[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Follow the red line then notice that at the start the red line is on the right but going around one circuit, the red arrived at the left of the moving arrow.

Yes, I know, I know. But in saying "clock wise" is actually "wrong" in maths, because in math we call that direction "negative rotation", thus, our mind would associate it with "anti-clockwise", which, as clear, is wrong. And as we are talking about a math thing, we should say "negative rotation" instead of clockwise. But I understand what you mean.

[AntonioLao]

Mathematically, 3D directional properties are the following:

1. Left-front-up
2. Left-front-down
3. Right-front-up
4. Right-front-down
5. Left-back-up
6. Left-back-down
7. Right-back-up
8. Right-back-down

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Mathematically, 3D directional properties are the following: 1. Left-front-up 2. Left-front-down 3. Right-front-up 4. Right-front-down 5. Left-back-up 6. Left-back-down 7. Right-back-up 8. Right-back-down

This reminds me a really lot of permutations. Particularly,

[(3!/3)x2]x2=8

and this is exactly how to get the number of directional properties. Of course, giving the lsit gives the visual proof, because nobody can say there are others, but the equation is the mathematical proof, which is always good to have.

[AntonioLao]

But what are the 4D directional properties? My guess is 4D is just 1D in a higher dimensional spacetime.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao But what are the 4D directional properties? My guess is 4D is just 1D in a higher dimensional spacetime.

According to my permutational knowledge, 4d would have [(4!/4)x2]x2=24 different directional properties.

The problem for me with LOE is that it is the name that has recently given in spain to the Ley Organica de Educación (Organic Law of Education) which has been recently aproved in the parliament, and states hwo many years a student can repete a grade in primary, in secondary, according to how many failed classes, how many grades one can go up....

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE According to my permutational knowledge, 4d would have [(4!/4)x2]x2=24 different directional properties.

Could there be some superluminal directions within the 24 directions?

[mkirkpatrick]

It is difficult at times to express ideas,you can maybe see them in your mind but when you try to explain them it all falls down.is gravity really moving backinto the past?I know it seems to be,but is it?What if past and future were always
now,and that the now being like elastic! stretches either way.Then gravity
would be pulling us into the now stretched (behindus)if we are on like an elastic
band,or some form of Moebius strip?we are being projected into the now(infront)
then you have an explanation of gravity and (time)all existing in the now?Like a form of closed loop system.There is no past,no future,just now that stretches
out before us?????



kindest regards michael.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Could there be some superluminal directions within the 24 directions?

directions have speeds? It's har dot think about that, what do you mean?

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE directions have speeds? It's har dot think about that, what do you mean?

Speed is the ratio of electric field intensity over the magnetic field intensity. When gravity and antigravity are in equilibrium, this ratio is the speed of light. When gravity dominates the ratio is subluminal. When antigravity dominates the ratio is superluminal.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Speed is the ratio of electric field intensity over the magnetic field intensity. When gravity and antigravity are in equilibrium, this ratio is the speed of light. When gravity dominates the ratio is subluminal. When antigravity dominates the ratio is superluminal.

Hummm....interesting. Interesting because as we all know speed is space/time thus s/t=e/m so then t=(e/m)xs and as you said once, e/m is g gravity, then gxs=t, which re-arranging is g=s/t and as g=am then we can say that s/t=am and as a=s/(t1-t2) then s/t=s/t1-t2xm so then s/t=s/txm in which case it is implicated that the m mass MUST be 0. Thus, for the gravity to be e/m then mas smust be zero. But no I wonder, if mass is indeed 0, gravity must also be 0, so, e/m must be that either e=infinite or m=0, in which case, the e doesn't matter. But know we know that then the m magnetism field doens't exis,t as it is zero, but we already said once that magnetism exists everywhere, so, how can this be? Is it that nothing has mass? Or that I've done an error?