Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page center of everything
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
center of everything is one-that is the only Thing!
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile center of everything is one-that is the only Thing! - 11-03-2005, 07:05 PM

To leave one,we enter into confusion,we see many things,we see everthing and we see Nothing!The center of All is All,and that is the only Real-Thing there is.
The many and the few are emanations from the one,in Pure mathamatics there is only one or a circle,thats it!All other shapes and forms when pulled hard enough by realities fire-reveal them-selves as one-line,or a circle.We are like
realitive points of consciousness peering into the void looking for directions
Home!Trace all Things back to There-Source,and science can do this today,and what will you find ,you will find that all apparent things,eventually merge into
one thing,Is not matter one thing!are there Matters-or is it just the singular Matter!!Which of course is 1.



kind regards michael.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
upon a point a universe rests.
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile upon a point a universe rests. - 11-03-2005, 10:13 PM

logic suggests that we came from somewhere and are going no-where! all energy all life rushing towards or away from what,our destiny! fate!Was there a
center at all!What if there is no every-thing?And that there is just Thing!A
"Thing" without the "every"Time and again we confuse ourselves with lots of things,how many things is energy,thought,force,light,we are all hopefully
evolving and gaining insight into our origin,and the more we expand in consiousness we see that we are all the center of it all,and when we all arrive at our center we will witness the many meld into the one.From an Idea we became Mindful!!!




kind regards michael.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
the connected motion of 1 and all
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
the connected motion of 1 and all - 11-04-2005, 11:44 AM



This image shows green and red circles rotating in opposite directions CCW and CW. On the other hand, the green ones are always in contact with the red ones. So, if just one circle begins to rotate the rest will follow suite. There are infinite varieties that these circles can be arranged and formed at various different sizes. However, the red can never come in contact with another red and the greens likewise.

There seem to be some relative centers but I can't find any absolute center(s).


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
within the sphere lies the Idea!!!
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile within the sphere lies the Idea!!! - 11-04-2005, 12:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao


This image shows green and red circles rotating in opposite directions CCW and CW. On the other hand, the green ones are always in contact with the red ones. So, if just one circle begins to rotate the rest will follow suite. There are infinite varieties that these circles can be arranged and formed at various different sizes. However, the red can never come in contact with another red and the greens likewise.

There seem to be some relative centers but I can't find any absolute center(s).
I really likethis artwork.where did you find it!To find that centre
that wouldbe absolute,you would have to look Within,there is No centre outside,only within,whenwe look without,we loose Sight of that centre within.
kindest regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
11-04-2005, 12:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
where did you find it!
Designed it from scratch circa 1975. I showed it to two research assistants at Princeton Plasma Laboratory in 1975 in relation to the design of their Tokamak fusion reactor.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
You should see it in 3D.
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a name known to alldleviwing is a name known to alldleviwing is a name known to all
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Online
Posts: 1,899
Thanks Given: 38
Thanked 235x in 185 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 37
   
You should see it in 3D. - 11-04-2005, 12:59 PM

Antonio;
Care to learn Toronics?
If you view the image as representing spherical objects then you will notice that at the point of contact, the spin would have an effective relative motion of zero. This interface with objects of fundamental substance provides the point at which the self bonding property of fundamental matter is at its strongest. The red and green circles only represent the orientations of the axis of spin of the objects. (Torons)

You have basically shown here the basic Toronic physical structure of two of the Quarks within a proton. The only thing missing is that they are not in direct contact but they form a film of condensed ethereal spatial matter between them that have a coherent wave function .

This image is more impressive as a 3D animated perspective and is one of the animations that will be on my web-site. Velantis uses the same principle for his ether particles.



David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
convergence
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
convergence - 11-04-2005, 01:06 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
Velantis uses the same principle for his ether particles.
So it seems we are all converging toward the same center? Just called it by different names. I'm going to design more images to show another basic configuration.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
n-fold symmetry with relative centers
Old
  (#18 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
n-fold symmetry with relative centers - 11-04-2005, 01:42 PM

The following image shows 2-4-8-fold and 3-6-9-fold symmetry with relative centers.



Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Sos
Old
  (#19 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is a name known to alldleviwing is a name known to alldleviwing is a name known to all
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Online
Posts: 1,899
Thanks Given: 38
Thanked 235x in 185 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 37
   
Wink Sos - 11-04-2005, 01:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
So it seems we are all converging toward the same center? Just called it by different names. I'm going to design more images to show another basic configuration.
Antonio;
That's one of the problems, it's hard to tell when two people are referring to the same thing but only using different terminology.
What software do you have to create the images?



David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
softwares
Old
  (#20 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
softwares - 11-04-2005, 01:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
What software do you have to create the images?
The softwares are Microsoft Publisher and PowerPoint. The images are stored in a free URL site.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question concerning density, mathematical proof. Dragongod General Physics 11 07-15-2006 08:26 AM
Dark side of the Moon zeroca Relativity 36 01-15-2006 12:00 PM