fiction fizzles fickler

[AntonioLao]

There are more books about science fictions than books about science facts. A super prosperous multibillion dollars industry feed by sci-fi is accepting the undeniable survey poll that more people specially the younger generation enjoy watching movies loaded with kaleidoscopic fantasy than its counterpart of vivid reality.

It seems admissible to many people that in order to develop a healthy mind the human psyche needs to make choices between a set of relative antinomies, the lists that follow are just a few examples of a very large set of relative antitheses: continuity-vacuity, activity-passivity, incongruity-congruity, speed-constancy, acceleration-uniformity, chaos-order, linear-curved, spiral-circle, talk-listen, write-think, seeing-believing, accept-reject, adapt-change, anorexia-bulimia, attach-detach, beauty-ugly, big-small, borrow-lend, bright-dark, good-bad, check-balance, city-town, coffee-tea, Coke-Pepsi, comedy-tragedy, laugh-cry, concrete-abstract, correct-wrong, cream-butter, credit-debit, cute-mean, damnation-salvation, dance-sit, deep-shallow, democracy-communism, discriminate-incriminate, doctor-patient, doggy-kitty, donut-cookie, early-late, earning-gift, emotion-volition, expand-contract, explore-implore, extrovert-introvert, fight-run, far-near, fork-spoon, formal-casual, fry-bake, genuine-imitation, give-take, gun-knife, happiness-sorrow, hard-soft, hawk-dove, hide-seek, honor-shame, hope-despair, hot-cold, ideas-opinion, illegal drug or medicine, implicit-explicit, induce-deduce, industry-laziness, inflate-deflate, insurance-assurance, inhibit-exhibit, inner space or outer space, interview-review, lead-follow, knowledge-wealth, love-hate, male-female, loyalty-betrayal, metaphor-simile, newspaper-internet, night-day, open-closed, owner-guest, pay-steal, produce-consume, give-take, safe-danger, lust-virtue, smart-stupid, start-stop, swallow-vomit, tall-short, teach-learn, true-false, verbal-literal, war-peace, wet-dry, winner-loser, work-play, zero-infinity, begin-end, life-death…However without the power of choice it is living in never-never land idly listening to a never ending story. The powerful effect of bedtime stories, songs of lullaby, sooth, smooth, peacefully into the calm silent realm of Roman god Somnus.

A choice less fantasy land of fiction is a place where there are no rules or laws limiting physical, biological, psychological, or moral consequences. Everything is possible! In this land there is no TOE. For a theory is nothing else but a prelude or a magnetic compass needle pointing to this side of rationality from the other side of extreme irrationality. But quantum propagandists not good at keeping secrets have been spreading the news regardless of the harm or benefit to the general public that facts are stranger than fictions.

These are the facts of quantum mechanics: absolute uncertainty, probability wave functions, conjugate variables, non-commutation rules, quantum vacuum fluctuation and polarization, wave-particle duality, quantum jumps, empty orbital, quantum tunneling, Bell’s inequality, and spooky nonlocality. All these unrealities presuppose the truth about virtual reality that life is just a period of dreamless awakening of endless dream and endless sleep.

[Guille]

My main argument against dialectics is my sentence "Dualism doesn't impply opposition". If I can prove it, not only the believe that dialectics is aplicable to everything falls, but also it would give the hope for a future of agreement (as, for example, it would mean that the fact that there are two different political parties doesn't mean they must be enemies).

The important thing about all this is that several of your dual examples are not absolute therefore don't impply opposition. "gun or knife" for example. There could be other things: there could be an axe, etz. So not neccesarilly gun and knife are opposites, therefore not neccesarilly there is opposition between them.

Just like the fact that gravity pushes past and EM pushes future doesn't mean their opposite. There could be a force pushing to present.

[AntonioLao]

"gun or knife"

Gun is inpersonal while knife is personal. Gun can be used at a distance but knife is done up close body contact. Wars can be fought more cowardly by guns but courageously by swords or knife in a one to one duel. This is the same as deciding whether to say 'hello' when meeting a stranger or to walk away farther in the other direction avoiding any controntation. In the domain of the atom I don't know whether electrons protons act according to a choice to attract or to repel?

[Guille]

Gun is inpersonal while knife is personal. Gun can be used at a distance but knife is done up close body contact. Wars can be fought more cowardly by guns but courageously by swords or knife in a one to one duel. This is the same as deciding whether to say 'hello' when meeting a stranger or to walk away farther in the other direction avoiding any controntation. In the domain of the atom I don't know whether electrons protons act according to a choice to attract or to repel?

Niether do I. About what you said, applied to physics: those that discuss in a debate are using "knifes" and those that conversate through articles by stating opposing views are using "guns". I don't see one better than the other, or more proudfull. They are just different methods. But the system is always the same.

[AntonioLao]

But the system is always the same.

I request more details in this statement.

[Guille]

I request more details in this statement.

It's a very complex metaphysical foundation I've developed for months. It started with my reading of Baudrillard but then I read Foucault and added lots of things, and then I read Deleuze and added even more. I intent to post a short article of it all soon.

Basicall there are 2 times. One time changes of being, of entity. The other time changes the forms, the manifestation, but the entity is the same. The time that changes the being is the time of time, the time sqaured. Whiles the time that changes form is the time of space, that of which we normally speak about. The relationship between them is kliek your energy and sqaure of energy relationship.

A system is always the same, if there is a different manifestation, there is a different system, it's another system. Whiles the method is always the same, within a same system. Then only thing is that the method modifies during the period within one system. Then there is the third concept which I stil don't have the exact word, its hard to think an appropiate, but it is the time of time and space, the time of system and method, that is, it is always the same and changes. Then I made parallelism between this idea and others. But it's all a bit long, and I have to perfection vocabulary and explanation, it will be good on the article.

By the way did you recieve my PM?

[AntonioLao]

By the way did you recieve my PM?

I printed out your PM message. Will be studying them tonight reply asap. Now it's time for me to go work. See you later.

[mkirkpatrick]

There seems to be an inner truth,personal to you,then there seemsto be an outer truth,which is impersonal,but is ageed to be right by many individuals.
What is truth to me,might very well be fiction to another,so what can one do?
To methereis the old adage To thine own self be true,if within me I really feel
a thing to be true,and although it is denied by others,I would try and hold steadfast to my inner conviction.if I cannot be true to me then how will I ever be true to you?


regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

I am not sure I would call your definition of outer truth "truth". Just because things are agreed upon by different individuals, doesn't make it "true". I agree that personal truth is THE truth.
I don't agree with the idea that there are 2 different times. If there are more time streams than we are aware of, I am not sure why it would be limited to 2, my guess is that it would be infinite.