In the blink of God's eye

[michael turner]

In the blink of God's eye, God has shown us all the universe. The nature of space, the nature of time, the nature of gravity.


Imagine, God creating a critical mass explosion like a radioactive uranium bomb, the ultimate critical mass explosion, the big bang, and like all uranium which is still decaying, all matter and energy left over from God's initial space creating big bang explosion is still decaying. With God's big bang the radiation given off was the smallest matter, the monopole gravitaional field, space itself. And also with God's universe, each piece of matter and energy continue to decay, a slow decay, into the gravitational field joining the original space created by the explosion of the initial big bang. Time, is like baking a cake, it starts when the ingredients start to change form by energy exchange. In the case of universal time, it is the change in form from matter and energy into the gravitational wave, space itself. Spacetime is the overall emission and unification of each and all gravitational fields as they blend and synchronize to align all of known space along a single synchronizing field in which each piece of matter and energy is contributing to non-locally and yet still in control locally. The nature of gravity is both local and non local alignment of gravitational fields as they continuously emit and synchronize.


One process, the unfolding universe, with three attributes, time, space, and wave synchronization, which creates the laws of nature to be the same in all of existance, and yet adapt to each local enviornment as interaction occurs, influienced by the field synchronization of the local enviorment.
More simply stated,"Your are the temple". Space is generated from inside all matter as a gravitational field emission and synchronization initially set in motion by the big bang's creation of space itself. Each piece of matter and energy is now continously adding to space now.

[mkirkpatrick]

Interesting thread starter Michael,within that blink lies the
whole expression of consciousness as substance and the
temporal field of relativity to arise and permit expression
to unfold.




regards michael.

[Graybeard]

In the blink of God's eye, God has shown us all the universe. The nature of space, the nature of time, the nature of gravity.

.... into the gravitational field joining the original space created by the explosion of the initial big bang.

Hi Michael .... forgive me if I'm telling you something you already know. If you study the actual steps involved in inflationary cosmology, (the actual sequential steps and mechanics as opposed to a big bang .. two very different processes) I think you will find much evidence to support your idea.

cool bananas ... greg

[michael turner]

Hi Michael .... forgive me if I'm telling you something you already know. If you study the actual steps involved in inflationary cosmology, (the actual sequential steps and mechanics as opposed to a big bang .. two very different processes) I think you will find much evidence to support your idea.

cool bananas ... greg

A big hello Greg!!!
Once I understood the pieces of the puzzle, inflation, uneven increasing acceleration. Everything falls into place, and information that I never knew also fits, as it should if what I picture is correct.
One example would be, the misunderstanding of Alan Gurth's inflationary theory, the initial inflation of the universe, seeming to break all the rules of the speed of light. With my understanding( theory, hypothesis) the gravitational wave has a secondary, slow decay continuously emitted from each magnetic field. Since the magnetic field formed, seperated from the other forces, after the big bang, and if time and space are actions of this process, then it makes simple sense to understand the rules of the speed of light were not broken, instead the way we measure the process didn't start until after the big bang.
If the process of magnetic field decay didn't start until a distance after the big bang happened and as we time measure like a cake being baked, not when we mix the ingredients but when we start the process and place the cake in the oven, then the reason behind the observations of inflation are related to how and when we measure time at the initial decay of the magnetic field, and not at big bang event.

[michael turner]

A big hello Greg!!!
Once I understood the pieces of the puzzle, inflation, uneven increasing acceleration. Everything falls into place, and information that I never knew also fits, as it should if what I picture is correct.
One example would be, the misunderstanding of Alan Gurth's inflationary theory, the initial inflation of the universe, seeming to break all the rules of the speed of light. With my understanding( theory, hypothesis) the gravitational wave has a secondary, slow decay continuously emitted from each magnetic field. Since the magnetic field formed, seperated from the other forces, after the big bang, and if time and space are actions of this process, then it makes simple sense to understand the rules of the speed of light were not broken, instead the way we measure the process didn't start until after the big bang.
If the process of magnetic field decay didn't start until a distance after the big bang happened and as we time measure like a cake being baked, not when we mix the ingredients but when we start the process and place the cake in the oven, then the reason behind the observations of inflation are related to how and when we measure time at the initial decay of the magnetic field, and not at big bang event.

It is interesting to me, puzzling, how this concept of time and space and gravitation have not been thought as simple wave functions. Go figure...
Did it ever occur to you, that two identicle waves, frequency and wavelength, same energy act as colliding non elastic solids to each? When two continuously emitted waves, generated from distance separated sources, interact without changing speed, frequency, and wavelength, then a wave tension is created, constructive interference, in which the stress is relieved by the objects generating the colliding waves getting closer. This is gravity, the true backaction of the Huygen's Principle.

[Graybeard]

A big hello Greg!!!
Once I understood the pieces of the puzzle, inflation, uneven increasing acceleration. Everything falls into place, and information that I never knew also fits, as it should if what I picture is correct.

One example would be, the misunderstanding of Alan Guth's inflationary theory, the initial inflation of the universe, seeming to break all the rules of the speed of light.

I tend to favour the 'chaotic inflation' version. That is, a slow roll down from a non zero value to zero, with random quantum effects controlling the slow moving wave front.

However, even tho this is a 'slow' moving wavefront compared to a quantum jump to zero simultaneously across the universe, or even bubble nucleation versions, I still consider it to have happened at many times the speed of light ?

greg

[michael turner]

I tend to favour the 'chaotic inflation' version. That is, a slow roll down from a non zero value to zero, with random quantum effects controlling the slow moving wave front.

However, even tho this is a 'slow' moving wavefront compared to a quantum jump to zero simultaneously across the universe, or even bubble nucleation versions, I still consider it to have happened at many times the speed of light ?

greg

Hey Greg,

In order to understand how things can travel faster than the speed of radiation, a little insight into the mechanism of how the speed of light gets its speed would be nice. I have studied this and I can only find two ways to violate the speed of light.

1). Cheat time, the way we measure time. This also requires an understanding of the nature of time and how we define time and how our definition of time fits the observations and experiments of time. Once the nature of time is understood, then the speed of radiation can be understood and the limits of manipulation can be understood. I have done this.

2). Understand the nature of structure of matter and energy. By understanding the structure, principles, rules, behind the laws, then you can also understand spooky action or quantum entanglment, and therefore understand the limits of movement of matter and energy. I have done this.

By having a complete picture of the nature and mechanics of wave and particle interactions and limits, rules to their interactions that allow us to exist, I can conclude that locality and non-locality have interconnected rules and flow as springs flow from many locations into a river, to an ocean.

Space, a byproduct of matter and energy decay, flows and synchronized much like many springs of water interacting, with eddy's and such to form an overall flow. With space, the fabric (my opinion), initially created as a change in all particle to all wave at the critical mass expansion of the big bang evidentially, through understanding the fundamental nature of all forms of relativity still grows as an energy change of all matter as all matter, mass and energy, decay into the single pole gravitational wave (field) from all electromagnetic radiation. Concept predicts space flattens as all mass is aligning through gravitational wave synchronization of the entire universe, a really big constructive wave interference whereby all mass and energy continously contrubites.

Because I understand the nature of time and space, I can also say that the rules are not broken, but didn't form until the decay of electromagnetic radiation started which happened after the big bang. Scientists use 10 to the -33 as their guess as to the separation of the hot liquid of the big bang into the seperation of the forces. This is the error, it is an error of concept because the nature of time is not understood by them, again my opinion.


I am saying that time did not exist, as we measure it, during this event from the big bang until the seperation and decay of the forces. Because we never thought that the forces decayed we missed this entire understanding of how the universe works in three dimensions, and time, space, and gravity can now be understood to be wave field emissions and wave field interactions(consrtructive wave interference with the tension of the interaction of identical waves emitted from differing sources traveling back and effecting the spacial movement of the sources themselves) of matter, mass and energy, as it decays into the gravitational field, the fabric of space itself.

The best way that I can relate my understanding to your understanding is to say that your understanding happened before time, as we measure time, started. Simply stated, measured speed can not be defined with out the concept of time so saying that something happed many times faster than the speed of light is not really the right way to understand even though the same observations are achieved.


Brain overload............ Crash!

[Mikal]

Hi Michael....maybe you can help me understand why you and Greg are discussing an inflationary cosmology of sequential steps or a process as opposed to the Big Bang Theory.
Also the issue of Time, could you give some explanation here. I am always puzzled when posters argue about time when life seems very much to be a learning experience which comes from cause and effect and this somehow could not be without time. Also we see time in cycles, epochs and time seems to capture our history of civilizations and is in our concepts of past, present and future.
I see the "FALL" as our spirit descending down into the constraint of space and time and if one can descend upwards I see it as acquiring degrees of freedom...
Also found this perspective yesterday in my studies..."Gravity is the force which keeps light from escaping from the universe." Do you see that as a valid or questionable statement???


Mikal

[michael turner]

Hi,
Here is my explanation to the first part of your post. When extrapolating back in time from the current state of the universe and since the overall universe is understood to be expanding, moving away from where it was yesterday, the day before, etc. It appears that the since the universe is expanding outward then all matter, energy, space itself began as a single point, or really small, compact singularity.

Now here is the delemia. Extrapolating backwards using the speed of light as the maximum distance traveled because it is commonly accepted that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, we come up short of where the big bang began.

So the question is, if the big bang theory is correct, it has a lot of solid evidence, then how did the universe expand in the initial start of the big bang, it seems logical that the initial expansion exceded the speed of light.
Greg is allowing for a bell shape curve of energies, correct me if I am wrong, and the highest energies can then exceed the speed of light. You could imagine uknown exotic energy on the other side of the bell curve with initial repulsion properties that allow matter to surpass the speed of light and conserve the overall properties. I am assuming the mechanism by which this quantum effect could be rationalized.

My explanation is different, no quantum effect, my explanation of "How did the Universe appear to hyperexpand initially after the big bang is much more simple to me.
When you decide to bake a cake, you don't start the baking time while you are adding and mixing the ingredients. You start the baking time only when the ingredients are mixed and in the oven and baking begins.

My explanation is like baking a cake. At the initial big bang, matter, space became a hot expanding liquid, as it expanded, it cooled and the unique forces became distinct, matter clumped as it cooled . This is the point at which I believe we start the way we measure time because I believe a event started here that we as scientists, have not realized and that this event actually runs the overall framework of the universe. As the forces separated, I believe that electromagnetic fields ( all the three forces) continue to separate, decay, into a single pole (monopole) field, the gravitational field. This is where I believe time begins which leads into your next question. What is time? Which I am out of for now.

To summarize, both explanations deal with how the universe rapidly inflated initially from the big bang. My explanation keeps the laws of physics intact by showing the point of which we start the clock.

[Mikal]

Thanks Michael...I know you are pressed for time (ironic words...lol) so no rush here...have you given any serious thought to "what was that single point or really small, compact singularity"...??

Correct me if I am wrong but I read this as your saying that the Big Bang Theory has good supporting evidence. However, it is questionable as to where it began...do you have thoughts on that??

In reference to your thoughts on time would it be correct of me to read it that your giving Time an important position in the scheme of things..??

Can you explain at all "this event" you feel scientists have overlooked and also are you saying that time has a connect to this event which you see as actually running the framework of the universe??

Sorry to have so many questions but in my NDE I experienced "no time" so of course when I came back it was a remarkable realization that time for some strange reason is particularly relevant to life and being alive....

No pressure to answer quickly...take your time...


Mikal