Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page zero origin of energy
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
zero origin of energy
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
zero origin of energy - 12-22-2005, 01:30 PM

When does energy become zero? What is the meaning of zero-point energy?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-22-2005, 04:57 PM

Energy becomes zeron when space-time obtains all the particles of forces and thus there is no force for a possible energy.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
zero and not zero
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
zero and not zero - 12-27-2005, 01:39 PM

classical physics seems to indicate that when force is zero energy is also zero. The strong nuclear force defies this classical conception.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-27-2005, 03:18 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
classical physics seems to indicate that when force is zero energy is also zero. The strong nuclear force defies this classical conception.
In strong nuclear force there is no energy? This is either a wrong interpretation by physicists, or.... a wrong interpretation by pysicists. No other possibility.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
force and energy not both zero
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
force and energy not both zero - 12-27-2005, 03:26 PM

the mystery of the strong force is that below 1 fermi, it is repulsive. Above 3 fermis it is zero. In between 1 and 3 it is attractive but at the minimum potential of 100 MeV it is zero.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-27-2005, 03:35 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
the mystery of the strong force is that below 1 fermi, it is repulsive. Above 3 fermis it is zero. In between 1 and 3 it is attractive but at the minimum potential of 100 MeV it is zero.
I don't have much knowledge in quantum chronodynamics, which I think it unified weak force with EM? Is the strong force unified to any force yet?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
12-27-2005, 03:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Is the strong force unified to any force yet?
I dont think so. However, its solution might also solve controlled thermonuclear fusion.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-28-2005, 06:12 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I dont think so. However, its solution might also solve controlled thermonuclear fusion.
Or might allow a gravito-nuclear fusion. The interaction of gravitons causing a de-structuring of the particular zone of spacetime, and when you shoot two mass particles to the place from opposite sides, the will be eventually going through a false vacuum, that would mean they gain speed and in the very centre of the destructured zone, the repel, and as the spacetime is deconstructed, when the arrive at 1 fermi distance, the strong force can't interact them, and they wil leave staymotionless when it's zero (as the electric force also can't affect them). Then another pair is shooted, and so and so, until the deconstructed spacetime is covered full, and when the protons are at smaller distance than a fermi, they will repel, and the electric charge will work ones they are just a bit out of the zone, they will repel. This would make a big energy, and isn't that dangerous. The problem is collecting the energy.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
resonance frequency
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 79
   
resonance frequency - 12-28-2005, 12:04 PM

what you described are the kinematics of particle interactions but what is needed is resonance frequency or Larmor frequency for fusion initialization.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-28-2005, 03:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
what you described are the kinematics of particle interactions but what is needed is resonance frequency or Larmor frequency for fusion initialization.
It's hard to work about energy. A month ago in school they took our class to the computer room and we did a test to determine what we should be when we are old. The program asked us questions about what we would enjoy or nto to do, with 5 levels, and then what we are good at and not, and then the conditions we would like in work. The first work, that matched me most was 78%--which although s high, it was the lowest higher match up of the class-- and it was engeneering of fuels and energy. Then came other 5 that match me also a lot, all physics related.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Singularity As Separate Entity Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 12 09-11-2008 09:44 PM
The Young's Experiment humanbydefault Philosophy Articles 1 05-20-2007 08:00 AM
Rediscovering the Atomic Model (Part One) humanbydefault Physics Articles 1 04-02-2006 05:48 PM
Rearrangement of physic's foundation Duane Ertle Cosmology 41 02-17-2006 02:27 PM
Rediscovering the Atomic Model (Part Two) humanbydefault Physics Articles 2 12-18-2005 11:55 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com