What is spirit,can we become mindful of it.

[melanie]

A mysterious red rain fell across the southern Indian State
of Kerala, starting on July 25th, 2001 over a period of two
months.

The striking red coloration of the rainwater was found to
be due to the suspension of microscopic red particles, having
the appearance of biological cells. An electron microscopic
study of the red particles showed fine cell structure and that
the major elements present in these cell-like particles were
carbon and oxygen.
Linked below is a clip from the BBC documentary, 'We Are
the Aliens,' from their Horizon Science series. Also included
is part of a 2006 scientific paper about the particles,
including an electron photograph of the algae-like "cells."
Scientists, Godfrey Louis and A. Santhosh Kumar suspect a
link between a meteor airburst event that preceded the red
rain - and the possibility of an extraterrestrial origin for these
particles from cometary fragments...

Video:
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/page/445.html

kind regards (and Purple Rain lol)
d.

What about the red rain?

[Drifter]

What about the red rain?

Science says we (humans) evolved from such algae, hypothetically?
Mixed with other (junk)DNA?
Possibly have a reaction?

[Rybo]

Many thanks Rybo"'we' within" meaning whom, what exactly??
Consciousness arises upon sensation-stimulationTill then the Is-ness of "'we' within", a priori (I-Am) and singular but universal and flowing, no? See "tubes" below...
http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/page/445.html kind regards (and Purple Rain lol)
d.

Hi Drifter, and your welcome. "we" is specifically human but inclusive of all of our finite physical/spirit/energy --aka occupied space--- universe, is the tubes. Between the tubes, ergo beyond the finite physical, is micro-infinite true nothingness ---aka non-occupied space--- and this non-occupied space extends macro-infinitely out and away from our finite physical universe.

I'm sorry that I do not understand your "(I-am)" question. I've spoken too I-ness many times here at TOEQ, in various threads, as well as many other sites. The thread below probably covers my I-ness V-iewpoint thoughts very well and goes to the nodal core of quasi-physical gravity and spacetime consciouness.

http://www.toequest.com/forum/mathem...sness-2-a.html

I'm on dial-out :--( so I rarely look at you-tube vidieos..Takes too long to view.

Oh here is recent quote from me in this thread concering V-iewpiont, I-ness but the in the above link I go much more into depth.

I.e. experience precedes thought. I ---ergo \/twoness-- think about something( physical ) ergo I am.

That is concerned more with verteial nodal events. Soon I hope to post Quantum Consciousness Portals information.

[melanie]

Science says we (humans) evolved from such algae, hypothetically?
Mixed with other (junk)DNA?
Possibly have a reaction?

Thanks, i will look into this, hmm, our understanding of life is getting weirder and weirder.

BBL

[Drifter]

Hi Drifter, and your welcome. "we" is specifically human but inclusive of all of our finite physical/spirit/energy --aka occupied space--- universe, is the tubes. Between the tubes, ergo beyond the finite physical, is micro-infinite true nothingness ---aka non-occupied space--- and this non-occupied space extends macro-infinitely out and away from our finite physical universe.

I'm sorry that I do not understand your "(I-am)" question. I've spoken too I-ness many times here at TOEQ, in various threads, as well as many other sites. The thread below probably covers my I-ness V-iewpoint thoughts very well and goes to the nodal core of quasi-physical gravity and spacetime consciouness.

http://www.toequest.com/forum/mathem...sness-2-a.html

I'm on dial-out :--( so I rarely look at you-tube vidieos..Takes too long to view.

Oh here is recent quote from me in this thread concering V-iewpiont, I-ness but the in the above link I go much more into depth.



That is concerned more with verteial nodal events. Soon I hope to post Quantum Consciousness Portals information.

Again, many thanks Rybo.
I see the "I Am" as the last gestalt of the ego, beyond that (the IAm) is the ineffable nothingness. imho
That's what I Am.... I am That I am..., swami Nizargadatta Maharaj
Perhaps the Iam of Hinduism's ancient oral teachings is representtative of the Eucledian Arc in Geometry?
The microcosm of the macrocosm?

[Rybo]

Again, many thanks Rybo.
I see the I Am as the last gestalt of the ego, beyond that (the IAm) is the ineffable nothingness. imho

Hi Drift, this goes to the two kinds of metaphysical.

Metaphysical as 1) non-occupied spatial/spacial as directly associated with occupied space.

and metaphysical as 2) concepts of mind.

I hope you can understand the differrence. Concepts of mind refer to concepts of space, where non-occupied space is actual existence that the finite physical universe may expand into or contract back from.

The finite physical universe does not expand into or contract away from concepts of mind.

Many people have difficulty understanding the differrence tho I have tried to lay out clear explanations over the yrs.

Rybo

[Drifter]

Hi Drift, this goes to the two kinds of metaphysical.

Metaphysical as 1) non-occupied spatial/spacial as directly associated with occupied space.

and metaphysical as 2) concepts of mind.

I hope you can understand the differrence. Concepts of mind refer to concepts of space, where non-occupied space is actual existence that the finite physical universe may expand into or contract back from.

The finite physical universe does not expand into or contract away from concepts of mind.

Many people have difficulty understanding the differrence tho I have tried to lay out clear explanations over the yrs.

Rybo

Well Rybo, I thought 'I' knew the difference lol.http://www.selfdiscoveryportal.com/arAphorisms.htm
Are you speaking of "space"(gap) between thoughts #2 or "space" (gap) between things manifest in the outside the mind reality#1 ?
Thoughts are manifest things as well but of the subtle-causal-inner realm not the gross-physical-outer realm?
One needs to mis-identify (True Self/ No thing) as a finite 'thing', to say "I" (as space it Self) think therefore "I" am?
No thing=Space=the metaphysical.
does this make sense?
(we cannot talk about what we do not understand)
d.

[Drifter]

I hope you can understand the differrence. Concepts of mind refer to concepts of space, where non-occupied space is actual existence that the finite physical universe may expand into or contract back from.

The finite physical universe does not expand into or contract away from concepts of mind.

Many people have difficulty understanding the differrence tho I have tried to lay out clear explanations over the yrs.

Rybo

What about the metaphysical universe of mind itself?

[mkirkpatrick]

That which is the primal animator is spirit,that "life" that is at the core of all manifested existence,we as three fold beings mostly live at the level where spirit is rarely recognised,when it is it is usually in times of great emotional displacement,or within a deep and powerful meditation.The "outer garment" of the spirit the soul is more often contacted and this is growing year by year.


regards michael.

[Drifter]

That which is the primal animator is spirit,that "life" that is at the core of all manifested existence,we as three fold beings mostly live at the level where spirit is rarely recognised,when it is it is usually in times of great emotional displacement,or within a deep and powerful meditation.The "outer garment" of the spirit the soul is more often contacted and this is growing year by year.


regards michael.

I agree Michael, "Scientists" though?
Metaphysics is psuedo-quasi-science at best?
I think were speaking of a quantum field
with its own universal (experiential) laws
science doesn't recognise?