+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21
1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 202

Thread: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

  1. #1
    9th degree Black Belt dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 16x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Will the Universe end in a Big crunch or a Big RIP? Or is there other means that the Universe will end in??

  2. #2
    3rd degree Black Belt PoPpAScience is just really nice PoPpAScience is just really nice
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    435
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 12x in 6 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    Will the Universe end in a Big crunch or a Big RIP? Or is there other means that the Universe will end in??
    In my opinion, the Universe will never end. It will keep Evolving into "Infinity for Eternity". Someday the Galaxies we see in our local area today, will come together to form an even larger entity, that will be part of and even larger Evolving entity. This will go on into "Infinity" for "Eternity".
    ____________________________________________
    "Within "Infinity for Eternity" a "Paradox of Potential popped Aware" ~Allen Barrow

    "Infinity is the Volume of Substance, that some call Space" ~Allen Barrow

    "Eternity is the Continuum of Substance, that some call Time" ~Allen Barrow

    "Condemnation without Investagation is the Heigth of Ignorance" ~Albert Einstein

    An "Imaginative Mind", lost within an "Instinctive Animal", will always be a "Stupid Human" ~Allen Barrow

  3. #3
    6th degree Black Belt Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    963
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    28
    Thanked 8x in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    Will the Universe end in a Big crunch or a Big RIP? Or is there other means that the Universe will end in??
    Both Big crunch and Big rip need a constant. Something relative to which the universe goes 'out of bounds'.


  4. #4
    7th degree Black Belt Max™ is a glorious beacon of light Max™ is a glorious beacon of light
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 27x in 20 Posts
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Little Crunch and Big Unraveling.

    Little Crunches are black holes.

    Big Unraveling is when spacetime simply can't hold itself together any longer and comes undone (it's full of holes after all), just like a well worn blanket.
    How dare I be different.

  5. #5
    9th degree Black Belt dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 16x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Hi PoP... The Universe is expanding. Can the space time sustain uncontrolled expansion?

    Hi Mohan... The Universal Constant would be the constant that you are talking of

    Hi Max... Actually it is postulated that Black Holes would play a substantial role in the death of the earth.

  6. #6
    3rd degree Black Belt PoPpAScience is just really nice PoPpAScience is just really nice
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    435
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 12x in 6 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    Hi PoP... The Universe is expanding. Can the space time sustain uncontrolled expansion?
    I only believe in an expanding 'event horizon' of this Universe into a something. This something is forever adding Substance to a 'growing' Universe.

    The mapping of Galaxies denies the existence of an accelerated expansion within the confines of this Universe. Only the 'voids' are expanding, and not the Universe. But even this is misleading because, the 'voids' are getting bigger only because the Galaxies are shifting to positions where smaller 'voids where before. The truth is, Galaxies are clustering, leaving behind expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether".

    This is an "Evolving Universe" within the confines of an "Event Horizon" that is expanding for "Eternity" into "Infinity". Thus, there will always be "Evolution" of Substance, with no lack of new Substance to be Evolved.

    I have reasonable doubt about the trustworthiness of 'red shifting' of Photons, because of the many theories that give great evidence against its reliability as a measuring tool. This combined with the mapping of clustering Galaxies leaves me with my conclusions.
    ____________________________________________
    "Within "Infinity for Eternity" a "Paradox of Potential popped Aware" ~Allen Barrow

    "Infinity is the Volume of Substance, that some call Space" ~Allen Barrow

    "Eternity is the Continuum of Substance, that some call Time" ~Allen Barrow

    "Condemnation without Investagation is the Heigth of Ignorance" ~Albert Einstein

    An "Imaginative Mind", lost within an "Instinctive Animal", will always be a "Stupid Human" ~Allen Barrow

  7. #7
    9th degree Black Belt dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 16x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Hi Pop.. by void do you mean complete vacuum??

    Quote Originally Posted by PoPpAScience View Post
    I only believe in an expanding 'event horizon' of this Universe into a something. This something is forever adding Substance to a 'growing' Universe.

    The mapping of Galaxies denies the existence of an accelerated expansion within the confines of this Universe. Only the 'voids' are expanding, and not the Universe. But even this is misleading because, the 'voids' are getting bigger only because the Galaxies are shifting to positions where smaller 'voids where before. The truth is, Galaxies are clustering, leaving behind expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether".

    This is an "Evolving Universe" within the confines of an "Event Horizon" that is expanding for "Eternity" into "Infinity". Thus, there will always be "Evolution" of Substance, with no lack of new Substance to be Evolved.

    I have reasonable doubt about the trustworthiness of 'red shifting' of Photons, because of the many theories that give great evidence against its reliability as a measuring tool. This combined with the mapping of clustering Galaxies leaves me with my conclusions.

  8. #8
    3rd degree Black Belt PoPpAScience is just really nice PoPpAScience is just really nice
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    435
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 12x in 6 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    Hi Pop.. by void do you mean complete vacuum??
    I stated this in my last post; "expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether". I see the "Aether" as 'seamless', and 'infinite' in nature. If the "Aether" was not infinite, then we could say that the 'voids' are 'Big Rip's' in the fabric of space, or 'complete vacuum's'.

    Complete vacuum is the same as saying 'nothing' exists in the 'voids'. Now we know this is impossible for there to be a complete vacuum, because of all the 'photons', etc..., that are whizzing through the Universe. If there were complete vacuum voids, then we would not see the Galaxies on the other side.

    The main reason I do not believe in a 'complete vacuum' is; I can not see how a "Fundamental Building Block" can stay intact when it enters a void of this type. In my opinion "FBB's" state intact because of the constant interactions with the "Fundamental Substance" of the "Aether", and also the "FS" given up by other "FBB's". In a 'complete vacuum void', "FBB's" would become unstable, and disperse their "FS".

    If "FBB's" dispersed their "FS" in the 'voids', then this would eliminate the idea of a 'complete vacuum', not to mention that we would not be able to see light from the other side of the 'void'.
    ____________________________________________
    "Within "Infinity for Eternity" a "Paradox of Potential popped Aware" ~Allen Barrow

    "Infinity is the Volume of Substance, that some call Space" ~Allen Barrow

    "Eternity is the Continuum of Substance, that some call Time" ~Allen Barrow

    "Condemnation without Investagation is the Heigth of Ignorance" ~Albert Einstein

    An "Imaginative Mind", lost within an "Instinctive Animal", will always be a "Stupid Human" ~Allen Barrow

  9. #9
    9th degree Black Belt dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar is just really nice dipayankar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 16x in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    40

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Okay Pop... now how would you define a FBB and the FS of aether (spacetime fabric etc.??)


    Quote Originally Posted by PoPpAScience View Post
    I stated this in my last post; "expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether". I see the "Aether" as 'seamless', and 'infinite' in nature. If the "Aether" was not infinite, then we could say that the 'voids' are 'Big Rip's' in the fabric of space, or 'complete vacuum's'.

    Complete vacuum is the same as saying 'nothing' exists in the 'voids'. Now we know this is impossible for there to be a complete vacuum, because of all the 'photons', etc..., that are whizzing through the Universe. If there were complete vacuum voids, then we would not see the Galaxies on the other side.

    The main reason I do not believe in a 'complete vacuum' is; I can not see how a "Fundamental Building Block" can stay intact when it enters a void of this type. In my opinion "FBB's" state intact because of the constant interactions with the "Fundamental Substance" of the "Aether", and also the "FS" given up by other "FBB's". In a 'complete vacuum void', "FBB's" would become unstable, and disperse their "FS".

    If "FBB's" dispersed their "FS" in the 'voids', then this would eliminate the idea of a 'complete vacuum', not to mention that we would not be able to see light from the other side of the 'void'.

  10. #10
    6th degree Black Belt Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C is a name known to all Mohan.C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    963
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    28
    Thanked 8x in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    Re: Big Crunch or Big Rip?

    Quote Originally Posted by dipayankar View Post
    Hi Mohan... The Universal Constant would be the constant that you are talking of
    Apparently yes, but since nothing like that has been proved, it would be impossible to say. Every field that we know of is infinite, we do not know when the effect of anything becomes exactly zero.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21
1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts