It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Philosophy > General Philosophy
Reload this Page great circle, shed light on infinity
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
great circle, shed light on infinity
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished roadsubversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
Wink great circle, shed light on infinity - 08-20-2005, 12:53 AM

I'm not sure which forum this goes in, but I consider it to be philosophy of cosmology. This was spurred on by, and is in somewhat reference to, this post. It concerns the circle.

The circle explains to us the nature of infinity, how it can be finite in one respect (outside observer), and infinite in another (inside observer). The intriguing reason why the circle is so edifying to us is because we live in a higher dimensionality than the circle exists in; we see the circle from outside the circle's reality! Just like how we wish we could look at outselves. Well, cheaters can just look at the circle, to get the big picture.

If you measure a circle, considering nothing but the circle, your measurement should be relative to the thickness of the pencil-lead used to draw the circle. Considered this way, a big circle, drawn with a dull, fat pencil, is the same size as a small circle, drawn with a fine, sharp pencil. Thus a true circle, which would have to be drawn with an infinitely small pencil thickness, is truely immeasurable unto itself.

So the perfectly conceived circle cannot be measured in relative terms that regard the circle. It can only be measured relative to something outside the circle. This allegory is metaphorical and symbolic of the TOE.

From now on I will submit riddles, in the spirit of my post "the cosmic riddle". I hope you enjoy

subversion

Last edited by subversion : 08-22-2005 at 05:24 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,731
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
08-20-2005, 12:33 PM

Sub;
You’re an amateur. The cosmic riddle has already reached an apex of confusion and complexity. Do you think your riddles can match Relativity, QM, or string theory???


  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
what is an amateur?
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished roadsubversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
what is an amateur? - 08-20-2005, 10:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
Sub;
You’re an amateur. The cosmic riddle has already reached an apex of confusion and complexity. Do you think your riddles can match Relativity, QM, or string theory???


I don't know what amateur means, but if you're trying to hurt my feelings it won't work, luckily! Here are the riddles which will give you the answer to the TOE if you can solve them.

1.Long ago all matter was in an infinitely dense point, after which it began to get less dense. What would cause it to do this?

2.Light creates interference patterns on the wall like waves do in a tank. Yet light is observed to arrive in little quantized packets, and should not produce interference patterns. Why does light appear to act like a wave and a particle?

3.Why are we here?

these are all I will ask . If you do not like the riddles, just tell me. I thought it might be kind of fun

ps. the riddles are such that you only have to answer one and then you'll figure out the others. good luck

Last edited by subversion : 08-22-2005 at 05:29 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
Mr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 18x in 17 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
08-21-2005, 03:06 PM

1.
Cosmic evolution perhaps. The universe's attempt to either slow or speed up entropy. It happened because past conditions allowed it to happen
2.
The photon is a measurement, a description of the wave and is not real, it is not an entity like a cernel flying around in space.
3.
Why ask this question. Does your skin cell ask you why it is here (maybe cancer cells develop conscousness and therefore breed unchecked, lol sounds like somebody you know?) We all are the universe and we exist as matter, conscious or not. You are here, period Why are you here? The universe evolved by chance to produce observes and these observers are now trying to find their place in a sea of infinite possibilites and proclaim their reality to be a result of intelligent design, special evolution with the observer's existence in mind.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished roadsubversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
08-22-2005, 05:49 PM

I am here to shed light, and to bring unity, hopefully. Do you think that the skin cells and stomach bacteria and organs all rise as one to serve a greater good? Do you think that the people and the planet should all serve as one? Gaia right? And Gaia has an evolution, a procession from nothing to copmlexity. Is there a culmination? What is the extent of evolution, in it's leap from biological, to cultural/technological?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,731
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
08-22-2005, 06:20 PM

Sub;
Amateur means that you would have to come up with an amazing riddle to compete with the riddles created by QM and Relativity.

Ans 1: Matter existed in a state of infinite density due to it being in an absolute state of uniform motion.

Ans 2: Your statement is wrong!!! Light is absorbed or emitted in units of quantized energy. This dose not mean photons are traveling particles of light. Light is a wave and there is no particle nature to light.
(When you understand this you will also be on your way to understanding TOE.)

Ans 3: To KNOW

Try again.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished roadsubversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
08-22-2005, 07:46 PM

dleviwing,

1. why was it in this state?

2. my statement is not wrong! I said light is observed to arrive in packets, which is to say it is absorbed in packets. SAME THING! I understand this and am not "on the way" to TOE. So why is light "absorbed" (i.e. arrives) in quantized packets?

3. You've got the right idea, now what is it we must know?

the riddle stands
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Matter and its properties
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,731
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
Matter and its properties - 08-22-2005, 10:31 PM

Sub;
Before asking question #1 you should provide a definition as to what you interpret matter to be. If you view it as the only physical entity of the universe, then you need to know the fundamental properties of this substance.

To ask a riddle, it is presumed that the questioner already has an answer that he wants us to detect from a set of clues in the riddle. You are asking questions, not posing riddles.

I know an answer to the cosmic riddle; I doubt if it is the same as yours. Would the young care to compare his notes with the old in PM or open forum?

If one is unable to perceive that existence did not require a beginning or cause, then there will be no possible answer available to satisfy the "Cause and Effect" of existence. There is however a cause and effect for the manifestation of the universe. Since I don't accept the premise of paradoxes, existence is eternal and we need only be concerned with the cause of the universe and not the cause of existence. It's about the same answer derived by man when he created GOD and said he was an eternal being.

To elaborate on question 1:
The fundamental substance of the universe has only 2 properties: Motion and self bonding. The bonding property is at maximum when the motion property of matter is totally uniform motion. This property is at its weakest when motion of the matter is randomized into chaotic wave motions (vibrations). The total quantity of all motion types (uniform or random) must equate to the quantity of motion prior to the "Big Bang" event. This is "Absolute Motion". The universe is expanding because the collision that caused the Big Bang, brought the linear uniform motion to a rapid conversion from uniform motion to random wave vibrations of interference throughout this substance. The primary wavelength of this random wave motion has lengthened ever since the BB event. (microwave background radiation)

Space is not a void but is the fundamental substance of the universe in a state of near total randomized motion. The proper name is "Ether" or as some have called it, "Aether".
Light is a transverse wave of this unstructured matter.

Ans 2.1: In reality, nothing is absorbed or emitted; only the motion of a system is altered as to the distribution of its "Absolute Motion". When an object has its random motion converted to uniform motion from a wave of the ether, the object condenses its matter further. This is the same as saying the wave function reduces to a shorter wavelength and thus to a higher energy state.

If you comprehend this, then you can move on to know that charge is this same process of either converting uniform motion of ether matter to randomized motion (repel) or converting randomized motion of ether matter to uniform motion. (attract) Of course gravity, strong force, and weak force, are also types of the latter process.



If you pay for an education, be sure it is to learn the math, terminology, and methods of science; Don't totally accept the academic interpretation of the gauge (mathematical) theories.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Mechanics Mohsen Physics Articles 5 07-16-2007 07:04 AM
The cause of gravity wisp Forces of Nature 152 06-21-2007 03:57 PM
The story about Existence born from Emptiness. socratus Your TOE Theory 9 04-25-2006 10:28 PM
The TOE part one: baudrunner Your TOE Theory 61 03-19-2006 01:35 PM
My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System humanbydefault Spacetime 0 03-13-2006 10:47 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com