Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page gravity is a force of the past
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
gravity is a force of the past
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
gravity is a force of the past - 11-05-2005, 02:50 PM

Gravity is not a force of the future since it pulls everything backward in time. The stronger it is the shorter is the distance between its center and the object being pulled. It is a central force, which allows a straight line connection between relative centers and relative perimeters.

However, all relative perimeters are receding farther away from their relative past. The relative past (RP) of earthlings is the center of the earth. RP of all planets in the solar system is the center of the sun. RP of all our stars is the center of the Milky Way galaxy. RP of the Local Group is the opposite center of Virgo supercluster. RP of all superclusters is the center of the big bang.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
It seems to be,but past what!
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile It seems to be,but past what! - 11-05-2005, 03:07 PM

You have made some excellent points Antonio,re gravity,is it a force of the past,
well maybe! But past what!Before now,after now,or a later now?Are we moving
from one point,or centre,and enroute towards another point or centre,that is the question.If we all move in a spiral formation we will meet up with all the
rest of the universe and be able to shake hands (hopefully)before we all
dis-appear down a rather large Gravity-well?



kind regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
moving
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
moving - 11-05-2005, 03:33 PM

When we move from here to there, we are actually traveling backward in time. So, when we reach our destinations, we reached them from a vantage point of the past not the future. We can only move backward in time and space not forward in time and space.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-05-2005, 04:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
When we move from here to there, we are actually traveling backward in time. So, when we reach our destinations, we reached them from a vantage point of the past not the future. We can only move backward in time and space not forward in time and space.
This post is very confusing and goes too much against all common sense. Can you explain it more extensivelly and clearlly?

And anyway, what determines that you move in a direction in any dimension (either time or space)? Nothing, because it's RELATIVE.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
graphical description
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
graphical description - 11-05-2005, 04:33 PM

I am working on a graphical description of this idea. Post it asap.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
graphics
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
graphics - 11-05-2005, 06:16 PM

This image shows the time evolution of two space separated events.




Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-06-2005, 04:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
This image shows the time evolution of two space separated events.


But in order to the once earlier to be in later times must pass, forward, and they move forward.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
Mr. Nobody has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 19x in 18 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
11-06-2005, 12:03 PM

The faster one moves in relation to another person, the faster this person moves through space and slower through time. Movement through space slows movement through time.
Gravity causes motion.
Gravity slows time.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-06-2005, 12:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Nobody
The faster one moves in relation to another person, the faster this person moves through space and slower through time. Movement through space slows movement through time.
Gravity causes motion.
Gravity slows time.
Yes, but it doesn't mean that time get's negative, it means it get's smaller and smaller in going forward, but in going forward.

Imagen that you are moving at spatial speed Ss, well, at spatial speed Ss, you are moving in time speed Ts. If Ss goes biggern, then Ts goes slower. But In order for Ts to be negative, i.e. backwards, Ss must be nagtive, i.e. going backwards. And up to what I know space can't be negative.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Achored in Be-fore-living in now-returning to be-fore,
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile Achored in Be-fore-living in now-returning to be-fore, - 11-06-2005, 12:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
When we move from here to there, we are actually traveling backward in time. So, when we reach our destinations, we reached them from a vantage point of the past not the future. We can only move backward in time and space not forward in time and space.
Antonio.
I had a flash of re-cognision when seeing this post,yes weare moving back.but to where.The idea is very simple,that our inner-core,call it spirit,is achored in
Be-fore(universe was manifested)the Outer-core is achored in this Now,and we
are returning to Before,time and space only exist in this Now!!It does Not exist
in the Be-fore!!Can you Antonio access a design that would express this idea!
I was imagining a dot(much like the supposed singularity)opening up forming
a universal spiral extending for aeons,then returning tothe point,(before)If an
onlooker was witnessing this from outside of the now,and was watching in the
Be-fore,we would appear almost Frozen-like movement of light would be like
a snails pace!To this onlooker in the be-fore it has all been done and dusted,to
us we have to wait aeons to Catch up?


kind regardsmichael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fitz'slatest revision of what Force, Space and Time really are in the wave world. Robert Duncan TOE Theories 3 02-18-2008 01:44 AM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 10:18 PM
We, the living things, are the gravitons of this universe! andrei dragoi Cosmology 15 01-05-2006 07:46 PM
We, the living things, are the gravitons of this universe! andrei dragoi TOE Theories 3 10-14-2005 04:17 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com