In the blink of God's eye

[austintorn@aol.com]

The expansion of the Universe is a "growth" of the spacetime itself; this spacetime may move faster than the speed of light since no information is transferred, i.e., no light pulse.

[michael turner]

The expansion of the Universe is a "growth" of the spacetime itself; this spacetime may move faster than the speed of light since no information is transferred, i.e., no light pulse.

I do agree. I believed the assumption that spacetime is expanding and that it might be faster than light is
Logical. Light had potential energy, stored energy, spacetime doesn't. Two race cars with the same power, one carries more weight and is slower. It is logical
It is also logical to transmit information over distance instantaneously, independent of time.

[austintorn@aol.com]

QM correlation of a change of a property on a particle instantly to its far away twin, while not a way of transmitting information, certainly throws a wrench into Einstein's non simultaneous scheme, not to mention that the twin does something which has nothing to do with the local influences around it—and perhaps affects the local.

Is there a deeper reality in which the twin particles are really the same, making no dice? Was Einstein right about EPR and wrong about relativity?

I am hearing, though, from Profpat, that info can be transmitted faster than light. This could be how women seem to know everything ahead of time.

I'm going out to the garage to work on my time machine for a while, although I'm supposed to be staining the deck.

[michael turner]

Thanks Michael...I know you are pressed for time (ironic words...lol) so no rush here...have you given any serious thought to "what was that single point or really small, compact singularity"...??

Correct me if I am wrong but I read this as your saying that the Big Bang Theory has good supporting evidence. However, it is questionable as to where it began...do you have thoughts on that??

In reference to your thoughts on time would it be correct of me to read it that your giving Time an important position in the scheme of things..??

Can you explain at all "this event" you feel scientists have overlooked and also are you saying that time has a connect to this event which you see as actually running the framework of the universe??

Sorry to have so many questions but in my NDE I experienced "no time" so of course when I came back it was a remarkable realization that time for some strange reason is particularly relevant to life and being alive....

No pressure to answer quickly...take your time...


Mikal

The big bang "start spot" has no dispute with in the theory as I understand, just how did it initially expand so fast?
As far as what was the singularity? Everything! Matter, space, the entire universe was/ is the singularity. Nothing existed outside, there is no outside. Imagine, the singularity as one giant stored energy, exploding, creating everything, particles that bunch, mass, particles that align, waves- and wave
alignment (the three forces) and the smallest of particles that align and can't be broken down space itself.

But here is where the story continues, the part that was missed. All matter still decays, not a rapid big bang change, but a slow decay into the smallest thing space itself. This began at the seperation of the forces and continues until matter and energy all decay onto space itself. We are on a time clock and time is the essence of energy change from mass, stored energy, to the lowest form of energy, space itself, the gravitational field.
Time is absolute only in the sense that it is the measure of this process, time is change and this is the baseline change. Time is motion and this is the baseline motion. Time is relative because it works like the dopler effect, it is gravitational wave dependent with relative frequency and wavelength emitted from each piece of stored energy but controlled by the synchronization of other fields into one field, overall space itself.

One process stored energy, one compressed particle becoming one big wave, critical rapid expansion initially set it up space but it continues to be added to by slow decay of all the remaining particles until we have only one sunchronizing aligning wave, time is a measure of this process.
One process - particle transition to wave,
Three actions (time, space, and wave synchronization)

So you asked when what was missed, the understanding of the the process of matter evaporating into space and how time and space are wave functions of this process and how gravitation is a wave alignment of organizing the attached waves as they create space and join space from each individual piece of stores energy into the overall continously expanding and synchronizing fabric of overall space. In other words, the entire framework of the theory of everything had not been understood. No one thought to look inside matter to find time and space as a description of the energy release into the gravitational field.
Well almost no one, you are the temple...

[Mikal]

Thanks Michael....I am with you so far...smiles...I see the relevance of time. Now what about ether?? Is the substance of spacetime ether?? Some say yes and some say no and then unscientific people like myself wonder what the answer truly is....How do you see it???

Mikal

[michael turner]

Thanks Michael....I am with you so far...smiles...I see the relevance of time. Now what about ether?? Is the substance of spacetime ether?? Some say yes and some say no and then unscientific people like myself wonder what the answer truly is....How do you see it???

Mikal

The ether of space is the gravitational wave
Initially generated at the big bang and continuously generated by all matter and energy, it is the controlling factor of locality.

[michael turner]

[size="2"]QM correlation of a change of a property on a particle instantly to its far away twin, while not a way of transmitting information, certainly throws a wrench into Einstein's non simultaneous scheme, not to mention that the twin does something which has nothing to do with the local influences around it—and perhaps affects the local.

Is there a deeper reality in which the twin particles are really the same, making no dice? Was Einstein right about EPR and wrong about relativity?

I am hearing, though, from Profpat, that info can be transmitted faster than light. This could be how women seem to know everything ahead of time.

When is a solid, a solid?
Thought experiment....
I take a rigid glass rod
15 feet long
1 inch in diameter
Zero modulus of elasticity
I string it up in front of a class of students in a lecture hall. I have two apples, a rubber hammer, and a flashlight.
My two personal assistants that I borrowed from victoria secret, so students will show up at my class, each bite a chunk out of the apples. I instruct them to stick the bit apples on each end of.. the glass rod with the bit part facing up.
Now I touch the rubber hammer to one end and the visual vibration shows the speed of sound. I shine a light I. One end of the glass rod and that is the speed of light.
But I can turn one end of the glass rod and both apples turn instanteously. This is instantaneous communication faster than the speed of light.

Now imagine that all light waves have an aspect that allows zero modulus of elasticity. Imagine that once you have a signal set up you could rotate the magnetic field at one end of the transmission and the entire signal rotates instantaneously.
Quite simple, solids can act as one and all move together and a wave can have properties of a solid to itself, and identicle other waves.

[Mikal]

Okay I can understand ether as the gravitational wave. Does this ether have a chemical compostion to it...is the wave like motion, velocity, acceleration for example and do you know why some scientists say that ether is not the spacetime medium...and what do you mean by the controlling factor of locality???

Sorry I am being a pain...smiles...

Mikal

[austintorn@aol.com]

Quite simple, solids can act as one and all move together and a wave can have properties of a solid to itself, and identical other waves.

And since all 'particles' were touching in the singularity, all of them are entangled forevermore—everything!

When a thought wiggles, a Victoria's Secret model jiggles.

[michael turner]

It aligns with itself and can bump into itself, and maybe a complete collapse onto itself if and when it loses its frequency, I am getting way ahead of myself here.

The ether debate stems from two contradictory understandings
1). All forms of radiating wave energy, sound, water, earthquakes all radiate through a medium. You ring a bell in a vacuum and you can't hear any sound. So electromagnetic radiation should also be traveling through a medium, the ether of space.
2) two guys in the late 1800's named Michelson and Morley carried out very convincing experiments to show an ether of space and their conclusion was that it is not detectable and doesn't exist.
Two dilemias, no great answer until now.
Consider this, there is one place Michelson and Morley did not look in their experiments, they did not consider that matter itself continously created it's own ether. They never set up an experiment to look at that and their own experiments only left the possiblility of two conclusions, either matter generates it's own time and space or there is no ether. They did not imagine the first possibility so they concluded that there is only one, no ether.