It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Philosophy > General Philosophy
Reload this Page acgra-graco philosophy
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
acgra-graco philosophy - 03-23-2007, 01:53 PM

As a philosophy of science, it is a debate about eternal time of nonvarying or fluctuating space and time, the here and now. It should, at the absolute minimum, be able to answer these questions: (1) will the universe exist forever, having no beginning and no end? (2) Do the values of entropy stay constants or fluctuate around zero but never vanish. This discourse also wants to understand all that there is about the edge between inner space and outer space, the edge of complexity between order and chaos as an edge of predictability. The question to the true nature of all quantum fields must also be elucidated. All the related physical disciplines could be found within quantum field theories: QED, QCD, QHD, etc.



Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 25
   
03-23-2007, 04:50 PM

Hi Antonio, the answer to question 1., depends on which parts of the universe you are referring to, the finite visible known, or and the much later decayed actual remaining absolute fundamental substance, to build the next fundamental finite universe. Question 2., depends on one's true knowledge and acceptance of a one thermodynamics system universe or a two thermodynamics system universe. I see the entire universe as a two thermodynamics system of the one entire system___The cold thermodynamics system___The hot thermodynamics system. These two play against and with each. The values of entropy fluctuate between the two systems. Cold thermodynamics is the fundamental thermodynamics system, producing the hot thermodynamics system. The edge between inner space and outer space, is the ever changing expansion of the hot inner space into the cold outer space. Upon absolute finite decay, the cold outer space, is in it's initial state of compression, as the vacuum has also decayed with all of finiteness' heat and motion. Cold compression motion then builds the next universe, from the hydrogolic fundamental substance, all of finiteness, has decay state changed into. A two system thermodynamics system can create heat from its infinitesimal cold motion frictions, of 0k one degree of freedom, to form the center of a new first star singularity, then bang___again. Lots of years, 10^274 appx.

Lloyd


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-24-2007 at 02:57 PM. Reason: Remove Quote
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,734
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-23-2007, 05:44 PM

Would you mind translating the Greek to English, Lloyd?


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-23-2007, 06:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
As a philosophy of science, it is a debate about eternal time of nonvarying or fluctuating space and time, the here and now. It should, at the absolute minimum, be able to answer these questions: (1) will the universe exist forever, having no beginning and no end? (2) Do the values of entropy stay constants or fluctuate around zero but never vanish. This discourse also wants to understand all that there is about the edge between inner space and outer space, the edge of complexity between order and chaos as an edge of predictability. The question to the true nature of all quantum fields must also be elucidated. All the related physical disciplines could be found within quantum field theories: QED, QCD, QHD, etc.
Great thread Antonio,1)no,the universe is within a cyclic pulse,which ebbs,and flows.
2)No,it will all fade into obscurity at the completion of its cycle.Thats the nutshell reply,
the kernel is a little longer?



regards michael


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-26-2007, 01:23 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
two play against and with each.
Will these two reached a state of tepidness?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 25
   
Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-26-2007, 02:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Will these two reached a state of tepidness?
Hi Antonio, the answer is no, never___cold thermodynamics is eternally, overwhelmingly, the greater fundamental force___infinitely...

Lloyd


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-26-2007, 02:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie
the answer is no
Then these become two catastrophic thermodynamic events which have no gradual transitions between states analogous to life-death events of mortal beings.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-26-2007, 02:52 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Then these become two catastrophic thermodynamic events which have no gradual transitions between states analogous to life-death events of mortal beings.
That would present some localised problems?



regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-26-2007, 02:58 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
That would present some localised problems?
Since it's contagious it could just as easily spread globally. No one escape death not even the great Houdini. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Houdini


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: acgra-graco philosophy
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
9th degree Black Belt
Lloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura aboutLloyd Gillespie has a spectacular aura about
 
Lloyd Gillespie's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,579
Thanks Given: 114
Thanked 44x in 42 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 25
   
Re: acgra-graco philosophy - 03-26-2007, 04:19 PM

Antonio, I do see where you may have been confused by my answer to the last post, but I was simply replying the the vastness of your question, not to the state temperature, we as humans, exist in, within the larger answer I gave. Sorry for the confusion...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
Then these become two catastrophic thermodynamic events which have no gradual transitions between states analogous to life-death events of mortal beings.
No, not true at all Antonio. Cold thermodynamic FS is constantly transitioning/transmutating to hot thermodynamic events, and vice versa, from first fundamental motion, to first stars, and on down into the final decay into the cold thermodynamics, which hot thermodynamics evolved out of, by the simple frictions of first motions of the fundamental substance, on up. The absolute fundamental substance is what is truly transitioning/transmutating from first motion friction heat, first friction sound, first ticks, however you want it, all the way up to first fusion of fundamental substance, into the first finite mass and velocity star, then explosion into a vacuumized space quantumized history of quantum, classical and relative idea space, and in that order. This is all possible, and absolutely required, because the FS must have all state changing abilities, for any universe at all, to exist. One FS must be able to change All states, cold, heat, stationary, slow, fast, elemental structures whatever, in any and all directions, if all comes from one FS, which all science and religions seems to point to.

So, I see no catastrophic events, as you do. I see a smooth transitioning/transmuting universe, of the first order. The way I'd re-write the 2nd and 3rd laws of thermodynamics, without delving to deep into the subject in a formal fashion, is; "All fundamental universal motion, is thermodynamicly caused motion, constantly and entirely equilibriated, by the balances between, cold thermo-hydro-dynamics and hot thermo-hydro-dynamics of the absolute FS, transitioning/transmuting the FS, within it's self-cold and self-hot, thermal motions." It's simply a cold first, hot second, thermodynamic engine of the universe, powered by its self-thermal motions, and fed by its self-FS fuel, all the way in from infinity, constantly re-fueling the finite engine. The boundary between the two-stage thermodynamic system, is the boundary of no real boundary. The boundary/no boundary conditions, at light cone edge, are constantly changing distances. The boundary/no boundary conditions, at the infinitisimal finite actions, exist everywhere in finiteness, and most likely far out into infinity, beyond the finiteness light cone, by the actions of distant extra-cosmic CTHD space storms. It takes a lot of fuel to run the finite engine, so I say it's constantly being re-fueled by infinite/infinitesimal FS, yet finiteness is simply borrowing the fuel from the FS, and the fuel is simply cooling back into infinite FS. It's all a series of finite visable engines, and less visable, down to the infinitesimal level, finite and infinitely located engines, and all fueled by the self-FS motions, of its attendent infinite FS.

You can call it a trickster photon, if you want to, but the model functions scientifically true, all the way, as a fundamental two-stage thermodynamic system. There are no bumps in the smooth transitioning road, of cold to hot THD FS, and again back to cold, re-evolving back to hot and cooling the the warm state we live in...

Lloyd

p.s.
The universe is always eternally heating and cooling a FS...


"To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
"Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
"The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
"The tick-tick-tick of the cesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes