LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksIs that introspection or circumspection?
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 31 to 40 of 40
Thread: Darwin 200
- 02-14-2009, 06:04 PM #31Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,772
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: Darwin 200
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-14-2009, 06:07 PM #32Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,614
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 294
- Thanked 894x in 723 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: Darwin 200 
Originally Posted by AntonioLao 
The former would fit!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-14-2009, 06:09 PM #33Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,772
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: Darwin 200
The surface of a Klein bottle does not allow either of these inspections.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-14-2009, 06:13 PM #34Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,614
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 294
- Thanked 894x in 723 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: Darwin 200 Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Well then we will have to cancel the inspector?
regards michaelHumilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-14-2009, 06:19 PM #35Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,772
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: Darwin 200
Yet we can travel along happily and absent mindedly on Moebius highway forever as exactly 8 directional invariance.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-14-2009, 06:26 PM #36Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,614
- Blog Entries
- 5
- Thanks Given
- 294
- Thanked 894x in 723 Posts
- Rep Power
- 154
Re: Darwin 200 Dear old Mobius,where would we be without him? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-15-2009, 10:32 AM #37Grandmaster
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 5,672
- Thanks Given
- 2,208
- Thanked 1,887x in 1,203 Posts
- Rep Power
- 104
Re: Darwin 200
Hi Antonio....I think apes are apes and humans are humans, however the idea of a "missing link" contributes well to confusing the masses... Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Darwin's cousin first coined the word "eugenics" and helped to move the eugenic philosophy of thought into society.
Darwin's grandfather Erasmus was a proponent of the concept of evolution, also a radical humanist. An industrialist fervent to move corporatism and globalism into the world.
Darwin was not a scientist, in fact failed medicine and studied for a degree in divinity. (James Moore and Adrian Desmond.)
Darwin mentioned in his writings "supporting the agenda"...the agenda being a collapse of religion and belief in a God the creator...so destruction of societal traditions and values to further as Bertrand Russel spoke of as "the scientific experience." That would not have been possible without the creation of a theory of evolution.
Most everything that has happened has a reason to happen...it takes examining history to understand changes that present themselves as the present....
Mikal
- 02-16-2009, 02:45 AM #38Grandmaster
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,902
- Blog Entries
- 28
- Thanks Given
- 1,780
- Thanked 3,988x in 2,766 Posts
- Rep Power
- 181
Re: Darwin 200
Darwin was not his cousin or his father, who may have been loonies. Wallace also come upon the facts of evolution, as would have others. It was not a conspiracy, but a search for truth. It would have been worse to falsely try to save the notion of God. Actually, Darwin did kind of hold back, at first. One need not be a scientist to discover things. His findings were indeed contrary to his theology training.
There is some more about Darwin in the 'Evolution ?' thread and he is also the topic of several magazines lately.
- 02-17-2009, 11:56 AM #39Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,772
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Re: Darwin 200
If these changes were analogous to the infinite degrees of freedom that the 8 directional invariance can point or rotate then the 4 bases of genes can well describe just 4 directional invariance leaving 4 more unaccounted for. The formers could be the DNAs and latter RNAs. Originally Posted by Mikal Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 04-03-2012, 11:07 PM #40Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- Australia
- Posts
- 4,896
- Blog Entries
- 24
- Thanks Given
- 2,967
- Thanked 2,726x in 1,669 Posts
- Rep Power
- 92
Re: Darwin 200
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I can give one ..... what is it you want to know ?
greg'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
