Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    natural asymmetry

    For perfect symmetry, physical configuration must be of equal number of particle and antiparticle of equal mass, for example, electron and positron but of opposite electric charge. However, the immediate measurable universe is predominantly composed of ordinary elementary particles not extraordinary antiparticles. Nevertheless, all neutral atoms and molecules are made from opposite electric charges, by conventional agreement, +1e for proton and -1e for electron. The proton is further subdivided into its quark constituents 2 up’s (each +2/3e) and 1 down (-1/3e). Bear in mind that nucleosynthesis requires the existence of neutrons (2 down’s and 1 up quark) in order for nature to form heavier nuclei starting with that of helium. The nonexistence of di-proton implies that the strong nuclear force is repulsive if the protons are separated by less than 1 fermi. It would have been a perfect symmetry if the stable proton mass is equal to the stable electron mass instead of the ratio 1836 to 1. Therefore broken symmetry is a consequence of mass disparity not electric charge inequality. This disparity implies that the electric moment vector is not orthogonal to the magnetic moment vector for each massive fermions and bosons. However, for massless fermions and bosons the vector moments are orthogonal.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Do you mean that there is more matter than anti.matter in the universe because the proton (and thus the anti-proton, we could call it negton, to shorten) has more mass than the electron (and thus positron)? It doesn't make sense, how could the mass of the particles affect there is more matter if the number of protons was hypothetically equal at the begining to the number of negtons?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    does not make sense for 1 universe

    These do not make sense if we theorize a single universe but make more sense if we assume dual universes.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    These do not make sense if we theorize a single universe but make more sense if we assume dual universes.
    My theory to explain Entropy, expansion, anti-matter/matter proportions... And several other cosmological phenomena and characteristics is also based on two universes. Ours expands as the other one contracts. The black holes and white holes are opposite in that universe, and all take you there. Because that universe is smaller, the black holes are nearer to matter, so more matter is taken in and comes here than goes there. The thing is that there there is more anti-matter and thus they deposite anti-matter here instead of matter. But I hadn't given an explanation about why this difference was, and now you've given me a good one.

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    strong force

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    But I hadn't given an explanation about why this difference was, and now you've given me a good one.
    That strong force is repulsive below 1 fermi? But what about its effect at the Planck length?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    That strong force is repulsive below 1 fermi? But what about its effect at the Planck length?
    No, the good hint I mean is that there is more matter here due to the electric charge instead of due to the mass.

    How many plancks is 1 fermi? (or 1 planck how many fermis?)

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    colinearity?

    No, the good hint I mean is that there is more matter here due to the electric charge instead of due to the mass.
    recall the paper on the electric origin of mass, more matter means that the electric field and the magnetic field are colinear. 1 fermi is 10^{-15} meter. 1 Planck length is 10^{-35} meter. There are 10^{20} Planck unit of length in 1 fermi.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    recall the paper on the electric origin of mass, more matter means that the electric field and the magnetic field are colinear.
    What do you mean by colinear? That they are paralle lines?

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    1 fermi is 10^{-15} meter. 1 Planck length is 10^{-35} meter. There are 10^{20} Planck unit of length in 1 fermi.
    Thanks for the number. It's interesting to see how there is such a big difference between these two units of length, and yet the are just at consecutive studies (after the atom-nucleus size of fermis, there is no transition point of size of study, we go directly into quantum planck length). 1 step, but 10^20 times.

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    same direction

    Colinearity means the same direction along the same line but not necessarily the same origin.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    Colinearity means the same direction along the same line but not necessarily the same origin.
    Hummm... But really E and M come fromt he same origin, so how can this be?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Humans vs. Animals
    By baudrunner in forum General Biology
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-09-2009, 01:05 AM
  2. A consuming fire-are you hungry!!
    By mkirkpatrick in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-16-2006, 10:29 PM
  3. are there natural bisectors?
    By AntonioLao in forum Chaos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-08-2006, 01:09 PM
  4. religious contradiction
    By subversion in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-04-2005, 04:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top