Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Blue Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 97
Thanks Given: 4
Thanked 3x in 2 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005 Rep Power: 12 | If God Created the Universe... -
09-22-2005, 07:22 AM
If God created the Universe, then God should show in the physics. That has always been my contention. It's a matter of logic. I mean, how could God create something without leaving fingerprints or something?
Having searched for God in many of the world's religions for decades, I kept looking for some kind of evidence for God. Finding all kinds of inspirational literature and even some rather scary literature describing God, I had pretty much resigned myself to the possibility that God was a myth.
Then in 2000, I left religion and took up science. By 2002, I was re-examining the foundations of quantum physics when I discovered the unified charge equations and realized their implications. By spring of 2002 I had discovered a scientific basis for an enormous force driving the Universe. This force is quantum, applies directly and fully to each quantum of space-time, and has the value of 1.21x10^44 newton.
Putting this in perspective, I found evidence, derived from empirical measurements, for a huge force applied over a tiny area. Upon further study, I realized that the mass dimension in this force was reciprocal mass. Reciprocal mass has the same relationship to regular mass as frequency has to time. Reciprocal mass was, then, a mass that applied a continuous cycle of positive inertia and then negative inertia, at an extremely fast rate.
Reflecting on the meaing of this enormous force, I eventually realized there was no other way to describe it, other than "God." I called it, Gforce. Instead of Gforce being a constant pressure over an area, it is a constant oscillation of pressure over an area. The Gforce, it turned out, had enough force and the proper structure to drive everything in the Universe from linear time, to the creation of space-time (Aether), to the creation of subatomic particles (onta), and to the manifestation of three fundamental forces.
Gforce acts upon the dimension of mass to produce gravity, acts upon electrostatic charge to produce the electrostatic force, and acts upon a previously unrecognized form of electromagnetic charge to produce the strong force. The so-called fourth "weak" force is actually a proportion of the electrostatic and electromagnetic forces. The three forces of gravity, electrostatic force, and electromagnetic force mathematically linked to Gforce.
And so it seems that there really is scientific basis for the existence of God, that God does show up in the physics, and that God is the creator of the entire physical Universe. Not only is God quantifiable, but a single physics can now unite the forces, physical existence, and space-time into a true Theory of Everything. And it doesn't stop there. Mind and consciousness also come into the quantifiable physics.
The Aether Physics Model is virgin territory for those seeking the adventure of discovery. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 |
09-22-2005, 01:53 PM
When we consider the square of energy, there appears two not just one of the Gforce.  . On the other hand, there can only be one Gforce if and only if  . But nature tells us that [Unparseable Latex Formula] as seen between magnetic force and electric force, between gravity and antigravity (zero), even between mass and energy,  instead of  . Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c² | |
| | | | | | 2nd degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 16
Thanked 12x in 12 Posts
Join Date: May 2005 Rep Power: 14 |
12-23-2005, 06:11 PM
Volantis
You are forgetting the devil! Oddly they are both male figures, and don't have girlfriends. God and the Devil are creations of our own collective imaginations. WE created god and contintue to create and destroy the things that they are supposed to be responsible for. There is no intrinsic good or evil....
Namron (Rufus) | |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 16 |
12-23-2005, 06:19 PM
He could not have created, or destroyed, the energy of the universe. By he, I mean any he, good or evil. | |
| | | | | | Brown Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 170
Thanks Given: 7
Thanked 7x in 7 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005 Rep Power: 11 | GOD = Generic Order of Development -
12-24-2005, 04:02 AM
[quote=volantis]If God created the Universe, then God should show in the physics. That has always been my contention. It's a matter of logic. I mean, how could God create something without leaving fingerprints or something?
Actually - I think - GOD - does show. I spent some time this year studying the more than 70 wonders of the world. I concluded mans quest for "how they were built" over powered the significance of their being and "why". What I observed was an indication of mans lesson through wonder - as described by God when Eve committed to sin and Adam questioned temptation..
Man has long asked the question why?
The Pyramids of Giza are the most famous monuments of ancient Egypt. The pyramids also suggest Mans question at the time of existence. Mans objective became one of technological defeat through constant wonder and change. The heiroglyphs becoming a story book historical database for time and space.
These massive stone structures were built around 4500 years ago on a
rocky desert plateau close to the Nile. But the intriguing Egyptian
pyramids were more than just tombs for kings. The mysteries surround
ing their symbolism, design and purpose have inspired passionate
debate.
Sirius the God-Dog star, a binary star system close to earth, has a helical path of 365.25 days, which is the length of a year. The ancient Egyptians tracked Sirius in order to determine the year. When Sirius was rising, it corresponded to New Year's Day in ancient Egypt. This information was known and used by other ancient civilizations too. Now, getting to Orion. The earth has a grand cycle of precession of the equinoxes with a length of 26,000 years. The ancients tracked the 12 constellations of the zodiac which are equatorial constellations, and each 2165 years, a new age would occur, where the constellation was pre-eminent as seen by looking from behind the Sphinx toward the Nile River. For example, we are just leaving Pisces and going into Aquarius. The constellation Orion is the means to track the 26,000 year precession of the equinoxes. Orion moves upward for 13,000 years and then downward for 13,000 years in a cycle. Just as Sirius tracked the length of the year, so the 3 stars in the belt of Orion tracked the precession of the equinoxes.
Most Egyptologists also believe that the pyramids were meant to serve as tombs for the Gods. There are many reasons why they hold this to be true.
* One is that the pyramid structure represents just one point in the long continuum of the evolution
* The tombs were surmounted by a modest superstructure: a mound of gravel with an outer layer of mud, probably in imitation of the Primal Mound, the epitome of creation and regeneration
* The 3rd Dynasty saw the true pyramid-shaped superstructure take form, first as a stepped pyramid (successive tiers of mastabas built upon one another and descending in size to the top) and then as a true pyramid with smooth sides.
* The pyramid did not exist as an isolated structure. It represented only one element, though a primary one.
* The people of ancient Egypt believed that death on Earth was the start
of a journey to the next world.
Sirius was a very important star to the ancient Egyptians, who called it the Star of Isis or the Nile Star. About 5,000 years ago, the helical rising of Sirius occurred earlier, around June 25.
Today, as the constellation Aquarius is in ascension, we are just entering the point where Alnitak of the belt of Orion is at its highest declination of 58 degrees 11 minutes above the horizon as viewed at Giza. Aquarius also happens to be the opposite sign in the zodiac from Leo the Lion when you see the zodiac portrayed as a circle. This is why many ancient cultures have cited our time as the point in which massive earth changes will occur. They believed that at the lowest and highest points in the movement of Alnitak in the constellation Orion, that God would recycle mankind. This includes the Mayan and Aztec calendars, the Hopi Indians, the Tibetan monks and Dalai Lama, the Sumerians, etc. Of course, Christians and Jews too believe that we are in a momentous time period, when the 6000 years from Adam & Eve are being completed. Then the 7th 1000 year period will be a time of rest from labors, called the Millennium, when the Messiah will reign on the earth in Jerusalem. The fundamental method of philosophy is the use of reasoning to evaluate arguments concerning these questions .. | |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 16 |
12-24-2005, 11:29 AM
Let's ask a man about God. You both are referred to as He. | |
| | | | | | 2nd degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 16
Thanked 12x in 12 Posts
Join Date: May 2005 Rep Power: 14 |
12-24-2005, 08:05 PM
my point exactly Michelle plus most forget that our impression of the Devil must be included with every thought of some god-like creature. | |
| | | | | | 2nd degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 16
Thanked 12x in 12 Posts
Join Date: May 2005 Rep Power: 14 |
12-24-2005, 08:26 PM
I'm not really crazy about bringing religion into a discussion of how we got here. All you have to do is realize that any god would have been a non-entity prior to the event or non-event of its creation. She/He would have to have some idea of a date of beginning within a logic system identical to the one we use. In other words God would not have known She/He was God at some time and then realized later that his/her omnipotence made her/him similar to being dead because he/she had no equals for friends. Being God would definitely have it's drawbacks.
For discussions of this type there should be some way of keeping our religious creations out of it. What about all the Gods of other religions? Granted there must be intelligent design, and we provide that, (Figmentalism) since both Good and D Evil and the associated deities we have created are our guides but it's a bit over the edge to really believe that some guy is running around on clouds and thumbing his nose at another guy below the surface of the earth wearing red togs. Can't we do better than that? No....we created God and his red bad bud that much is obvious.
The real question is how is memory stored? If memory has no weight or volume and also no material or energy constituent, how can it possibly be stored?
namron soar | |
| | | | | | Master
Status: Offline Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005 Rep Power: 16 |
12-24-2005, 09:14 PM
I think we have short and long term memory storage, although I am depleted of the details. Anyone who would like to take this one, I'd be grateful. | |
| | | | | | 2nd degree Black Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 16
Thanked 12x in 12 Posts
Join Date: May 2005 Rep Power: 14 |
12-24-2005, 09:44 PM
I'm not talking about physical human memory. I mean how the universe and all the details in it remember itself between nano-seconds of its existence. If material were to exist, how could such insentient things have changes over time and recall the previous existence parameters. What force links the two states? It cannot be physical memory. It must be something between what we refer to as matter and anti matter. | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |