[RascalPuff]

Although black holes have yet to be proven, they are nonetheless very controversial and have strangely taken the foreground of discussions in theoretical physics. Their cause - if they exist at all - is not controversial.

Presently, with the exception of this offering, there may not even be any formally submitted guesses as to their cause. If black holes exist, until further notice, they are - ostensibly - the causative result of a contracting four dimensional space-time continuum; that is to say, a four dimensionally contracting material system, becoming ever smaller and more dense: to microcosmic infinity.


Another perspective of this same 4-D consideration, is concepualizing a ‘black hole singularity of infinite density’ as being 3-D matter, getting relatively ever smaller and more dense, in inverse proportion to the 4-Dimensionally expanding universe surrounding *it (*any given ‘black hole singularity’).


Does Absolute Zero Generate Involute Space?


Microcosmic test objects have been cryogenically subjected to 'temperatures' approaching minus 273o Centigrade. But the goal of 'Absolute Zero' has yet to be achieved, and Standard Theory suggests that Absolute Zero (Kelvin) may not be achievable; that it may not be possible to stop all motion - molecular, atomic or otherwise in any given test object. Though laboratory experimentation has come very close to inducing Absolute Zero in a given test object...

Question: How 'close' is 'very close' in this consideration?

Thermodynamically, it occurs to this record that in the offered circumstances and pursuit, 'an inch is as good as a (Zeno's paradoxical) mile'. My intuition (and perspective of relativity) suggests that if and when Absolute Zero is achieved - when all (molecular, atomic and subatomic motion) is stopped in a given test object, that entity will implode. Becoming as three dimensionally small and dense as the four dimensional universe around it becomes relatively large and tenuous, squared (forever) - that is to summarize: the consummation of a Schwartzchild radius and the creation of a black hole...

May the Reader please tell me their thoughts on this consideration?

Best regards,
- RP
(Excerpt from http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie )

[Lloyd Gillespie]

As Dave has also stated, zero entropy is not zero energy, or zero energy states. Zero entropy is not the ceasing of all motion, but the cause of all motion, as the newest low temperature physics alludes to, and many other high temperature and high magnetism experiments allude to a non-viscous fluidic state___Also, Hau's laser low temperature, and the Tokamak x-ray photos show similar states. The he2 climbs the walls of the container, one atom thick, showing motion still exists, at a billionth of a degree above absolute zero. It's my "conjecture" that zero entropy is the source perpetual motion mechanics of all universal motion. Only further evolution of the physics will tell the whole truth. All my facts point in this direction, and IMO, black holes are not represented correctly by standard physics models___that's just more of their impossible point particle imaginations. IMO, no "thing" ever reaches infinity or the infinitesimal in the "absolute" sense. Only infinity reaches infinity, then that may be no more than the self-mirrors in our own imaginations...

Lloyd

p.s.
Much more study is needed...