Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | proximity in human affairs -
01-30-2008, 02:23 PM
Before the science of telecommunications the interactions in all human relationships were accomplished by the principle of proximity. Today, humans still acknowledge camaraderie by simply the act of shaking hands. This is often seen between politicians no matter what party they belong to. Many believe that to every person there is a soul mate and true happiness comes only when the two got together. Some will be searching for their soul mates for the rest of their lives. The lucky ones will succeed and be blessed forever. On the other hand, if the soul mate can be found within oneself then there is no need to search beyond the confine of one’s consciousness.
In the abstract plane, a soul mate is simply the distinction between positive consciousness and negative consciousness. They cannot completely merge but they each rules a semicircle of a whole unit circle. They can be diametrically opposite but also complementary as well as supplementary. Since the technological advancement of the telephone and cell phones, all these efforts of searching for each personal soul mate seem unnecessary. However, similar to jigsaw puzzles, only the correct pieces will ever fit together. This fully completed puzzle is simply the quantum vacuum itself.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
|  | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 |  Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-30-2008, 05:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Before the science of telecommunications the interactions in all human relationships were accomplished by the principle of proximity. Today, humans still acknowledge camaraderie by simply the act of shaking hands. This is often seen between politicians no matter what party they belong to. Many believe that to every person there is a soul mate and true happiness comes only when the two got together. Some will be searching for their soul mates for the rest of their lives. The lucky ones will succeed and be blessed forever. On the other hand, if the soul mate can be found within oneself then there is no need to search beyond the confine of one’s consciousness.
In the abstract plane, a soul mate is simply the distinction between positive consciousness and negative consciousness. They cannot completely merge but they each rules a semicircle of a whole unit circle. They can be diametrically opposite but also complementary as well as supplementary. Since the technological advancement of the telephone and cell phones, all these efforts of searching for each personal soul mate seem unnecessary. However, similar to jigsaw puzzles, only the correct pieces will ever fit together. This fully completed puzzle is simply the quantum vacuum itself. |
Several times i have thought i had found my soul mate,only to be proved wrong! This time I am keeping an open mind,maybe the vacuum will exhaust itself?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 01:23 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick maybe the vacuum will exhaust itself | An H+ of the vacuum would be reluctant to let go an H-, vice versa. Together H+H- become a electron neutrino.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao An H+ of the vacuum would be reluctant to let go an H-, vice versa. Together H+H- become a electron neutrino. |
We can but live in hope my friend!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:20 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick We can but live in hope my friend | However, theoretically, we could extract vacuum energy by processes involving 1/3 or 2/3 or any multiples of 6's of H+ and H-.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao However, theoretically, we could extract vacuum energy by processes involving 1/3 or 2/3 or any multiples of 6's of H+ and H-. | Well there you go,a theory to the rescue!
regards michael
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:30 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick a theory to the rescue | The theory is no good unless it works. I'm hoping it is the cold fusion that we are talking about so much that nobody is expected to believe in it anymore.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The theory is no good unless it works. I'm hoping it is the cold fusion that we are talking about so much that nobody is expected to believe in it anymore. |
I certainly believe in cold-fusion and i am certain that it will be realised before too long.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | The Following User Says Thank You to mkirkpatrick For This Useful Post: | | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:42 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick before too long | Before infinity? This was bothersome until Georg Cantor proved the existence of transfinite numbers. However, he became insane at the end.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: proximity in human affairs -
01-31-2008, 02:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Before infinity? This was bothersome until Georg Cantor proved the existence of transfinite numbers. However, he became insane at the end. |
Thats what happens when you become obsessed to the point of singularity,it leads to
desparity,or even madness.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | |
