In the blink of God's eye

[michael turner]

Yes there is alot of talk there and alot of articles to read concerning the EM fields and the Universe as electric....fantastic pictures of outer space too...

Okay that helps me to know a little better because believe me at this point I do not know who to believe for sure but I guess am willing to listen to all to see what I can dredge out of the discussions that go on here...

Thanks for your patience....

Mikal

Hey, it's like religion. If one is right, the rest have swayed off course. Unless you understand the questions to ask, whom is there to tell the truth? Who believes the truth teller?

Keep this in mind when searching. Ask, how does their understanding explain how acceleration, increase in magnetic field, increase in mass all effect time. Slow the aging process down.

[Graybeard]

Ok Greg...thanks...whats the difference between the universe in the beginning as a singularity and the universe in the beginning as a pre-existing state...??

Mikal

Hmmmm ....... The Big Bang posits that the universe 'started' at that moment.

Inflationary cosmology says nothing about when it started, but it was already in existence prior to inflationary expansion. Perhaps eternally, but in an incredibly dense, pressurised place ?

Does that help

greg

[Mikal]

Chuckling here now Michael....don't tell me its like religion...I am presently reading the work of Peter Levenda...his trilology "Sinister Forces." I have never seen such a mass of historical data and alot of it dredged up from the dustbins of old, old archives of buried and forgotten records..history we have not been privy to so wow...what we do not know!!!!!

I'll keep your advice in mind to kind of guide me through my journey to understand science....


Mikal

[Mikal]

Hmmmm ....... The Big Bang posits that the universe 'started' at that moment.

Inflationary cosmology says nothing about when it started, but it was already in existence prior to inflationary expansion. Perhaps eternally, but in an incredibly dense, pressurised place ?

Does that help

greg

okay Greg...this is certainly food for thought!! It kinda has a spooky element to it...lol..

Is there anyway to simplify an explanation of what inflationary cosmology is and if it was this prior existent state what would you mean by an "incredibly dense, pressurised place...??

Mikal

[michael turner]

Hi Mikal .... The Big bang as initially proposed has a number of serious problems. Most of these have been resolved by a better version that does away with the bang and replaces it with an enormous burst of inflation ... inflationary cosmology does not see the universe starting from a singularity, but sees it as pre-existing prior to the inflationary burst.
Greg, I agree with this, I believe the rapid inflation is the result of monopole wave release, the creation of space.


Hi Michael ..... I don't believe the glass rod has a modulus of elasticity that allows its molecules to transfer electrons faster than the speed of light ? Why do you think so ?

Even tho this is an analogy ?

cool bananas ... greg

This point is, the structure of the continuous wave, not the photon through the ridigity of the electomagnetic field. In other words the same parameters that keep a wave with a set frequency and wavelength throughout can be rotated at one end and the entire wave rotates, independent of the speed of the individual particles within the structure. It is the underlying principle of wave tension

[Mikal]

Okay Michael...your agreeing with Greg here so can you explain this inflationary process cause if I am going to understand anything about all this, I think its best to start from a foundation like a more reasonable beginning....so enlighten me....smiles...

Mikal

[michael turner]

Okay Michael...your agreeing with Greg here so can you explain this inflationary process cause if I am going to understand anything about all this, I think its best to start from a foundation like a more reasonable beginning....so enlighten me....smiles...

Mikal

On this thread, look at page 1, my post # 128, I think I answered it there. Let me know.

[Mikal]

Michael do you mean your opening post?? If so I will backtrack and have a look at that....


Mikal

[leskey]

Hi, Michael.

Thanks for starting this thread. I've been looking into this very topic of late and have come to interpret the electromagnetic wave as a "creation" wave. If you'll forgive my meagre knowledge of science, could this initial or fundamental wave be determined to be the source of the weak nuclear force?

[Mikal]

Well I goggled in Inflationary Cosmology and went to WIKI but its kind of like you need to be an atomic physicist to understand the jargon...lol...kind of over my head so if anyone can simplify it...would be appreciative....

Gotta crash now...early shift tomorrow and have to be on my toes with the present antics of Big Corp....lol...

Will catch up with the thread tomorrow....thanks Michael for all your explanations and patience cause I know that I am a pain in the butt...lol....


Mikal