Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 16 of 21 FirstFirst ... 6 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 210
  1. #151
    8th degree Black Belt Max™ is a name known to all Max™ is a name known to all Max™ is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,201
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 243x in 139 Posts
    Rep Power
    30

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Again, it isn't that there are an equal number of bosons and fermions in general, just that there should be an equal number of TYPES of bosons and fermions, which pair up accordingly.

    I use the term Graviton loosely to describe the threads of spacetime, you are right that they have not been experimentally confirmed, but a mesh of massless spin 2 particles fits perfectly with the model of spacetime I have in my head.
    Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.

  2. #152
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by Max™
    the model of spacetime I have in my head
    If it's a good model then I would strongly suggest publishing it in the Physical Review.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  3. #153
    8th degree Black Belt Max™ is a name known to all Max™ is a name known to all Max™ is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,201
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 243x in 139 Posts
    Rep Power
    30

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Still working out the mathematical formulation, though I am attempting to contact a fellow Einsteinian I learned about recently who is working down the same path I am (regarding acausality and the structure of spacetime as a phenomenonological explanation for quantum effects), getting my letters typed up and ready to send out to him and Smolin actually.

    It isn't easy to get published if you aren't affiliated with a college or have someone to endorse you.

    Essentially though, if you know anything about loop quantum gravity, it is VERY similar to the description I hit upon, and I think somewhere between Smolin, Hadley, and myself we will find a completely unified theory of relativity which naturally produces quantum mechanics and the four forces in a local but acausal manner.
    Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.

  4. #154
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,129
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 148x in 102 Posts
    Rep Power
    50

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    So how do they add up? In terms of mass, bosons and fermions are in two different leagues...

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    That's the crux of the matter, you are correct. But in a theory of quantized spacetime, it is the two distinct topologies of squares of energy that is equal in numbers.
    Actually there are more photon bosons than baryonic or leptonic fermions in the entire universe.

  5. #155
    8th degree Black Belt Max™ is a name known to all Max™ is a name known to all Max™ is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,201
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 243x in 139 Posts
    Rep Power
    30

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Being Bosonic or Fermionic doesn't depend on mass.

    Helium atoms are Bosons, for example.
    Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.

  6. #156
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar
    bosons and fermions are in two different leagues...
    bosons push while fermions pull. Push and pull as what a force does.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  7. #157
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,129
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 148x in 102 Posts
    Rep Power
    50

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    They seem more like force particles...


    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    bosons push while fermions pull. Push and pull as what a force does.

  8. #158
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    That's right. Bosons are more pushy than pully fermions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  9. #159
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,657
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,048x in 745 Posts
    Rep Power
    104

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    That particle zoo is growing again. Just when I thought I was getting down to the basic proton/electron/neutron, which is in a sense the results of that interplay, or dynamics, of those 3 quarks. Then suddenly there are the " force carriers " ( photons, gluons, graviton, W,Z ) I believe " the ghost particle " photon is the only one observed. And than bosons, fermions,leptons, mesons, neutrinos..........Too much classification........cannot compute.......
    Positive, negative, neutral. Do we need more to desribe our universe. Trinity making the One Whole and Complete. To be whole to your soul is ecstasy.

  10. #160
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Including antiparticles the count of elementary particles is set at 61. Reference: Martinus Veltman's Facts and Mysteries in Elementary particle Physics, Page 69, World Scientific Publishing, 2003. However, in a theory of quantized spacetime (TQS) as squares of energy, all elementary particles are composed of multi-dimensional H-pluses and H-minuses with given algebras for binary operations of addition and multiplication of charge and mass quantization.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top