truth of wireless electricity

[AntonioLao]

Historically, the first person who attempted to test the viability of wireless electricity was the Croatian-American engineer, Nikola Tesla (1856-1943). Although he was noted for his inventions of rotating magnetic field induction motor and successes commercializing the use of alternating current electricity, his experiments on wireless electricity (eliminating the conducting material between power source and end users) failed miserably. He died in abject poverty. Unbeknown to his practical engineering mentality are the theoretical facts of physics that different forms of energy can be transmitted in three different ways: by conduction, by convection, and by radiation. However, each holds a distinctively unique physical mechanism not found in the others. For conduction, this unique property is constant average speed of transport of charged particles (e.g. electrons). For convection, it is the existence of a constant thermal energy gradient as nonzero temperature differences. For radiation, it is constant energy transfers of particle collisions. Although all three mechanisms resulted in a final energy increase, only the convection mechanism allows a final energy decrease similar to cooling processes, which are in air conditioners and refrigerators. In this sense, the heat pumps can function both as a cooling or a heating unit.

Is there a fourth energy transfer mechanism? That is one that can extract energy directly from the quantum vacuum fluctuations of zero-point energies. Logically, this 4th mechanism is simply reverse convection, which transfers energy from a cold body to a hot body. But it would then violate both the zeroth and the second law of thermodynamics. Luckily, it does not violate the first and third law of thermodynamics. The first law simply states the conservation of total energy while the third law states that absolute zero of temperature can never be attained, which implies that infinite energy can be extracted, but harder and harder for each succeeding steps, from the cold vacuum to a warmer body.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Historically, the first person who attempted to test the viability of wireless electricity was the Croatian-American engineer, Nikola Tesla (1856-1943). Although he was noted for his inventions of rotating magnetic field induction motor and successes commercializing the use of alternating current electricity, his experiments on wireless electricity (eliminating the conducting material between power source and end users) failed miserably. He died in abject poverty. Unbeknown to his practical engineering mentality are the theoretical facts of physics that different forms of energy can be transmitted in three different ways: by conduction, by convection, and by radiation. However, each holds a distinctively unique physical mechanism not found in the others. For conduction, this unique property is constant average speed of transport of charged particles (e.g. electrons). For convection, it is the existence of a constant thermal energy gradient as nonzero temperature differences. For radiation, it is constant energy transfers of particle collisions. Although all three mechanisms resulted in a final energy increase, only the convection mechanism allows a final energy decrease similar to cooling processes, which are in air conditioners and refrigerators. In this sense, the heat pumps can function both as a cooling or a heating unit.

Is there a fourth energy transfer mechanism?

Yes there is Antonio, but it's not available to man__It's solely a property of the entire universal wave mechanics. You all keep ignoring what we know scientific decay math is capable of achieving. If one simply does the entire finite decay mechanics to nearest absolute zero k limit, at near infinity, of wave asymmetries naturally traveling over time/distance to wave symmetry__science of the total em wave spectrum decays to a distant wave symmetry, requiring reversal of thermodynamic wave function, to that of hydrodynamic function, over the there existing expansion__thus producing all the new motion/energy of the next re-cycle mechanics of another singularity of infinity__From outward motion, to inward motion. Until everyone opens their minds to the absolute mathematical scientific atomic decay facts, and their re-cycling abilities, we'll all be trapped in the foolishness of 'something from nothing', or other such 'over-unity energy non-sense'. You'll never get more out, than you put in. Only the entire Universe is capable of perpetual motion energy, and even then__it's not an 'over-unity mechanics'__It's purely sound hydrodynamics of a required distant wave symmetry energy priority, over wave asymmetry decay__A normal function of the absolute motions of our known Universe's eternal history, at near infinity. You'll never find the fundamental macro-state functions, in the micro-state functions. The most fundamental functions, only exist in the most fundamental macro-state functions__It's just pure common sense...

That is one that can extract energy directly from the quantum vacuum fluctuations of zero-point energies. Logically, this 4th mechanism is simply reverse convection, which transfers energy from a cold body to a hot body.

Only the greater Universe is capable of this, because we can never segregate the Universal field, from any of our experiments, or real world em energy technologies. Only the greater Universe is capable of segregating the most fundamental of 'Universal Field Mechanics', or reversing these functions and processes. I could state it as, the only 'zero-point energies', are the Universe's natural 'all-points energies...' Imo, it's eternally an all-points fundamental mechanics__Never a single point mechanics__At this most fundamental state-level. The Universal triad of Matter_Motion_Energy, is an eternal capability of the absolute fundamental infinite Universe__An eternal necessity of basic common sense...

But it would then violate both the zeroth and the second law of thermodynamics. Luckily, it does not violate the first and third law of thermodynamics. The first law simply states the conservation of total energy while the third law states that absolute zero of temperature can never be attained, which implies that infinite energy can be extracted, but harder and harder for each succeeding steps, from the cold vacuum to a warmer body.

We know it certainly is, because it's what we see, when we simply look up...

[AntonioLao]

The most fundamental functions

This is the positive Lagrangian function L=T-V but the negative L is V-T whenever the positive L complete a space-time cycle on the Hopf-Mobius topology.

[AntonioLao]

The Universal triad of Matter_Motion_Energy

Forgot to you the question why can the triad be matter-spacetime-energy? For me, motion is implied in all three quantum states of existence. Incidentally, there is only a quantum theory of energy. Why no quantum theory of matter is, to me, a mystery of physics since we know matter and energy are equivalent by Einstein's E=mc^2. I am still working on a quantum theory of space-time.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Forgot to you the question why can the triad be matter-spacetime-energy? For me, motion is implied in all three quantum states of existence. Incidentally, there is only a quantum theory of energy. Why no quantum theory of matter is, to me, a mystery of physics since we know matter and energy are equivalent by Einstein's E=mc^2. I am still working on a quantum theory of space-time.

Antonio, may I point out this is not quite correct. The M in E=mc^2 is mass, not matter__Big diff. If matter all turned to energy, we'd soon run out of fundamental matter to re-cycle new universes__So, imo, matter only changes states, while only its motions of mass convert to energy__Examples_there's still a lotta particles left existing after H-bomb explosions, and massive star explosions, etc... I agree motion is implied in all three quantum states of existence, as to me, none would exist without the other__That's why I say it's fundamentally triadic. The only quantum theory of matter is Dave's and my FS and AFS. I think there's no theory in QM of matter, because it has never been provable__Ya know the problem of; "What's it made of...?" I think you'd have better luck working on a quantum theory of space-field-matter motions to particle-matter/energy motions__No...???

Imo, just about everybody's missing the necessary fact of, 'An absolute fundamental substance(of some sort) must be eternally maintained, to maintain any Universe__At All...!' This is the most fundamental fact__AFS...

[austintorn@aol.com]

See Telsa having a big part in the Victorian era movie, 'The Prestige', about two magic shows trying to outdo each other's "Teleported Man" trick.

[AntonioLao]

'An absolute fundamental substance(of some sort) must be eternally maintained

Would this be the same as the square of energy?

Telsa having a big part in the Victorian era

If only we can space-time teleporting Tesla to 2010 maybe he can solve all our problems, e.g., cold fusion.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

I don't believe it can be reduced below the fundamental triadic "square of matter_motion-mass_energy..." When we try to reduce the most fundamental below the triadic level, we lose all logical scientific definition of the AFS...

Would this be the same as the square of energy?

If only we can space-time teleporting Tesla to 2010 maybe he can solve all our problems, e.g., cold fusion.

[austintorn@aol.com]

The relatively easy fusion of deuterium with triterium (sp) has a jillion problems of containment, according to a recent Sceintific American article, all of which are that the stuff is hard to compress and squeezes out all over the place no mater what.

[AntonioLao]

the stuff is hard to compress

This goes to show that almost everything in the natural world chooses any form of freedom over the same degree of oppression.

fundamental triad

Similarly, there is also the concept of Trinity in Christian dogma: the unity of the Father, Son, and the Holy Spirit as three persons in one Godhead. I'm still having difficulty comprehending the gender of the Holy Spirit? My guess is feminine.