Hypothesis of BlackHoles

[danasurya]

I am danasurya, I would like to tell you my Experiment about explanation of Universe

• Universe is expanding through some layers in loop system and Chasing to Eminent Energy.
• Particles were transferred in layers from different forces up to Eminent Energy.
• All material objects in universe are sharing with Constant forces in loop from *Eminent Energy.

(Here *Eminent Energy is without calculation of matter, particles and forces)

Above definitions would be definitely possible explaining to the Black holes.



According to Exclusion Principle (ChandhraShekarLimit), 1.5 times the mass of the sun would not be able to support itself against its own gravity, in a black hole, atoms are collapsed by the own gravity, it can not share forces and cannot contained layers. That’s why we are not seeing any one in black holes and also white dwarf, neutron stars would be same method of collapsed with atoms. For Example we assume, one object (material) goes to inside the Black hole, that particular object will take from black hole after few year latter, that object should not change life (never died and never alive) and object may be collapsed during time of black hole. Because Black hole can not be contained Layers (can not share or divide any forces like Gravitation, Electromagnetic force and Two Nucleus forces from Eminent Energy) and cannot transfer particles. There is no nucleus work inside the black hole.

Our Total System
Mater and Light are first layer in our universe (this contain atoms and photon), Subatomic particles(electrons, photons and neutrons) are second layer and quarks (other elements) are third layer and so many layers are there, these layers are expanding through different Forces. Mater and particles are moving own layer or circle because they have own property, own gravitation and own forces. Black hole is not be contained some layers, It may not be sharing forces. These things will success we are able to explain through Unified field Theorem. Today everybody considered Electron is single, it isn’t a single, Electron was made of tiny particles (these particles are produced from nucleus, form of particles is wave, wave is nothing here electron) and its moving own layer, that's why We can't see electron moving one orbit to another orbit.

Please your opinion send to danasurya_r@yahoo.com and dana_g@rediffmail.com

Sincerely,
Danasurya
India
Ph:+919346447935

[michellemfry]

That's why they call it a hole. A black hole is first of all things a hole in space and time. Things can't help but enter the hole. I don't believe that there is any space and time in the hole. As such, the hole cannot be filled.

I have been following your eminent energy theory somewhat. What I find most interesting is what you said about there being no "nucleus" work inside a black hole. I wonder if there is any work whatsoever inside a black hole. I've never seen that discussed before.

Also, your view of life existing in layers is interesting. It does sort of seem that way, doesn't it?

[danasurya]

Let us discuss about why not nucleus worked inside the Blackhole (I know, we should not see any one in blackhole). We can just imagine, First we take first layer in matter etc., after second layer and third layer depending on Particles, sub-particles and its forces.

We are chasing particle and its forces inside the nucleus (Just Thinking only), we get great energy and reaching the Eminent Energy. We know Gravitational force is weakest force in the Universe, when we are going through gravitation, electromagnetic force and two nucleus forces; we got some great energy after nucleus. That’s why I imaged nucleus is not worked inside the Blackholes.

[mkirkpatrick]

black holes are natural occurances in nature to bring into force the basic law
of economy,and to recycle force from one dimesion to another,the basic law of economy states that rotation,dilation,expurgeation,are the ways to transfer
energy with the minimum of effort.A vortex is the Sign of absolute intelligence!



kind regards michael.

[heretic]

could it be that a black hole is the theory of the "big bang" in reverse? matter came form nothing so why cant it go back? could it could be a random choice of the greater universe?

[mkirkpatrick]

could it be that a black hole is the theory of the "big bang" in reverse? matter came form nothing so why cant it go back? could it could be a random choice of the greater universe?

It could be,but I very much doubt it,

kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Michael, I'm not sure why you doubt this. It could make sense. If time is simultaneous (as I believe) and if you accept that at some point the expansion of the universe slows and possibly reverses, the big bang becomes the big implosion and may leave a matter vaccuum. If all of time is simultaneous, we would see the result of the implosion now, as a void. We continue to see big bangs, don't we?

[mkirkpatrick]

Michael, I'm not sure why you doubt this. It could make sense. If time is simultaneous (as I believe) and if you accept that at some point the expansion of the universe slows and possibly reverses, the big bang becomes the big implosion and may leave a matter vaccuum. If all of time is simultaneous, we would see the result of the implosion now, as a void. We continue to see big bangs, don't we?

No we do not,unless of course
you include a supernova,that would and is of course a big bang,but nothing
compaired to THE "supposed" big bang.And time is just a limiting name for what it really is,and that is the ever present Now!

kind regards michael.

[jessebonin]

Why cant a black hole be simply what it is, a mass of cold mater so dense that it traps (which i doubt) or bends light to give the appearance of empty space.
Why do I doubt that light can be actually trapped? Because for light to be trapped by gravity it would have to have mass, which we know it does not, it can however be bent apparently refracted by superheated atoms and turned in a new direction.
Time and distance are interchangable as well as motion. Time is at its most basic an effect of energy, as motion is energy and distance is relative to motion. We see light as an effect of energy on an atom, if you were to accelerate said atom to the speed of light, as atoms approaching a black hole do then light would have no matter to energize.
All atoms if you compress them sufficiently would loose all of their relevant particle an become a new atom altogether, I would surmise with enough pressure or force you could turn any atom into carbon, a non reflective black mass that can be compressed into something even denser than diamond.
The problem with the all absorbing back holes is the plasma it ejects at its axis. Even plasma has substance and carries energy, which is of course light. Remember that light is also the electro magnetic spectrum, including everything for the infra red an longer to the gamma and shorter, and not all of these radiations are effected by a black hole.

[mkirkpatrick]

You could have a valid point there.need to ponder this one!
kind regards michael.