ToE for the $tarving, homele$$ and uneducated

[melanie]

Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realise we cannot eat money.
- Cree Indian Proverb

“Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn’t learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn’t learn a little, at least we didn’t get sick,
and if we got sick, at least we didn’t die;
so, let us all be thankful.”
- Hindu Prince Gautama Siddharta, the founder of Buddhism, 563-483 B.C.

You don’t have to die in order to make a living.
- Lynn Johnston

S/HE is not for sale.

[SB_UK]

we all know that money's bad -
and yet despite this -

- nobody does anything about it.

Problem
money

Solution

1.Delete all bank balances.

2.Make everything 'physical' communal

3.Pay everybody the same salary.

... .... but what of land ownership (those who own more land than others)?

- since everybody I know wants to see the World before they die (settle down into suburbia, are strapped to the property ladder) -
4.How about a 5 yearly 'random' switch from one to another part of the World ?

- an incentive to
(i) look after the property you're in (even though you won't own it),
(ii) to look after the properties around yours
and
(iii) to improve the lot of all people -

- because in 5 years time you might be in one of those other peoples' shoes.

Maybe a 1 year cross over'd be necessary to learn your new trade -
in which case -
a 1 year cross over it is.

~*~

What'll happen if this system is introduced?

We'll witness an explosive reduction in pointless complexity - as people find a simpler method to accomplish the same essential 'quality'.

~*~

What'll be the likely effect of mentioning this idea to people?
Fear



why?
because Who wants to live in a slum

... ... ... which is my point exactly

~*~

Suggest another alternative

Solution II

1.
Delete all bank balances.

2.
Make everything 'physical' communal including land

3.
Pay everybody the same salary.

4.
Permit those who don't want to move to 'stay put'
- and those that do
to so do.

... ... ... we're digital nomads

[Graybeard]

Solution

1.Delete all bank balances.

Should this be done before or after you withdraw your widow's mite and bury it in the back yard in a biscuit tin ?

[SB_UK]

Should this be done before or after you withdraw your widow's mite and bury it in the back yard in a biscuit tin ?

My widow isn't a house dust mite, I can't eat biscuits, back yards are meant to be cemented over and money is bad.

So -

- yes.

[SB_UK]

Seriously though

money is bad.

Ally McBeal and her ilk gave a cutesy feel to the law and lawyer -
can't allow the same veneer of respectability to be permitted around money - it's real bad stuff.

And of course who protects money -
the contract killer lawyer -
- claiming to be agents of {morality,justice}
- and how much do they get paid?

- the legal process selects for amorality (one must take a client regardless of belief in their case), aggressive competitive desire to win (the adversarial system) and because of the financial gain through over-complication and invention of specific esoteric expression (vicious bureaucrats supporting a bureaucracy)

'lawyers are vogons'
vogon$ vogoff!

- and why does contract law predominate within their chosen instrument of torture?

- and why does nobody I know have a good word to say about lawyers?

Give them all your money -

- who watches the most corrupt of watchmen?

- so adept at evading responsibility that they're overlooked when the finger of blame looks for a direction to point.

Lawyers are money greedy louts drunk on their own self importance.

Can you bury them all alive in a biscuit tin some place?

We'll be better for it -

promise.

Actually -
Lawyers are provably money greedy louts drunk on their own self importance -
- with politicians enriched for lawyer

- it's all very predictable.

All men need to be equal for society to work.

~*~

E B GB ?

[melanie]

What is money?


http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18696/48

[Graybeard]

Lawyers are money greedy louts drunk on their own self importance.

A Lawyer killed a snake
by the door of his own stable.
And the Devil smiled
because it put him in mind
of Cain and his brother Abel

cool bananas ... greg

[SB_UK]

What is money?
http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/18696/48

I need to see passion right now -
David Icke has it -

only problem though is that the only workable solution which I can see -
- is the enemy which David Icke fears.

~*~

One fixed wage for all in a One~world currency

(pretty sure he'd agree with the sentence above though -
we want the exact same thing) -

(if he had a better solution to the problem, I'd naturally agree with him -
all that matters is that we do what's right)

- funny also his comment on 'fear' -
his take on 'fear' walks hand in hand with the one offered earlier on in this thread.

Fear (an Icke and SuK amalgam)
people relinquish personal responsibility -
the very responsibility which people need bear to realise 'reality'
(ToE)
- to realise 'Heaven on Earth'.

[SB_UK]

A Lawyer killed a snake
by the door of his own stable.
And the Devil smiled
because it put him in mind
of Cain and his brother Abel

cool bananas ... greg

My take (based on very little knowledge) would be to question why God favoured Abel.

My first thought would be to suggest that the story is attempting to indicate a natural affinity between opposites
(Father)- -> (Son)+
and repulsion between those who're alike
(Father)- -> (Son)-

To indicate that unless -(Father)+ is a balanced magnet -
when his kids are born -
that he'll naturally favour kid + rather than kid - (if father is an unbalanced -).

(More details if required -
the suggestion is that mother and father form into a balanced duality
(either mother or father can be + or - (though reciprocally))

At duality

mother++father--
reciprocal flipping is permitted
mother--father++

child 1 -
child 2 +

child 1 and 2 equally favoured by parents

- otherwise
- in the case of pre-duality duals
mother++
and
father--

mother will favour child 1 and father child 2
(as described in Cane and Abel)

- unless duality forms
(then) -
favouritism (affinity) will be shown by each parent for their 'opposite' sign).

~*~

More interpretations of the metaphor of 'Cane and Abel' here

A Lawyer killed a snake
by the door of his own stable.
And the Devil smiled
because it put him in mind
of Cain and his brother Abel

Who'd bite the hand that feeds?

The Devil'd smile because it'd be ironic if the bad guys through behaving poorly -
in effect 'shot themselves in the foot'.

In more detail though - inadvertently killed the root of their own evil -
- through losing the gun which they alone used to victimize others.

The question'd be -
but has the desire to victimize others dissipated -

- unless the desire dissipates -
the lawyer'll find another way to exert power.

How would one go about changing the lawyer into some more human-friendly construct?

- by helping the lawyer to understand why the system which he supports is amoral? immoral?
- where the tendency of man is towards morality

and how through enforcing immorality the lawyer is gettin' in the way.

A Lawyer killed a snake
by the door of his own stable.
And the Devil smiled
because it put him in mind
of Cain and his brother Abel

It's a shame that Cain and Abel weren't asked to alternate -
sheep one year -
land the other

- perhaps then - both could have given God a sheep.

(hmmm... ... ...
that sounds silly)

A Lawyer killed a snake
by the door of his own stable.
And the Devil smiled
because it put him in mind
of Cain and his brother Abel

The lawyer can't survive without evil -
The evolution of man is all about seeing through the illusion of evil -
if one were to put all of one's power into the hands of the law and lawyer -
and then let human nature do its worst -
we'd end up with the current situation of lawyers exerting unfair power over people -
though one really suspects that this form of repression has been engineered.

~*~

Connection to Melanie's video of David Icke.

I am under absolutely no doubt that the corruption which banks exert (as describe by David Icke), the corruption which lawyers exert (as described above) and the corruption which religion exerts (the battles between Christianity and Islam currently) -

- have all been engineered (to 'harmonize' with the weakness of man) -
- to construct a foe against which we need fight in order to get better.

We shall overcome.

Absolutely no doubt (I think) -
though
- that -
those who engineered these corrupt schemes as only at the very highest level
(on a global stage) -
in these various 'disciplines'.

The first reaction which many'll have to this general notion (much like David Icke above) is to cry 'tyranny' -
- though I don't believe that there could have been any other way.

Human tendency is towards resisting change -
(described by ADDF:Stabile as the 'social impulse')

if some knew that change was necessary -
then
in keeping with the fundamental motivation of man
(towards freedom from repression) -
- the only 'tried and tested' method of getting us to improve -

- would -

have lead these guys to develop seemingly immovable 'evils' -
'evils'
- which in time -
(they *knew*)

- would have predictable consequences.

vive la Révolution

and the truth is ... ... ...

All great religions are metaphors on the same basic story - of the nature of reality.
The law and lawyer are corrupt -
only a path
(peculiar form of education similar to mathematical physics meets catechism)
to true personal morality (ADDF:Stabile 'enforced moral consistency')
for all can work.
Money is bad.

A Lawyer killed a snake
by the door of his own stable.
And the Devil smiled
because it put him in mind
of Cain and his brother Abel.

A necessary (up until now) illusion -
'good and evil'.

hey diablo -
you up boy!

How very predictable (these Earthlings)

I hear ya'

[SB_UK]

GBH?