Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    virtual particles need TLC

    How can limitless energy be derived from the boundless vacuum? How can everlasting love be received from emotionless supernatural being? The answer might be surprising. It is just tender loving care (TLC).

    In the past, brute force was used extracting the tooth decay of massive weak vector bosons. This brutishness is the sole purpose of all merciless colliders. But a gentle way is to understand that like humans, elementary particles also need TLC. That is they too need a partner for exchanging and sharing affections. It is understood that this side of reality there are uncountable single left-handed neutrinos looking for TLC. In theory, symmetry of physical equations, there should be equal number of right-handed neutrinos on the other side of virtual reality searching for the one and only fulfillment for their empty lives. The go-betweens or matchmakers are the gregarious extroverted photons (real or virtual).

    Casimir device is a unique way of selecting virtual photons for their appearance on reality TV. However, a modified one could also, in theory, coax two more virtual neutrinos. This is the absolute minimum number of virtual particles crossing the dimensional stream for appearing center stage in Time Square (1 virtual photon and 2 virtual neutrinos). Fundamental wavelengths are 2/3 and 1/3 with harmonics integer multiples of 2/3 and 1/3.

    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: virtual particles need TLC

    We all need TLC some more than others,does emotion and love equate,or are they
    completely different?prehaps emotion exist only the relative sense,and not in the absolute
    sense.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    emotion exist only the relative sense
    Secondary attractive forces (e.g. gravity and electromagnetism) are responsible for all human emotion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Secondary attractive forces (e.g. gravity and electromagnetism) are responsible for all human emotion.
    Attraction seems to be the other side of repulsion,bit like love and hate!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Attraction seems to be the other side of repulsion
    Attractive forces could be found globally while repulsive forces are effective locally.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Attractive forces could be found globally while repulsive forces are effective locally.
    Are not these motions related,in that they are circular,attract this spin,repel on the next?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Are not these motions related
    Motions in particular that are described by the 3 fundamental conservation laws: (1) energy conservation, (2) linear momentum conservation, and (3) angular momentum conservation.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Motions in particular that are described by the 3 fundamental conservation laws: (1) energy conservation, (2) linear momentum conservation, and (3) angular momentum conservation.

    Three fundamentals that exhibit conservation,but if we look really deeply at these three
    we will then find just one fundamental force.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    we will then find just one fundamental force.
    Hate repeating myself but this has to be the one and only repulsive primary force.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: virtual particles need TLC

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Hate repeating myself but this has to be the one and only repulsive primary force.

    Absolutely the one and only!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Fundamental Particles
    By Guille in forum Quantum Physics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-08-2008, 12:14 PM
  2. The story about Existence born from Emptiness.
    By socratus in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-25-2006, 10:28 PM
  3. Question.
    By socratus in forum Spacetime
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 02-20-2006, 10:02 AM
  4. About Reference Systems: Vacuum and Space.
    By socratus in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-19-2006, 01:25 PM
  5. God, Particles and Antiparticles.
    By socratus in forum Intelligent Design
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-01-2006, 08:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top