+ Reply to Thread
Page 19 of 21 FirstFirst ... 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 202

Thread: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

  1. #181
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,075
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    22
    Thanked 105x in 77 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    I see three scenarios for the Universe.

    1) The Universe is stagnant. It neither was born nor will end. Will be like what it is.

    2) The Universe will rip itself out due to the expansion

    3) The Universe will collapse again into a point.

    The first scenario obeys the conservation rule. However in this scenario, the Universe cannot afford too much of commotion as any sudden movement can undo the stability of the Universe.

    In the second scenario, If the Universe rips itself apart and there is a change that even the quarks might be ripped apart, then we might be violating the conservation rule.

    The third scene seems more likely. Just the fact that we do not know what happened before the Big Bang does not mean that there was nothing at all. So where did the matter come from? It obviously came from an existing Universe.

  2. #182
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,024x in 728 Posts
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    "..The third scene seems more likely. Just the fact that we do not know what happened before the Big Bang does not mean that there was nothing at all. So where did the matter come from? It obviously came from an existing Universe."

    Hi Dipayankar;

    And where did that pre-existing universe get it's matter?

    Best,

    Pat

  3. #183
    Grandmaster austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute austintorn@aol.com has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,274
    Blog Entries
    28
    Thanks Given
    878
    Thanked 1,774x in 1,173 Posts
    Rep Power
    135

    Awards Showcase

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    The quantum realm that generates particles had to have always been there. This is not not amazing since a total Nothing couldn't have done anything; thus, 'something' is the natural state. The quantum realm, while a near 'nothing' of fluctuations, is still the 'something' that is the normal state of affairs.

  4. #184
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,075
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    22
    Thanked 105x in 77 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Well since matter cannot be created, this came from an even earlier Universe and so on till we wouldhave reached a time where due to some phenomenon matter or energy Probably at the quantum level did get created.

    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
    "..The third scene seems more likely. Just the fact that we do not know what happened before the Big Bang does not mean that there was nothing at all. So where did the matter come from? It obviously came from an existing Universe."

    Hi Dipayankar;

    And where did that pre-existing universe get it's matter?

    Best,

    Pat

  5. #185
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    8,526
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks Given
    582
    Thanked 756x in 626 Posts
    Rep Power
    118

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    If spacetime is quantized then the various groupings of these quanta give the objective physical reality of the universe or twin multiverses.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #186
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,024x in 728 Posts
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If spacetime is quantized then the various groupings of these quanta give the objective physical reality of the universe or twin multiverses.
    Hi Antonio;

    Isn't both time and space quantized as Planck time and Planck length, anything shorter or smaller just doesn't exist, by definition and reality. So wouldn't space/time be quantized also.

    Isn't everything in our universe based on quanta. I'm not sure about the spectrum that might be continuous? Do you know?

    Best,

    Pat

  7. #187
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,075
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    22
    Thanked 105x in 77 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    So would a Magnetic field be quantised as well?

    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
    Hi Antonio;

    Isn't both time and space quantized as Planck time and Planck length, anything shorter or smaller just doesn't exist, by definition and reality. So wouldn't space/time be quantized also.

    Isn't everything in our universe based on quanta. I'm not sure about the spectrum that might be continuous? Do you know?

    Best,

    Pat

  8. #188
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,024x in 728 Posts
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    So would a Magnetic field be quantised as well?
    ... or using the technical term for light, electromagnetic radiation. ... energies, the radiation produced is continuous, and not at the discreet energies ...
    imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/how_l2/spectra.html

    Stanford SOLAR Center -- Ask A Solar Physicist FAQs - Answer


    Magnetic fields are continuous, not discreet. ... At Earth the magnetic field is fairly continuous too, so again it doesn't really ...
    solar-center.stanford.edu/FAQ/Qemlinespacing.html - Cached

  9. #189
    Grandmaster dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,075
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    22
    Thanked 105x in 77 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Does it really matter that magnetic field is continuous and EM fields are quantized?

    Quote Originally Posted by Profpat View Post
    ... or using the technical term for light, electromagnetic radiation. ... energies, the radiation produced is continuous, and not at the discreet energies ...
    imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/how_l2/spectra.html

    Stanford SOLAR Center -- Ask A Solar Physicist FAQs - Answer


    Magnetic fields are continuous, not discreet. ... At Earth the magnetic field is fairly continuous too, so again it doesn't really ...
    solar-center.stanford.edu/FAQ/Qemlinespacing.html - Cached

  10. #190
    Grandmaster Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat has a brilliant future Profpat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,656
    Thanks Given
    836
    Thanked 1,024x in 728 Posts
    Rep Power
    98

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    Does it really matter that magnetic field is continuous and EM fields are quantized?
    Actually I think both are continuous Dip. I don't think it matters, it is what it is. The real question that Antonio suggested, is the space/time field continuous or discreet? That I am having a more difficult time researching the answer.

    Best,

    Pat

+ Reply to Thread
Page 19 of 21 FirstFirst ... 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts