Sometimes, Dawkins would ask himself this question: How dumb a person would have to be to believe God exists? Who is dumber the dumb who believes God exists or the dumb who believes no God exists?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
So many paths to the same destination,
would, but I could, experience them all...
AntonioLao (02-11-2012)
Not a direct reference but one from the two atheists who live in the same house I'm sharing. He kept referring that Dawkins said believing God exists is a form of intellectual dishonesty, implying that truly intelligent people (ones who use and understand the scientific method) would never believe that God exists. The opposite of intelligence are the dumb people who could believe in anything. I looked thru most of Dawkins books and I can testify that Dawkins never use mathematics for his arguments. He is a behavioral scientist who is more interested in action and reaction of human interactions.Originally Posted by labelwench
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)