God( es ) Is Pregnant

[Rybo]

Equanimity between IN, OUT and AROUND = 12-around-1.

12-around-1 = the Vector Equilibrium aka nucleated cubo-octahedron.

12-around-1 = 4 Great Subdivided Hexagonal Planes

12-around-1 = 8 triangles and 6 squares = 14 polygons = asymmetry

12-around-1 = 24 chords around and 24 radii inward/outward

.."Vector Equlibrium( VE ) is closet we will ever come to knowing God"...R.B.Fuller

When the nuclear one is born out of the oven/womb, the asymmetrical, non-stable VE system infolds( cntracts and torques ) to a quasi-existent( superificial ) expression of the regular/symmetrical and stable icosahedron( phi/5 ) ---see ultra-micro gravity---

VE = Great Momma aka God( es )

Icosahedron( regular/stable ) = Goddess( female)

Pentagonal Dodecahedron( regular/unstable ) = male
..{ see 5 cubes/blockheads }....

Octahedron(regular/stable ) = molecular existince( combinations of electrons as chemistry )

Tetrahedron( regular/stable ) = hadronic nucleus and subatomic particles.
-----------------------------------------------

I think I've shown with some clarity in past, that the Synergetics Vector Equlibrium aka cubo-octahedron or 12-around-1 sphericals of equal radius that define 4 equatorial hexagons and each subdivided by 6 equilateral triangles ergo total of 24 equilateral triangles, that infold into a double-bonded double sine-wave topology the exact same as the EM-Radiations( photon ).

I think I've also shown how this double set of sine-waves ---4 sets of two triangles--- also is basic plan for quadra-peditic-like mammals and other non-mammailiar animals.

So, if and when, the finite physical Universe was to ever reach this state of maximum entropy, we still have integrated set nodal vertexial events, and relationships between them.








Rybo

[mkirkpatrick]

You could be onto something here rybo.then again.....



regards michael.

[Rybo]

You could be onto something here rybo.then again.....regards michael.

Ha ha, yeah michael, its that "then again" that few others have the intellectual proclivities to counter with any common, rational, logical sense arguments to my ideas/scenarios etc.....

Occasionally I find some one has the intellect and is paying attention enough to correct my errors in my evidence or logic but that is very rare find on the net...

Please come back when you can put together your thought to finish your "then again" sentence.

The truth is out there, for those who choose, to put out the effort to find absolute and relative truths and the intellect to know the differrence.

Rybo

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks rybo,are you saying that you have made errors then? If you know that why not correct them yourself?Maybe the rest of us have not the itellect to follow your post,as I said in another post rybo do you really talk the way you post? I am not meaning to be rude or finding fault,it is a genuine question.


regards michael.

[Rybo]

[QUOTE]

Thanks rybo,are you saying that you have made errors then?

Yes many over the yrs.

If you know that why not correct them yourself?

Michael, you don't seem to understand that other people can find some one error in logical scenarios and show them. If someone shows us our error, then we know.

Sometimes I have found my own errors of my logical scenarios.

In both cases I have fixed tho you seem to imply/infer that I have not only not fixed that I would refuse to do so. Why you would infer/or imply this does not make sense to me.

Maybe the rest of us have not the intellect to follow your post,

Well, I know you had trouble with my addition of 1 + 1 as to complex of a formula.

That does mean you or others, do not have the the intellect to sometimes follow my logical lines of thought. It just means that few have shown little of such intellect or effort to understand.

as I said in another post rybo do you really talk the way you post?I am not meaning to be rude or finding fault,it is a genuine question.

And did I give a reply Michael? I probably did. When we type we have take more time to develop our thoughts.

Depending on what, and who I'm talking too, we all do and do not speak, the way we express our thoughts. This forum is about TOQE. I'm not part of speaking forum about TOQE, if i was then I would speak the way I talk to some degree....

This does not seem strange to me, that all of us are similar in that way. Rybo

[Drifter]

Equanimity between IN, OUT and AROUND = 12-around-1.

12-around-1 = the Vector Equilibrium aka nucleated cubo-octahedron.

12-around-1 = 4 Great Subdivided Hexagonal Planes

12-around-1 = 8 triangles and 6 squares = 14 polygons = asymmetry

12-around-1 = 24 chords around and 24 radii inward/outward

.."Vector Equlibrium( VE ) is closet we will ever come to knowing God"...R.B.Fuller

When the nuclear one is born out of the oven/womb, the asymmetrical, non-stable VE system infolds( cntracts and torques ) to a quasi-existent( superificial ) expression of the regular/symmetrical and stable icosahedron( phi/5 ) ---see ultra-micro gravity---

VE = Great Momma aka God( es )

Icosahedron( regular/stable ) = Goddess( female)

Pentagonal Dodecahedron( regular/unstable ) = male
..{ see 5 cubes/blockheads }....

Octahedron(regular/stable ) = molecular existince( combinations of electrons as chemistry )

Tetrahedron( regular/stable ) = hadronic nucleus and subatomic particles.
-----------------------------------------------

I think I've shown with some clarity in past, that the Synergetics Vector Equlibrium aka cubo-octahedron or 12-around-1 sphericals of equal radius that define 4 equatorial hexagons and each subdivided by 6 equilateral triangles ergo total of 24 equilateral triangles, that infold into a double-bonded double sine-wave topology the exact same as the EM-Radiations( photon ).

I think I've also shown how this double set of sine-waves ---4 sets of two triangles--- also is basic plan for quadra-peditic-like mammals and other non-mammailiar animals.

So, if and when, the finite physical Universe was to ever reach this state of maximum entropy, we still have integrated set nodal vertexial events, and relationships between them.
Rybo

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...ajC1hvAPd-FgMw
Spiritual Fire alone makes of man a divine and perfect entity. Now' what is that "Spiritual Fire"? In alchemy it is HYDROGEN, in general; while in esoteric ...

[Drifter]

Ha ha, yeah michael, its that "then again" that few others have the intellectual proclivities to counter with any common, rational, logical sense arguments to my ideas/scenarios etc.....

Occasionally I find some one has the intellect and is paying attention enough to correct my errors in my evidence or logic but that is very rare find on the net...

Please come back when you can put together your thought to finish your "then again" sentence.

The truth is out there, for those who choose, to put out the effort to find absolute and relative truths and the intellect to know the differrence.

Rybo

The Final Point is the Observer Effect
The observer effect means that unless and until the moment of observation the universe exists only as a possibility. Until you observe it, in other words without a conscious sentient being, the universe doesn’t exist. This is John Wheeler’s contribution.

Wheeler was a student of Einstein; he is now 93 years old. He is one of the greatest giants of physics of the last century. He says that the universe remains ambiguous, a ceaselessly flowing quantum soup, until a conscious being observes it. The conscious being could be a honeybee or a chameleon, or it could be you. That without consciousness the universe does not manufacture itself into physical form.

The points I have discussed above are the qualities of your soul. Why? Because your soul is not a thing; it is a field of infinite possibilities. Your soul is omniscient, your soul proliferates and embraces uncertainty in order to create, and your soul is co-creating with God. God remains unmanifest unless you participate.

What is the definition of a soul? The soul is the observer that interprets and makes choices. If you want to expand it a little bit, say it interprets through memory and makes choices through desire. The five soul attributes are:

1. Field of infinite possibilities
2. Omniscient (or correlates non-locally)
3. Embraces uncertainty
4. Infinite source of creativity
5. Co-creates with God and co-creates with the mystery

Everyone has an observer; everyone is observing based on memory and interpretation and is making choices based on desire; and everyone has that common ground which is infinite possibilities, non-local correlations, uncertainty, procreation and creativity. That’s what the soul is.

What is the Difference Between the Soul and the Mind?
The mind is the process of observation. The soul is the observer. What is the physical reality including that of the body? It’s the object of observation. You observe through your mind and you observe the body and you observe other bodies. But remember that other bodies and everything else that you observe are a translation of bodily processes in your own self by your nervous system.

So when I observe you out there, actually I am observing bodily processes in my mind that I interpret as you. So everything happens in our body, mind and soul. The observer is the soul, the process is the mind, and the physical body is the object.

http://www.redicecreations.com/speci...tistsoul2.html

[Drifter]

[QUOTE=Rybo;150802]

Yes many over the yrs.

Michael, you don't seem to understand that other people can find some one error in logical scenarios and show them. If someone shows us our error, then we know.

Sometimes I have found my own errors of my logical scenarios.

In both cases I have fixed tho you seem to imply/infer that I have not only not fixed that I would refuse to do so. Why you would infer/or imply this does not make sense to me.


Well, I know you had trouble with my addition of 1 + 1 as to complex of a formula.

That does mean you or others, do not have the the intellect to sometimes follow my logical lines of thought. It just means that few have shown little of such intellect or effort to understand.



And did I give a reply Michael? I probably did. When we type we have take more time to develop our thoughts.

Depending on what, and who I'm talking too, we all do and do not speak, the way we express our thoughts. This forum is about TOQE. I'm not part of speaking forum about TOQE, if i was then I would speak the way I talk to some degree....

This does not seem strange to me, that all of us are similar in that way. Rybo

Anima:
The ability to perceive the infinitely small, including subatomic particles was claimed by the Nath Siddhas who had progressed to such a stage in their meditation that they realized, as Gopi Krishna has put it, that “it is not matter but consciousness that is the ultimate reality of the universe.” (Hidden Secrets of Kundalini (in Panchastavi).) When the tantric adept has progressed to a certain stage, he can see the adult in a child and vice-versa, which is to say, he can watch another being born, living, and dying, with one and the same glance at the same moment in eternity.
Those who have studied themselves in a mirror while under the influence of LSD and certain other psychotropic substances may have experienced a similar phenomenon, which is to say the death of the physical body.
It is precisely as the opium-smoking Jean Cocteau expressed it: “Mirrors are the doors through which Death comes and goes.” (This thought is personified in his film of Orpheus, which is recommended to you, and of which Steven H. Scheuer has remarked, in his Movies on TV, “Defies anything else in cinema.” — A magical work.”
The Nath Siddha can “see microscopically” because he has advanced to the state where he can reduce all of Nature to its starting point: nothing, zilch, zero, nada. Only self-organizing principles and a holographic universe could bring such order into being.
An understanding of the tantric-alchemical-hermetic formulae of “As above, so below”, will help. It is only necessary to take to its logical conclusions the concept of the linga-sharira to make sense of such numinosites. The Linga-Sharira is the equivalent of DNA. How can something like left-handedness, to use a rather obvious example, be passed on from parents to children? But this is only a physical characteristic! It is a fortiori, all the more marvelous that certain ethical precepts and tendencies of mind can be passed genetically as well. As Danielou points out (While the Gods play. Shaiva Oracles and Predictions on the Cycles of History and the Destiny of Mankind), the Linga-Sbarira helps produce an individual who:
“…carries out the role that nature has given him [and who] degrades himself if he abandons that role. The perfect man, the harmonious man, the useful man, is the man who, like an actor, plays to perfection the role assigned to him.”
It seems to me I have heard this elsewhere — perhaps Liber AL vel Legis (or The Book of the Law). In the comment to Chapter One of that work, Crowley states that once the individual becomes conscious “of his true, inmost will, of his essential nature,” any act, which expresses the soul, that act and no other is right.”
Both this siddhi and, to some extent, the next, are governed by the Ajna-chakra
Here is a true story from an initiated Nath, whom we shall call Vimalanatha, a criminal defense lawyer by profession, who applied this and other siddhis in an eclectic working recently and sent us a letter describing the results:
“I recently handled a criminal defense in which the charge was aggravated sexual assault, which is the legal ‘umbrella’ term for several varieties of rape. I did not think the State could prove its case, as the complainant lied repeatedly in her statement to police, and if she changed any part of her story on the stand. I would have the earlier statement to impeach her. I knew some things that the prosecutor probably did not, for example, that the complainant now worked as a waitress in a beer bar where a lot of drugs were being sold.
“I had had excellent results in prior workings using the voodoo rituals formulated by the Semi-legendary Anna Riva and other New Orleans practitioners, and I knew that, where legal matters are concerned, one only has to call upon one of the loas, Agwé, to work one’s will. I drew the loa’s veve on a piece of parchment and meditated— or, rather, concentrated —on it, using that state of meditation known as dharana, or single-pointed fixation of mind, during which time I visualized the complainant's purse. I found that I was able to make myself extremely small. I was thus able to climb down into the purse, where I found a packet of cocaine.”
Obviously, the Sorcerer was putting both anima and, as we shall see, prapti, to good advantage. Voudoo makes use of many of the siddhis, and so it is not unusual to find modem Shaivite sadhakas becoming interested in such an Afro-American religion. We can add only that it is characteristic of dharana that its masters are said to be in control of what Goswami calls —”Superconsciousness”:
“Superknowledge arises from concentration—not from perception and intellection. Superknowledge has two levels —inward and outward. At the outward level, Superknowledge reveals the supermatter field, and thus the range of knowledge is increased to a very high degree...
(Goswami. 1980.) This 'supermatter field' is the Net as well as the many-realities world on both sides of the “holes” in the fabric.

Only in the mind of the Mystic!?
http://www.ashejournal.com/two/sahaj1.shtml

[Drifter]

http://meditationexpert.com/comparat...guru_nanak.htm

[Rybo]

Spiritual Fire alone makes of man a divine and perfect entity. Now' what is that "Spiritual Fire"? In alchemy it is HYDROGEN, in general; while in esoteric ...

Sorry Drifter, I don't see much to anything here related to my post.....maybe the word man.

When you have something please share....I need a good intellectually challenging ---and hopefully valid--- critique of my thoughts and their hard to come by out here on the net....

Rybo