Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: triple requiem

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    triple requiem

    Euclidean geometry as a branch of fundamental mathematics studies the properties of physical objects at rest, in particular, the study of reposed triangles. First, it asserts that an arbitrary triangle is completely determined if and only if all the three interior angles and all the three bounding sides are known. Second, it also asserts that the measure of the shortest side is opposite the smallest angle, while the longest side is opposite the biggest angle. If these two extremes are known then the measures of the third average mean side and angle become an exercise in triviality.

    Applying these two assertions to the measure of the universe, the two extremes naturally become zero and infinity and the biggest angle is 180° while the smallest angle is 0°, the triangle degenerates into a straight line of two rays originating from a common vertex. One is pointing backward in the direction of infinite past. The other is pointing forward in the direction of infinite future. The common vertex becomes a point of spatiotemporal space-time coordinates called the ‘NOW’ or the presence. The “NOW’ is the only reality that can be experienced. Unfortunately, it will remain approximately 20 hours of temporary brief consciousness between intervals of sleeps and awakes. Both requiems lie between the third longest side beyond the infinity of life and death.

    Note: This thread is related to Part II on Philosophical Issues of J. D. North’s ‘The Measure of the Universe: A History of Modern Cosmology’, Dover, 1989, New York.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: triple requiem

    The triangle expressed ın temporal space has but three asects to it.however ın the NOW
    of Absolute Beıngness ıt has but ONE sıde.the one sıde3 that we wıll never see.whıle we remaın relatıve.




    regards mıchael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: triple requiem

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    whıle we remaın relatıve.
    What then if we become absolute eternal beings? Would we be able to come in mental contact with the third side?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: triple requiem

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    What then if we become absolute eternal beings? Would we be able to come in mental contact with the third side?

    Yes İ am sure we could,however would you really want too?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: triple requiem

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    would you really want too
    Somehow I had the feeling that this is not a matter of choice. Eventually, we all become absolute eternal beings.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top