where life began

[AntonioLao]

There is still no completely convincing answer to the question: “What is life?” Scientists from different disciplines most likely give different answers. But those people who called themselves biologists would certainly have much more to say since what they study is life itself, both plants and animals. However, although plants and animals share the same genetic bases, there is no proof that animals can ever evolve from plants or vice versa plants evolved from animals. These two-way missing links remain a mystery of biology.

On the other hand, physicists would say that the fusing links of life are the hydrogen bonds. These molecular bonds hold the phosphate backbones with the complex sugars of each DNA molecule. The resulting structure is called a double helix, which can be observed by x-ray crystallography. In the final analysis, scientists agree that the supports of life are the protein molecules (biomass), while complex sugar molecules produce the necessary bio-energy for bodily functions. Unfortunately, the internal constitution of animals is unable to produce either protein or sugar, while plants can produce them abundantly. Human beings being at the top of the food chain depend on lower animals and edible plants for food. Although human beings are omnivorous, many other animals, for example, horses and cattle are herbivorous. When cattle are accidently fed with meat products eating them causes Mad Cow disease, which can be fatal to the people contracted it. This is another missing link of the animal kingdom: between carnivorous and herbivorous. Although there are only four genetic bases, the genetic codes of each living species by mathematical combinations and permutations of these four bases give an infinite number of possibility. Consequently, the randomness of the evolutionary process would exhaust infinite interval of time simply to produce the minute distinctive genetic differences between ape and human.

[mkirkpatrick]

I personally feel that life is eternal and therefore had no beginning and will also have no ending.


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

I personally feel that spiritual life is eternal and therefore had no beginning and will also have no ending. I personally feel that physical life is not eternal and therefore had a beginning and will also have an ending.

[mkirkpatrick]

I personally feel that spiritual life is eternal and therefore had no beginning and will also have no ending. I personally feel that physical life is not eternal and therefore had a beginning and will also have an ending.

Yes that's right,physical life is relative and therefore temporal by nature,spiritual life is eternal and absolute and is and transcends alpha and omega.

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

But physical life and spiritual life can co-exist as body and soul. The problem arise where and when a body has no soul or a soul has no body. The former is called the physical death, the latter is called the spiritual death.

[mkirkpatrick]

But physical life and spiritual life can co-exist as body and soul. The problem arise where and when a body has no soul or a soul has no body. The former is called the physical death, the latter is called the spiritual death.

Yes death is just another word for change,we change one body for another and continue with our journey of unfoldment.

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

But if one suffers the second death then both body and soul are truly gone and no chance of suffering a third death. This indicate a double jeopardy as one traverses the Mobius topology.

[mkirkpatrick]

But if one suffers the second death then both body and soul are truly gone and no chance of suffering a third death. This indicate a double jeopardy as one traverses the Mobius topology.

I trust Mobius to see that all is well on it's transportation strip between life physical and life spiritual.

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Many still don't understand why, where, and when Life ends as a process of natural extinction.

[Graybeard]

There is still no completely convincing answer to the question: “What is life?” Scientists from different disciplines most likely give different answers. But those people who called themselves biologists would certainly have much more to say since what they study is life itself, both plants and animals. However, although plants and animals share the same genetic bases, there is no proof that animals can ever evolve from plants or vice versa plants evolved from animals. These two-way missing links remain a mystery of biology.

Sigh .... sigh ... sigh .... Dear Antonio .. for the first time ever I have to disagree with you.

On the other hand, physicists would say that the fusing links of life are the hydrogen bonds. These molecular bonds hold the phosphate backbones with the complex sugars of each DNA molecule. The resulting structure is called a double helix, which can be observed by x-ray crystallography. In the final analysis, scientists agree that the supports of life are the protein molecules (biomass), while complex sugar molecules produce the necessary bio-energy for bodily functions. Unfortunately, the internal constitution of animals is unable to produce either protein or sugar, while plants can produce them abundantly. Human beings being at the top of the food chain depend on lower animals and edible plants for food. Although human beings are omnivorous, many other animals, for example, horses and cattle are herbivorous. When cattle are accidently fed with meat products eating them causes Mad Cow disease, which can be fatal to the people contracted it. This is another missing link of the animal kingdom: between carnivorous and herbivorous. Although there are only four genetic bases, the genetic codes of each living species by mathematical combinations and permutations of these four bases give an infinite number of possibility. Consequently, the randomness of the evolutionary process would exhaust infinite interval of time simply to produce the minute distinctive genetic differences between ape and human.

OMG ..... now I have disagreed with you twice ... and both times in the one post.

cool bananas ... greg