. To understand why this isn't possible is to understand its relationship to the import of Schwarz inequality, upcoming thread in the math forum.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao H factor more than being plentiful, it is also the beginning of everything. Furthermore, it could become the end of everything if and only if proton will decay into a lepton as believed by theories of supersymmetry. To understand why this isn't possible is to understand its relationship to the import of Schwarz inequality, upcoming thread in the math forum.

I understand,then H could stand for (w)hole?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick H could stand for (w)hole

From chemistry's pov, H is the letter symbol for hydrogen. From the point of view of a physical theory, H stands for helix. In the biology of life's origin, H2 stands for double helix structures of DNA. From plasma physics pov, it stands for magnetic helicities. All represent whole of something but this something is a double of square of energy H+ and H-.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao From chemistry's pov, H is the letter symbol for hydrogen. From the point of view of a physical theory, H stands for helix. In the biology of life's origin, H2 stands for double helix structures of DNA. From plasma physics pov, it stands for magnetic helicities. All represent whole of something but this something is a double of square of energy H+ and H-.

H+ and H- complete the relative requirements to enable form to become stable?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick enable form to become stable

Stabler than yin yang supersymmetry. On the other hand, the proton is made of 2 up quarks and 1 down quark and the up quark is made of 5H+ and 1H- while the down quark is made of 3H- and 1H+.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Stabler than yin yang supersymmetry. On the other hand, the proton is made of 2 up quarks and 1 down quark and the up quark is made of 5H+ and 1H- while the down quark is made of 3H- and 1H+.

That's outstanding Antonio,I had not realized that it were even possible to be "more
stable than Ying and Yang,I learn something fresh each day! Wonderful.



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick that it were even possible to be "more stable than Ying and Yang,

Bear in mind, that this is a dynamic stability and not a static one. Therefore, the MIND must be dynamic localized uniform absolute motion itself.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Bear in mind, that this is a dynamic stability and not a static one. Therefore, the MIND must be dynamic localized uniform absolute motion itself.

Right,I see what you mean my friend,thanks.



regards michael.