Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39

Thread: Darwin 200

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Darwin 200


    Darwin, father of the theory of evolution of life on planet Earth, was born February 12, 1809, 200 hundred years and a day ago. He died April 19, 1882. The dynamics of his theory is based on two equivalent biological processes: (1) natural selection and (2) survival of the fittest. However, his theory was formulated at a period of human history where and when there was no concept of DNA molecules or the genetic codes. Nonetheless, both can be shown to share a common pattern of existence.

    The discovery of the double helix structures and the pairing of 4 genetic bases attested to the elementary mathematical patterns of 4 pairs of yin-yang quantum spacetime structures. These denote squares of energy of the quantum vacuum fluctuations. Furthermore, the dynamics of a theory of quantum spacetime can be described simply by pairs of 2 by 2 Hadamard matrices embedded in a sieve of Diophantus containing a pair of distinct fundamental building blocks of whole numbers without unity. Therefore, at the infinitesimal level of quantum spacetime, Hadamard pairs are equivalent to the genetic base pairs of macroscopic molecular biology.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    6th degree Black Belt Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    997
    Blog Entries
    25
    Thanks Given
    111
    Thanked 48x in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    37

    Re: Darwin 200

    Hi Antonio, probably this is not the right forum, but, you have mentioned the sieve of Diophantus in many of your recent posts. Can you tell what is it, or provide a link, I did try google and wiki, but couldn't find anything relevant.


  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Darwin 200

    Biology is classified as the science of plants and animals or botany and zoology and Darwin is the father of how these two distinct classes of life evolve. On the other hand, Darwin did not provide a mathematical foundation but purely observational foundation. However, modern science of genetics can provide the chemical links of DNA molecules of simply 4 base pairs. I'm simply connecting them to a purely new mathematics of an infinitely ordered matrix which I called a sieve of Diophantus. This is an original formulation and I hope to publish it in the journal of mathematics. Further discussion of this new mathematics would require a one to one seminar or workshop symposium between the two of us.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: Darwin 200

    It seems that Darwin set of a chain of thinking where we are each exploring the links?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Darwin 200

    No one has yet given any plausible explanation of the missing link between human and ape.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: Darwin 200

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    No one has yet given any plausible explanation of the missing link between human and ape.
    Maybe that's because there is'nt one!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Darwin 200

    If there isn't then the logical conclusion is that human did not evolved from the ape. Both DNAs were already determined at the beginning.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: Darwin 200

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If there isn't then the logical conclusion is that human did not evolved from the ape. Both DNAs were already determined at the beginning.
    That could be so! If there indeed is a "missing link" why the hell hav'nt they found it,in the ageless wisdom an avatar
    from Siries came to earth 18 million years ago and left a
    portion of itself here,and we came from that,became self aware.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Darwin 200

    But human fossils dated no more than 2 millions years.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: Darwin 200

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But human fossils dated no more than 2 millions years.
    Maybe that's because they had not been discovered yet,
    or where they lived is now Antartica or even beneath the
    ocean.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top