If strings are squares of energy then the relation is a directional invariance property.Originally Posted by dipayankar
If strings are squares of energy then the relation is a directional invariance property.Originally Posted by dipayankar
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Strings are just a mathematical construct, one which has shown no validity outside of mathematical curiousity.
I don't think quarks exist as fundamental particles, that is... I don't think anything will be found to be there, just a region of highly folded spacetime.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
What's the mathematical implication of the word 'highly'? Do you mean many dimensions? Many layers? Many points? Many levels?Originally Posted by Max™
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
Significant angle deflection.
If you were to trace a straight line through the spacetime folded up as a quark, it would be so deflected that the end of your straight line would likely be oriented the same direction as the beginning was.
What we call a quark, I suspect is merely the region where the line is folded, and the stressed spacetime between several folded regions is what we observe as the strong force/confinement within protons/neutrons/mesons.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
If you know what a quark looks like then publish it and be rewarded with all that prize money they are offering. Quark is simply a group of directional invariance measures in angular units of degrees or radians. In QM these are called the phase or gauge as in a theory of gauge invariance.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
That's just it, I don't think a quark looks like anything, a quark isn't a fundamental aspect of reality, it's just a configuration of the fundamental substance, spacetime.
As for publishing it, it's hard to get published anywhere respectable without a degree.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
Up, charm, and top quarks are composites of 5H+ and 1H- while strange, bottom, and down are composites of 1H+ and 3H-. Anyone can publish and degree is optional.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
While that is true, getting access to the sorts of journals I seek to be published in, is a very difficult feat without a degree.
Emily: Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Stage Manager: No. *pauses* The physicists and mathematicians, maybe they do some.
If string is analogous to a Hopf link then it can represent square of energy as quantum of spacetime. I can describe it using Hadamard matrices and these matrices can be mapped into a sieve of Diophantus with 6 fundamental 2 by 2 matrices as their cores.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)