Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,000
    Blog Entries
    25
    Thanks Given
    111
    Thanked 48x in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    39

    Re: together we are one.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick View Post
    If you trace "science" back to its infancy you will see
    that its originators were spiritually orientated and were also the only ones
    educated to the point of being literate.It is only in the past few centuries that science has arrogated itself from these humble roots.However this is
    now beginning to change,in the past few years within physics in particular,
    there has been a much more open minded approach,with the Elegant
    universe,and with the much more recent idea of the holographic universe,many leading names in physics are accepting this as a very real
    possibility of how things really are!And that also includes an absolute Being?

    kind regards michael.
    Michael,
    That just shows how great our spiritual ancestors were, They were the ones who created different classes of people, they were the only ones educated just shows how they made sure that nobody should raise above them and so didn't give education to all. And when finally education became almost universal did the people really understand the hollowness of godly spirituality and come out of it to embrace science. I say godly because it is only that kind of spirituality that is hollow.


  2. #32
    In Training
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: what will be will be

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I can't see the spiritual connection of politics? My personal communication with the all seeing eye (or eyes?) is asking for guidance and ability to understand the future.
    hello everyone,
    I do not see any spiritual nature to politics either-----has there been one ever? I find it interesting that you say you seek guidance to understand the future, when all we have is NOW. This course I took last year said it this way: "You are everything and nothing, which leaves a space for anything you want to show up". And that nothing has meaning until you give it meaning----so why do we hang onto the past and let it hurt us Now?!
    teas for tea lovers.....oolong tea

  3. #33
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,774
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: They are different.

    Quote Originally Posted by rusty79
    I do not see any spiritual nature to politics either
    As far as giving credits where credit is due, some say that in God we trust everyone else pay cash.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #34
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,616
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 894x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: They are different.

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    As far as giving credits where credit is due, some say that in God we trust everyone else pay cash.

    You are darn tooting there,here the credit is crunched up!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #35
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,774
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: They are different.

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    credit is crunched up
    You mean people there are living beyond their earning capacity? In the US a plastic society is becoming more and more obvious.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top