Big Crunch or Big Rip?

[dipayankar]

Will the Universe end in a Big crunch or a Big RIP? Or is there other means that the Universe will end in??

[PoPpAScience]

Will the Universe end in a Big crunch or a Big RIP? Or is there other means that the Universe will end in??

In my opinion, the Universe will never end. It will keep Evolving into "Infinity for Eternity". Someday the Galaxies we see in our local area today, will come together to form an even larger entity, that will be part of and even larger Evolving entity. This will go on into "Infinity" for "Eternity".

[Mohan.C]

Will the Universe end in a Big crunch or a Big RIP? Or is there other means that the Universe will end in??

Both Big crunch and Big rip need a constant. Something relative to which the universe goes 'out of bounds'.

[Max™]

Little Crunch and Big Unraveling.

Little Crunches are black holes.

Big Unraveling is when spacetime simply can't hold itself together any longer and comes undone (it's full of holes after all), just like a well worn blanket.

[dipayankar]

Hi PoP... The Universe is expanding. Can the space time sustain uncontrolled expansion?

Hi Mohan... The Universal Constant would be the constant that you are talking of

Hi Max... Actually it is postulated that Black Holes would play a substantial role in the death of the earth.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi PoP... The Universe is expanding. Can the space time sustain uncontrolled expansion?

I only believe in an expanding 'event horizon' of this Universe into a something. This something is forever adding Substance to a 'growing' Universe.

The mapping of Galaxies denies the existence of an accelerated expansion within the confines of this Universe. Only the 'voids' are expanding, and not the Universe. But even this is misleading because, the 'voids' are getting bigger only because the Galaxies are shifting to positions where smaller 'voids where before. The truth is, Galaxies are clustering, leaving behind expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether".

This is an "Evolving Universe" within the confines of an "Event Horizon" that is expanding for "Eternity" into "Infinity". Thus, there will always be "Evolution" of Substance, with no lack of new Substance to be Evolved.

I have reasonable doubt about the trustworthiness of 'red shifting' of Photons, because of the many theories that give great evidence against its reliability as a measuring tool. This combined with the mapping of clustering Galaxies leaves me with my conclusions.

[dipayankar]

Hi Pop.. by void do you mean complete vacuum??

I only believe in an expanding 'event horizon' of this Universe into a something. This something is forever adding Substance to a 'growing' Universe.

The mapping of Galaxies denies the existence of an accelerated expansion within the confines of this Universe. Only the 'voids' are expanding, and not the Universe. But even this is misleading because, the 'voids' are getting bigger only because the Galaxies are shifting to positions where smaller 'voids where before. The truth is, Galaxies are clustering, leaving behind expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether".

This is an "Evolving Universe" within the confines of an "Event Horizon" that is expanding for "Eternity" into "Infinity". Thus, there will always be "Evolution" of Substance, with no lack of new Substance to be Evolved.

I have reasonable doubt about the trustworthiness of 'red shifting' of Photons, because of the many theories that give great evidence against its reliability as a measuring tool. This combined with the mapping of clustering Galaxies leaves me with my conclusions.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Pop.. by void do you mean complete vacuum??

I stated this in my last post; "expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether". I see the "Aether" as 'seamless', and 'infinite' in nature. If the "Aether" was not infinite, then we could say that the 'voids' are 'Big Rip's' in the fabric of space, or 'complete vacuum's'.

Complete vacuum is the same as saying 'nothing' exists in the 'voids'. Now we know this is impossible for there to be a complete vacuum, because of all the 'photons', etc..., that are whizzing through the Universe. If there were complete vacuum voids, then we would not see the Galaxies on the other side.

The main reason I do not believe in a 'complete vacuum' is; I can not see how a "Fundamental Building Block" can stay intact when it enters a void of this type. In my opinion "FBB's" state intact because of the constant interactions with the "Fundamental Substance" of the "Aether", and also the "FS" given up by other "FBB's". In a 'complete vacuum void', "FBB's" would become unstable, and disperse their "FS".

If "FBB's" dispersed their "FS" in the 'voids', then this would eliminate the idea of a 'complete vacuum', not to mention that we would not be able to see light from the other side of the 'void'.

[dipayankar]

Okay Pop... now how would you define a FBB and the FS of aether (spacetime fabric etc.??)

I stated this in my last post; "expanding 'voids' of 'attenuated' "Aether". I see the "Aether" as 'seamless', and 'infinite' in nature. If the "Aether" was not infinite, then we could say that the 'voids' are 'Big Rip's' in the fabric of space, or 'complete vacuum's'.

Complete vacuum is the same as saying 'nothing' exists in the 'voids'. Now we know this is impossible for there to be a complete vacuum, because of all the 'photons', etc..., that are whizzing through the Universe. If there were complete vacuum voids, then we would not see the Galaxies on the other side.

The main reason I do not believe in a 'complete vacuum' is; I can not see how a "Fundamental Building Block" can stay intact when it enters a void of this type. In my opinion "FBB's" state intact because of the constant interactions with the "Fundamental Substance" of the "Aether", and also the "FS" given up by other "FBB's". In a 'complete vacuum void', "FBB's" would become unstable, and disperse their "FS".

If "FBB's" dispersed their "FS" in the 'voids', then this would eliminate the idea of a 'complete vacuum', not to mention that we would not be able to see light from the other side of the 'void'.

[Mohan.C]

Hi Mohan... The Universal Constant would be the constant that you are talking of

Apparently yes, but since nothing like that has been proved, it would be impossible to say. Every field that we know of is infinite, we do not know when the effect of anything becomes exactly zero.