Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page gravity is a force of the past
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
forward in time
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
forward in time - 11-06-2005, 03:07 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Can you Antonio access a design that would express this idea!
Not giving an excuse, however, to make this unusual design I have to move forward in time. But every time I move forward one step I move back two steps. This is just like a frog at the bottom of a well trying to jump over to freedom from the clutches of the well of time.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
unmanifested potential-before-manifested potential-now
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile unmanifested potential-before-manifested potential-now - 11-06-2005, 06:05 PM

Imagine that we are inhabiting the furthest outpost of manifestation,that we
are on the surface of a vast ocean of consciousness,and that our inner-core
is achored in the Before,we as surface entities exist in the everpresent Now
gravity that enfolds us all is also in the ever present now!It can be traced back
in (time)to when Now manifested,so maybe in that sense welook back into the past!But in the Before,there was no manifestation,just,Beingless,and we seem
to be heading to when we will become Obscoured and the now will cease to be
it will be the Be-fore again.and will be as though none of this really happened!
If we were observed by a being in the Be-fore,all would appear still,we would
seem to be frozen and rooted to the spot,it would take forever for light to go
a few inches!The Be-fore just Is,no time,no space,just all,our minds areunable
to concept this.We go backwards in (time) through Now to arrive back at the
Be-for,then we will understand the journey.

kind regards michael


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
another attempt
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
another attempt - 11-07-2005, 03:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Can you Antonio access a design that would express this idea!
I'm giving another attempt at describing why gravity is a past tense force. The reason is that what we see asides from our immediate environment of subluminal speed. All of the light we are receiving are all light from the past. No one has ever seen a light from the future. Since gravity can interact with light, the light coming toward our optic nerves were all slowed down to within light speed or even lower speed. So, with gravity interacting no light can be faster than light speed. Because gravity is pushing light back to the past. If gravity is zero then light can be superluminal and therefore we can see the future as well as the past and in addition our mass also disappear.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
image replaced
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
image replaced - 11-07-2005, 04:18 PM

The image below replaces all other of earlier posts. Note that all the photons we see are from the past and they are slowed down by gravity to a max of light speed.



Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
agreed
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
agreed - 11-07-2005, 04:18 PM

Antonio is right about gravity being a force of the past, after a fashion. I have stated before (in the chat session "what is gravity?") that gravity is a pure force of destiny. Antonio has now made this more specific by saying it is a pure force of destiny of origin. Dark energy, it's opposite, is also a pure force of fate, but in the opposite direction. Thus dark energy is a pure force of destiny of outcome. I just love the fact that destiny is a scientific term, it sounds so exciting!
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
the past is after before!
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 791x in 727 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 98
   
Smile the past is after before! - 11-07-2005, 08:43 PM

Do we Really know what gravity is!No we do not!But what if gravity is an emanation of mind,(which I think it is) and that the outworking of this thought
began in the moment Manifestation become a consious Idea and matter became
Informed with mind,that was the beginning of Gravity and that would appear to
be from the Past.If gravityis a product of thought produced by mindful intent,
then in the (before) there was no gravity (we were)gravity became-(We-are)
gravity is withdrawn back into the protyle (we were!)Each end of beginning has
no mass-no thing-just life thatis unknowable.It would be like all beginning from
a point(singularity)spiralling outwards gravity manifesting matter unfolding!All
this would bethe commencment of now,until now would run-down and become
obscoured maybe into another point,then now would also fade,and gravity would
be no more in the past.
kind regardsmichael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Newton's apple
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Newton's apple - 11-07-2005, 08:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Do we Really know what gravity is!No we do not!
Newton found out about gravity while relaxing in the country courtyard under the shade of an apple tree. The apple hit him on the head during an afternoon nap. The pain never completely disappear until he formulated his law of universal gravitation and his three laws of motion.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Moebius design
Old
  (#18 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
Moebius design - 11-08-2005, 02:51 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Can you Antonio access a design that would express this idea!
This is a 3rd attempt at a design showing the interconnection of before-now-after.

This is a Moebius strip. Starting from the outside of the clockwise arrows one go around inside and outside again back to the beginning point. Since this is a non-orientable one-sided surface, after one complete circuit, left becomes right and right becomes left similar to mirror images of reflection.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
11-08-2005, 02:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
This is a 3rd attempt at a design showing the interconnection of before-now-after.

This is a Moebius strip. Starting from the outside of the clockwise arrows one go around inside and outside again back to the beginning point. Since this is a non-orientable one-sided surface, after one complete circuit, left becomes right and right becomes left similar to mirror images of reflection.
It's more of rotative than reflective, don't you think?

Something confusing of maths is that in mathematics clockwise is negative and anti-clockwise is positive, due to trigonometry. But this is confusing, because we tend to give the positive idea to the normal one, or common one, and negative to the opposite, or anti.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
follow the red line
Old
  (#20 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
follow the red line - 11-08-2005, 03:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
But this is confusing,
Follow the red line then notice that at the start the red line is on the right but going around one circuit, the red arrived at the left of the moving arrow.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump