LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksLorentz force of electromagnetism is a force of the future. The light at the end of the tunnel.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 29
- 12-22-2005, 02:19 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Lorentz force is a force of the future
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 12-22-2005, 05:02 PM #2The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
Do you mean that all electromagnetism will eventually becom Lorenz force?
If so, what is Lorenz force made of?
- 12-27-2005, 01:42 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
EM force is the same as Lorentz
Lorentz force is the same force as electromagnetic force. It is the sum of electric force and magnetic force.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 12-27-2005, 03:20 PM #4The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
I've been doing many mathematical workings which have taken me to an important discoverment towards EM being unified with Gravity throughout the electromagnetic equations and spetial relativity.
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 12-27-2005, 03:29 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
how about general relativity?
Aren't you forgetting the nonlinear field equations of general relativity?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 12-27-2005, 03:33 PM #6The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
No. But GR's math leads to complications with QM. Whiles if I do a re-unification of Maxwell and young Einstein, I could avoid older Einstein's problem with Bohr, Heisenberg and all the other quantum guys, and therefore be nearrer to a TOE. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I've decided to adopt this method because it's easier to re-formulate one of the halfs than putting them to gether form how they are, specially if I don't want to go into illusionary theories: strings, aether...
- 12-27-2005, 03:42 PM #7Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
Poincare group or Lorentz group?
Are you then using the more general Poincare group instead of the usual Lorentz group? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincare_group
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 12-28-2005, 06:16 AM #8The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
Still haven't gone on to that. But up to what I see, neither of them satisfy my math, so I wil have to develop a "Garridonian Group" which is good enough. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 12-28-2005, 12:09 PM #9Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,778
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
algebra
Can you show me your tentative algebra? Associativity, commutativity, distributativity, identity, inversibility, etc? Originally Posted by GUILLE Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 12-28-2005, 03:29 PM #10The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
I will write a paper. But I have no time neough to think much about it, for now. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Fitz'slatest revision of what Force, Space and Time really are in the wave world.
By Robert Duncan in forum TOE TheoriesReplies: 3Last Post: 02-18-2008, 01:44 AM -
Fitzpatrick's Vector Scalar relationship between Force, Space and Time
By Robert Duncan in forum Forces of NatureReplies: 2Last Post: 04-22-2006, 05:03 PM -
squaring Lorentz force
By AntonioLao in forum MathematicsReplies: 12Last Post: 02-21-2006, 12:00 PM -
like attraction
By iseason in forum Forces of NatureReplies: 20Last Post: 12-19-2005, 11:51 AM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
