Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page Lorentz force is a force of the future
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Lorentz force is a force of the future
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Lorentz force is a force of the future - 12-22-2005, 02:19 PM

Lorentz force of electromagnetism is a force of the future. The light at the end of the tunnel.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-22-2005, 05:02 PM

Do you mean that all electromagnetism will eventually becom Lorenz force?

If so, what is Lorenz force made of?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
EM force is the same as Lorentz
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
EM force is the same as Lorentz - 12-27-2005, 01:42 PM

Lorentz force is the same force as electromagnetic force. It is the sum of electric force and magnetic force.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-27-2005, 03:20 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Lorentz force is the same force as electromagnetic force. It is the sum of electric force and magnetic force.
I've been doing many mathematical workings which have taken me to an important discoverment towards EM being unified with Gravity throughout the electromagnetic equations and spetial relativity.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
how about general relativity?
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
how about general relativity? - 12-27-2005, 03:29 PM

Aren't you forgetting the nonlinear field equations of general relativity?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-27-2005, 03:33 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Aren't you forgetting the nonlinear field equations of general relativity?
No. But GR's math leads to complications with QM. Whiles if I do a re-unification of Maxwell and young Einstein, I could avoid older Einstein's problem with Bohr, Heisenberg and all the other quantum guys, and therefore be nearrer to a TOE.

I've decided to adopt this method because it's easier to re-formulate one of the halfs than putting them to gether form how they are, specially if I don't want to go into illusionary theories: strings, aether...
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Poincare group or Lorentz group?
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Poincare group or Lorentz group? - 12-27-2005, 03:42 PM

Are you then using the more general Poincare group instead of the usual Lorentz group? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincare_group


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-28-2005, 06:16 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Are you then using the more general Poincare group instead of the usual Lorentz group? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincare_group
Still haven't gone on to that. But up to what I see, neither of them satisfy my math, so I wil have to develop a "Garridonian Group" which is good enough.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
algebra
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
algebra - 12-28-2005, 12:09 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
I wil have to develop a "Garridonian Group" which is good enough.
Can you show me your tentative algebra? Associativity, commutativity, distributativity, identity, inversibility, etc?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
12-28-2005, 03:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Can you show me your tentative algebra? Associativity, commutativity, distributativity, identity, inversibility, etc?
I will write a paper. But I have no time neough to think much about it, for now.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Identifying the Gravitational Constant davidgow77 Physics Articles 3 05-28-2008 01:26 PM
Fitz'slatest revision of what Force, Space and Time really are in the wave world. Robert Duncan TOE Theories 3 02-18-2008 01:44 AM
Fitzpatrick's Vector Scalar relationship between Force, Space and Time Robert Duncan Forces of Nature 2 04-22-2006 05:03 PM
squaring Lorentz force AntonioLao Mathematics 12 02-21-2006 12:00 PM
like attraction iseason Forces of Nature 20 12-19-2005 11:51 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com