to e or not to e

[AntonioLao]

To be or not to be was what Shakespeare said more than 500 years ago. Now, the most important philosophical question is to e or not to e. To e is to accept irrationality but not to e is to accept rationality.

[mkirkpatrick]

To be or not to be was what Shakespeare said more than 500 years ago. Now, the most important philosophical question is to e or not to e. To e is to accept irrationality but not to e is to accept rationality.

I think there is room for both,bit like Ying and Yang!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

there is room for both,bit like Ying and Yang

Or it could be like Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors: where it is art imitating life or life imitating art? http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au...rors/full.html

[mkirkpatrick]

Or it could be like Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors: where it is art imitating life or life imitating art? http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au...rors/full.html

Thanks for the humorous link my friend,ahead! ahead! I see no ships,only hardships
methinks!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

I see no ships,only hardships methinks

However, if you combine or equivalently multiply e and the reciprocal of e you get unity or simply 1 ship in sight ready to come ashore.

[mkirkpatrick]

However, if you combine or equivalently multiply e and the reciprocal of e you get unity or simply 1 ship in sight ready to come ashore.

That's ok then,however I hope that if the ship comes ashore there is no boson
on board,as the last one I met kept winking at me and I felt very uncomfortable,
know what I mean?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

I hope that if the ship comes ashore there is no boson
on board

That is absolutely true. You see, if we take the square of a singular Hadamard matrix that is to say multiply by itself and the fact that it is a differential domain then the product is zero.

[mkirkpatrick]

That is absolutely true. You see, if we take the square of a singular Hadamard matrix that is to say multiply by itself and the fact that it is a differential domain then the product is zero.

Then we are well on our way then?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Then we are well on our way then

Depending which ways? Way to zero consciousness? Or way to infinite consciousness? It seems that when we fall asleep we are going in the way of approaching zero consciousness and when we are awake we seem to move in the way of infinite consciousness. When we die which way are we going?

[mkirkpatrick]

Depending which ways? Way to zero consciousness? Or way to infinite consciousness? It seems that when we fall asleep we are going in the way of approaching zero consciousness and when we are awake we seem to move in the way of infinite consciousness. When we die which way are we going?

We are still straddling the two as when we die we are still mostly relative?The etheric
astral plane is still only relatively real,and being so is also an illusion!

The way forward in the noble middle way.


regards michael.