Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    zero origin of charge

    There is a strong possibility that the total electric charge of the universe is zero, meaning that the total number of positives and total number of negatives is the same. However, if a single positive charge is separated from a single negative one and no matter how tiny this distance is, an electric field is created in the process of separation and a voltage potential is said to exist between the separation gap.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    But as the electric field approaches 0, the magnetic field approaches infinity. So if the positives and negatives are put together, the magnetic field would be everywhere with the maximum intensity that the mass/gravity alouds in each area. In this case, there would be infinite time and everything would therefore be still. That would mean no kinetic energy, so, can we say that the the magetic field is inverse to the kinetic energy?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    not by Maxwell's theory

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    But as the electric field approaches 0, the magnetic field approaches infinity.
    Electrostatic field does not produce magnetostatic field, vice versa. Magnetic field is a consequence of electrodynamic processes.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Electrostatic field does not produce magnetostatic field, vice versa. Magnetic field is a consequence of electrodynamic processes.
    And is there a mathematical relationship between electrostatic fields and electrodynamic fields/processes?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Coulomb's law

    the common math connection could be Coulomb's law?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    the common math connection could be Coulomb's law?
    I'll have to investigate this deeply.

  7. #7
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    26
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: zero origin of charge

    I Want About Electrotatics That We Study In Lower Classes That Rubing Of Fur On Wood Will Produces The Transfer Of Electrons From Fur To Wood. Its The Ionization Of Fur Atom So Weak That A Frictional Energy Can Remove That Electrons. And If We Repeat This For Long Time Can We Able To Remove Most Of The Electrons.

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: zero origin of charge

    Quote Originally Posted by HIGGSBOSONS
    If We Repeat This For Long Time Can We Able To Remove Most Of The Electrons.
    All depends on the energy expenses.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: zero origin of charge

    Antonio,maybe the "charge" comes at the expence off force denied?


    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #10
    Orange Belt
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pakistan
    Posts
    26
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    22

    Re: zero origin of charge

    As We Know Experimentally That When Ever Neutral Body Like Metal Goes Near Or Touch The Charged Object Then Neutral Object Also Gain Charges Why. I Think Neutral Objects Don't Like To Interact With Other Objects Easily.

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. CONTROVERSIAL...? GET THIS! ...photons w/o charge...
    By humanbydefault in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 04-22-2006, 03:59 PM
  2. The Dimensions of Charge
    By volantis in forum Relativity
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-29-2005, 02:08 PM
  3. Aether Physics Model
    By volantis in forum General Physics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-23-2005, 04:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top