Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,139
Thanks Given: 654
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | philosophers -
05-04-2006, 01:55 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_philosophers This links to the list of all philosophers past, present, and future. One of the future ones is GUILLE.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
|  | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
05-04-2006, 02:20 PM
Thanks Antonio. I'm really sure I want to study philosophy. I hope I achieve by the end of it a provocative and seductive writing stylo so I gain followers and then I can live from philosophy without having too many worries about other jobs.
It was interesting to see that Gadamer was born in 1900 and died in 2002, he lived 102 years! I knew before that Russell lived up to 98, and I thought it was the highest, but no! Also, I was happy to see many philosophers alive today are teachers at universities, so then I might manage to go to one where there is an eminent philosopher as teacher. I would like to. | |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | 
05-04-2006, 06:42 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao | Antonio,you may well be right there,but is it wise to say such a thing in public?Think of the young mans ego!
kind regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Green Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 67
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2006 Rep Power: 10 |
05-05-2006, 02:23 AM
Alas! It has only Western Philosophers!!!! Not even the mention of such names as VimalKirti, Vasubhandu, Nagarjuna, J. Krishnamurti, Gangesha, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Dogen, Rinzai Gigen, Tagore & many many other favourites of mine!!!!!!
Does the "recognition" of philosophy still pertain to the Western part of the world? | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
05-05-2006, 12:44 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by WithoutMe Alas! It has only Western Philosophers!!!! Not even the mention of such names as VimalKirti, Vasubhandu, Nagarjuna, J. Krishnamurti, Gangesha, Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, Dogen, Rinzai Gigen, Tagore & many many other favourites of mine!!!!!!
Does the "recognition" of philosophy still pertain to the Western part of the world? | For your information, there is a list of eastern philosophers. The thing is no that philosophy is reduced to the western world, but that philosophy itself was born in the western world. At least philosophy as seen from the Greeks, as logos instead of mitos, as rational thinking instead of divine explanation. It is not science (although that too was invented by the Greeks). The eastern philosophy does have rational thinking too, but it emerges from very different ideas and ideals, and different aims, and different ways, and different wills... As everything is different, philosophy is the western thing. I can't think for a good term for eastern philosophy. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,139
Thanks Given: 654
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 | nowhere -
05-05-2006, 12:58 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Think of the young mans ego! | Without it we won't be able to do anything, the belief in oneself.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,139
Thanks Given: 654
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 72 |
05-05-2006, 01:03 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by WithoutMe Not even the mention ... | The others are listed under various links. On of these is the following http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_philosophy
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 47 |
05-05-2006, 01:10 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Without it we won't be able to do anything, the belief in oneself. | I agree. Michael, I won't put a crown on myself. The only way in which confidence can be negative is by becoming over-confidence, and to become such thing, the subject must have power. I have power in nothing, in no area. Not even in my life, nor my existence.
Last edited by Guille : 05-05-2006 at 05:32 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 |
05-05-2006, 03:29 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by <<<GUILLE>>> I agree. Michael, I won't put a crown on myself. The only way in which confidence can be negative is by becoming over-fonvidence, and to become such thing, the subject must have power. I have power in nothing, in no area. Not even in my life, nor my existence. | May I say amigo.that what you have said,is absolutely true,and a very profound and "wise" thing to say!If you can keep this inner reality in focus your life will be rich in blessings.
kind regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Green Belt
Status: Offline Posts: 67
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2006 Rep Power: 10 | Re: philosophers -
05-09-2006, 02:00 AM
Well Guille,
Can u then kindly tell me what these ppl like Gangesha, Nagarjuna, & many others were doing all the while, if that's not wat Philosophy is abt?
Btw, have u ever done any deep study of all Eastern Philosophy (or whetever u want 2 name it)??
Rgds,
eM.
PS. Have u had a look at the Amartya Sen's "The Argumentative Indian"?? | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | | | |
