Measuring a sub atomic Vortex.

[PoPpAScience]

What if measuring a point particle, is in fact the measuring of the zero point of a sub-atomic Vortex?


What if the measuring of the undulating event horizon of this Vortex, could be considered the measuring of a wave function, or better still a string?

[dleviwing]

A vortex is just another way of defining the process of transforming chaotic EM wave functions of space through a series of harmonic functions of fields to a single symmetry wave function of the final point source particle. Black holes do the same thing IMO; they’re just big enough to suck in all the smaller vortices and stars. Both rely on angular momentum to sustain the process.

[PoPpAScience]

dleviwing;

Sorry for taking so long to respond to your post, I forgot that you did, in this thread. I love how you worded this post, and I can not disagree in any form. I think of your theories many times while I am rereading about the sub-atomic world. I had something in my mind last night that I wanted to reply to you about in your thread, but I can not remember it this morning. Hopefully later, I know it was about angular momentum.

A vortex is just another way of defining the process of transforming chaotic EM wave functions of space through a series of harmonic functions of fields to a single symmetry wave function of the final point source particle. Black holes do the same thing IMO; they’re just big enough to suck in all the smaller vortices and stars. Both rrely on angular momentum to sustain the process.

[JAK]

A vortex is just another way of defining the process of transforming chaotic EM wave functions of space through a series of harmonic functions of fields to a single symmetry wave function of the final point source particle. Black holes do the same thing IMO; they’re just big enough to suck in all the smaller vortices and stars. Both rely on angular momentum to sustain the process.

David, I have a gut feel that the above is brilliant, but I need you to "dumb it down" for me. Thanks!