Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011
Results 101 to 106 of 106
  1. #101
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,614
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 894x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology of blood circulation

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If he is a lonely egocentric he might read all his emails to prove to himself that he is still the center of collective consciousness.
    Yes he may well do that very thing.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  2. #102
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: topology of blood circulation

    Sometimes, Dawkins would ask himself this question: How dumb a person would have to be to believe God exists? Who is dumber the dumb who believes God exists or the dumb who believes no God exists?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #103
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,614
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 894x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology of blood circulation

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Sometimes, Dawkins would ask himself this question: How dumb a person would have to be to believe God exists? Who is dumber the dumb who believes God exists or the dumb who believes no God exists?
    Personally I prefer to believe and accept that a God or force for Good exists within this universe.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #104
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7,463
    Blog Entries
    14
    Thanks Given
    7,113
    Thanked 7,356x in 4,786 Posts
    Rep Power
    95

    Re: topology of blood circulation

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Sometimes, Dawkins would ask himself this question: How dumb a person would have to be to believe God exists? Who is dumber the dumb who believes God exists or the dumb who believes no God exists?
    Do you have a reference by Dawkins for this statement?
    So many paths to the same destination,
    would, but I could, experience them all...

  5. #105
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7,463
    Blog Entries
    14
    Thanks Given
    7,113
    Thanked 7,356x in 4,786 Posts
    Rep Power
    95

    Re: topology of blood circulation

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick View Post
    Personally I prefer to believe and accept that a God or force for Good exists within this universe.

    regards michael.
    It is generally accepted that God can neither be proven nor disproved to exist within this universe.

    That 'belief' in God exists is not in question.

    The believer IS his/her own reference in this regard.
    So many paths to the same destination,
    would, but I could, experience them all...

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to labelwench For This Useful Post:

    AntonioLao (02-11-2012)

  7. #106
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,772
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: topology of blood circulation

    Quote Originally Posted by labelwench
    Do you have a reference by Dawkins for this statement?
    Not a direct reference but one from the two atheists who live in the same house I'm sharing. He kept referring that Dawkins said believing God exists is a form of intellectual dishonesty, implying that truly intelligent people (ones who use and understand the scientific method) would never believe that God exists. The opposite of intelligence are the dumb people who could believe in anything. I looked thru most of Dawkins books and I can testify that Dawkins never use mathematics for his arguments. He is a behavioral scientist who is more interested in action and reaction of human interactions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 11 of 11 FirstFirst ... 7891011

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top