Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    zero origin of mass

    When mass is zero as that of photon, gluon, and graviton and maybe that of neutrino, the electric field vector is orthogonal to the radius vector. See http://www.freefileupload.net/file.p...4680629/EM.PDF
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    pdf file access

    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #3
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    If the electric field vector is orthogonal to the radius field vector, shouldn't also the magnetic field vector be orthogonal to the time field vector. I don't know if a time field vector exists at all, but if it does, it would make sense. Mass zero, then gravity zero, then radius is to electric what time to magnetic.

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    magnetic field vector

    The question is whether the magnetic field vector is really the radius vector. In electromagnetism, this is certainly the case in point and both vectors are in constant variation changes in magnitudes and in directions.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The question is whether the magnetic field vector is really the radius vector. In electromagnetism, this is certainly the case in point and both vectors are in constant variation changes in magnitudes and in directions.
    But the direction of magnetism is always one way, whiles the radius can be to any direction, right?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    changing field

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    But the direction of magnetism is always one way
    According to Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism, the electric and magnetic field directions are constantly changing.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #7
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    According to Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism, the electric and magnetic field directions are constantly changing.
    Yes, put also according to Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism, there are no particles of magnetism (magnetic monopoles) due to the equation:


    But we believe in it. Maybe particularly this difference can derive that the directions of the fields although are changing constantly, the cause of it is to do with other forces/energies.

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    zero divergence

    the divergence of magnetic field intensity is zero in the vacuum but not in matter.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rearrangement of physic's foundation
    By Duane Ertle in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 02-17-2006, 02:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top