It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Fundamental Phenomena > General Phenomena
Reload this Page The Tao of I Ching's Yin Yang
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: The Tao of I Ching's Yin Yang
Old
  (#51 (permalink))
Grandmaster
Profpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to beholdProfpat is a splendid one to behold
 
Profpat's Avatar
 
Status: Online
Posts: 3,083
Thanks Given: 289
Thanked 506x in 465 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Rep Power: 45
   
Re: The Tao of I Ching's Yin Yang - 04-08-2008, 04:49 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by not2too View Post
Yin and Yang are typically used to indicate polarity not equality or identity. e.g yin:yang::up:down::black:white, etc. Up does not = down, but they are still at "either end" of a unity.

Best,
not2too
I agree with you not2too. a quote from a prior post above:

" The Copenhagen Interprtation (CI) described the quantum world with the principle of complementarity which consist of three parts.

1. A "whole" must consist of two opposite parts.


2. These two opposite parts must be mutually exclusive.

3. These two opposite parts are complementary to each other.
(http://www.fortunecity.com/business/...3/Constant.htm)
Does that describe an image we know.(yin/yang)

Best,

Pat
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Theory of Bonding Harmonics" -Part two- humanbydefault TOE Theory Articles 0 04-04-2007 03:40 PM
yin and yang AntonioLao General Philosophy 4 03-16-2007 06:34 PM
ambivalence for TOE AntonioLao The High Level View 37 01-30-2007 04:30 PM
Does the Goddess mean Good? harmonygirl Intelligent Design 71 01-13-2007 04:13 AM
Fusion-want it! Then look within. mkirkpatrick Intelligent Design 15 02-11-2006 01:10 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com