Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page natural asymmetry
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
natural asymmetry
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
natural asymmetry - 12-27-2005, 01:31 PM

For perfect symmetry, physical configuration must be of equal number of particle and antiparticle of equal mass, for example, electron and positron but of opposite electric charge. However, the immediate measurable universe is predominantly composed of ordinary elementary particles not extraordinary antiparticles. Nevertheless, all neutral atoms and molecules are made from opposite electric charges, by conventional agreement, +1e for proton and -1e for electron. The proton is further subdivided into its quark constituents 2 up’s (each +2/3e) and 1 down (-1/3e). Bear in mind that nucleosynthesis requires the existence of neutrons (2 down’s and 1 up quark) in order for nature to form heavier nuclei starting with that of helium. The nonexistence of di-proton implies that the strong nuclear force is repulsive if the protons are separated by less than 1 fermi. It would have been a perfect symmetry if the stable proton mass is equal to the stable electron mass instead of the ratio 1836 to 1. Therefore broken symmetry is a consequence of mass disparity not electric charge inequality. This disparity implies that the electric moment vector is not orthogonal to the magnetic moment vector for each massive fermions and bosons. However, for massless fermions and bosons the vector moments are orthogonal.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-27-2005, 03:42 PM

Do you mean that there is more matter than anti.matter in the universe because the proton (and thus the anti-proton, we could call it negton, to shorten) has more mass than the electron (and thus positron)? It doesn't make sense, how could the mass of the particles affect there is more matter if the number of protons was hypothetically equal at the begining to the number of negtons?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
does not make sense for 1 universe
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
does not make sense for 1 universe - 12-27-2005, 03:47 PM

These do not make sense if we theorize a single universe but make more sense if we assume dual universes.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-27-2005, 03:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
These do not make sense if we theorize a single universe but make more sense if we assume dual universes.
My theory to explain Entropy, expansion, anti-matter/matter proportions... And several other cosmological phenomena and characteristics is also based on two universes. Ours expands as the other one contracts. The black holes and white holes are opposite in that universe, and all take you there. Because that universe is smaller, the black holes are nearer to matter, so more matter is taken in and comes here than goes there. The thing is that there there is more anti-matter and thus they deposite anti-matter here instead of matter. But I hadn't given an explanation about why this difference was, and now you've given me a good one.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
strong force
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
strong force - 12-28-2005, 11:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
But I hadn't given an explanation about why this difference was, and now you've given me a good one.
That strong force is repulsive below 1 fermi? But what about its effect at the Planck length?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-28-2005, 03:07 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
That strong force is repulsive below 1 fermi? But what about its effect at the Planck length?
No, the good hint I mean is that there is more matter here due to the electric charge instead of due to the mass.

How many plancks is 1 fermi? (or 1 planck how many fermis?)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
colinearity?
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
colinearity? - 12-29-2005, 12:56 PM

Quote:
No, the good hint I mean is that there is more matter here due to the electric charge instead of due to the mass.
recall the paper on the electric origin of mass, more matter means that the electric field and the magnetic field are colinear. 1 fermi is 10^{-15} meter. 1 Planck length is 10^{-35} meter. There are 10^{20} Planck unit of length in 1 fermi.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-29-2005, 01:13 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
recall the paper on the electric origin of mass, more matter means that the electric field and the magnetic field are colinear.
What do you mean by colinear? That they are paralle lines?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
1 fermi is 10^{-15} meter. 1 Planck length is 10^{-35} meter. There are 10^{20} Planck unit of length in 1 fermi.
Thanks for the number. It's interesting to see how there is such a big difference between these two units of length, and yet the are just at consecutive studies (after the atom-nucleus size of fermis, there is no transition point of size of study, we go directly into quantum planck length). 1 step, but 10^20 times.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
same direction
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
same direction - 12-29-2005, 01:23 PM

Colinearity means the same direction along the same line but not necessarily the same origin.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
12-29-2005, 01:26 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Colinearity means the same direction along the same line but not necessarily the same origin.
Hummm... But really E and M come fromt he same origin, so how can this be?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A consuming fire-are you hungry!! mkirkpatrick Cosmology 19 03-16-2006 10:29 PM
are there natural bisectors? AntonioLao Chaos 2 02-08-2006 01:09 PM
Humans vs. Animals baudrunner General Biology 5 01-28-2006 08:41 PM
religious contradiction subversion General Discussion 5 12-04-2005 04:45 AM
Natural selection and the probability of the universe TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 4 11-13-2005 11:11 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com