Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    gravity is a force of the past

    Gravity is not a force of the future since it pulls everything backward in time. The stronger it is the shorter is the distance between its center and the object being pulled. It is a central force, which allows a straight line connection between relative centers and relative perimeters.

    However, all relative perimeters are receding farther away from their relative past. The relative past (RP) of earthlings is the center of the earth. RP of all planets in the solar system is the center of the sun. RP of all our stars is the center of the Milky Way galaxy. RP of the Local Group is the opposite center of Virgo supercluster. RP of all superclusters is the center of the big bang.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile It seems to be,but past what!

    You have made some excellent points Antonio,re gravity,is it a force of the past,
    well maybe! But past what!Before now,after now,or a later now?Are we moving
    from one point,or centre,and enroute towards another point or centre,that is the question.If we all move in a spiral formation we will meet up with all the
    rest of the universe and be able to shake hands (hopefully)before we all
    dis-appear down a rather large Gravity-well?



    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    moving

    When we move from here to there, we are actually traveling backward in time. So, when we reach our destinations, we reached them from a vantage point of the past not the future. We can only move backward in time and space not forward in time and space.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    When we move from here to there, we are actually traveling backward in time. So, when we reach our destinations, we reached them from a vantage point of the past not the future. We can only move backward in time and space not forward in time and space.
    This post is very confusing and goes too much against all common sense. Can you explain it more extensivelly and clearlly?

    And anyway, what determines that you move in a direction in any dimension (either time or space)? Nothing, because it's RELATIVE.

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    graphical description

    I am working on a graphical description of this idea. Post it asap.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    graphics

    This image shows the time evolution of two space separated events.


    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #7
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    This image shows the time evolution of two space separated events.


    But in order to the once earlier to be in later times must pass, forward, and they move forward.

  8. #8
    2nd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    292
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    29
    The faster one moves in relation to another person, the faster this person moves through space and slower through time. Movement through space slows movement through time.
    Gravity causes motion.
    Gravity slows time.

  9. #9
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Nobody
    The faster one moves in relation to another person, the faster this person moves through space and slower through time. Movement through space slows movement through time.
    Gravity causes motion.
    Gravity slows time.
    Yes, but it doesn't mean that time get's negative, it means it get's smaller and smaller in going forward, but in going forward.

    Imagen that you are moving at spatial speed Ss, well, at spatial speed Ss, you are moving in time speed Ts. If Ss goes biggern, then Ts goes slower. But In order for Ts to be negative, i.e. backwards, Ss must be nagtive, i.e. going backwards. And up to what I know space can't be negative.

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Achored in Be-fore-living in now-returning to be-fore,

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    When we move from here to there, we are actually traveling backward in time. So, when we reach our destinations, we reached them from a vantage point of the past not the future. We can only move backward in time and space not forward in time and space.
    Antonio.
    I had a flash of re-cognision when seeing this post,yes weare moving back.but to where.The idea is very simple,that our inner-core,call it spirit,is achored in
    Be-fore(universe was manifested)the Outer-core is achored in this Now,and we
    are returning to Before,time and space only exist in this Now!!It does Not exist
    in the Be-fore!!Can you Antonio access a design that would express this idea!
    I was imagining a dot(much like the supposed singularity)opening up forming
    a universal spiral extending for aeons,then returning tothe point,(before)If an
    onlooker was witnessing this from outside of the now,and was watching in the
    Be-fore,we would appear almost Frozen-like movement of light would be like
    a snails pace!To this onlooker in the be-fore it has all been done and dusted,to
    us we have to wait aeons to Catch up?


    kind regardsmichael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-18-2008, 01:44 AM
  2. WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB
    By Serge Patlavskiy in forum Theory Characteristics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 10:18 PM
  3. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-05-2006, 07:46 PM
  4. We, the living things, are the gravitons of this universe!
    By andrei dragoi in forum TOE Theories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-14-2005, 04:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top