When does energy become zero? What is the meaning of zero-point energy?
When does energy become zero? What is the meaning of zero-point energy?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Energy becomes zeron when space-time obtains all the particles of forces and thus there is no force for a possible energy.
classical physics seems to indicate that when force is zero energy is also zero. The strong nuclear force defies this classical conception.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
In strong nuclear force there is no energy? This is either a wrong interpretation by physicists, or.... a wrong interpretation by pysicists. No other possibility.Originally Posted by AntonioLao
the mystery of the strong force is that below 1 fermi, it is repulsive. Above 3 fermis it is zero. In between 1 and 3 it is attractive but at the minimum potential of 100 MeV it is zero.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
I don't have much knowledge in quantum chronodynamics, which I think it unified weak force with EM? Is the strong force unified to any force yet?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I dont think so. However, its solution might also solve controlled thermonuclear fusion.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Or might allow a gravito-nuclear fusion. The interaction of gravitons causing a de-structuring of the particular zone of spacetime, and when you shoot two mass particles to the place from opposite sides, the will be eventually going through a false vacuum, that would mean they gain speed and in the very centre of the destructured zone, the repel, and as the spacetime is deconstructed, when the arrive at 1 fermi distance, the strong force can't interact them, and they wil leave staymotionless when it's zero (as the electric force also can't affect them). Then another pair is shooted, and so and so, until the deconstructed spacetime is covered full, and when the protons are at smaller distance than a fermi, they will repel, and the electric charge will work ones they are just a bit out of the zone, they will repel. This would make a big energy, and isn't that dangerous. The problem is collecting the energy.Originally Posted by AntonioLao
what you described are the kinematics of particle interactions but what is needed is resonance frequency or Larmor frequency for fusion initialization.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
It's hard to work about energy. A month ago in school they took our class to the computer room and we did a test to determine what we should be when we are old. The program asked us questions about what we would enjoy or nto to do, with 5 levels, and then what we are good at and not, and then the conditions we would like in work. The first work, that matched me most was 78%--which although s high, it was the lowest higher match up of the class-- and it was engeneering of fuels and energy. Then came other 5 that match me also a lot, all physics related.Originally Posted by AntonioLao
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)