What is gravity?

[SinJin]

This always confused me. Einstein said that gravity was the warping of space. That a body, such as the Earth, literally bends space so objects can fall towards it, like what a marble would do if it were sitting in jell-o. Then there's the thing about gravitons, carrier particles that transmit the attraction of gravity, much like the other force particles of electromagnetism and the strong and weak nuclear bonds. What I don't get is the fact that these two theories seem completely different, and I would think it's either one or the other. But hasn't Einstein's theory been proven? Hasn't it been proven that space does warp, and that gravity is the product felt when objects fall into these warps? So how would the gravitons fit in? If an object is already falling into the warp, like a meteorite falling towards Earth, then why would there also be particles, gravitons, transmitting an attractive force? In fact I'll go one step further and say that if the Earth is warping space, and gravity is objects falling into that warp, then there really is no attraction being produced, but instead just objects following the curved path of space. Can someone help me out with this line of thinking? Thanks.

[dleviwing]

Einstein was wrong. His math works but his interpretation of the numbers and terms are pure BS. To follow the functionality of the math, simply view space as a physical entity of a fundamental substance. Gravity is a flow of this substance (spatial matter) as the structured form of this substance (subatomic matter) causes the spatial matter to condense to a higher spatial density. It basically has to do with the conversion of randomize wave function motion to uniform motion. Don't believe all the Einstein hype. Read the publications by those who actually performed experimentation and collected the data. I don't think Einstein ever performed and experiment; he was just an idea man and not a real scientist.

[HIGGSBOSONS]

I think up till now we are not able to understand gravity and we just supporting the ideas of big names like Newton and Einstein because theory of gravity violates the conservation of energy. The energy conservation is a pillar of science. Objects like earth orbiting for millions or so years producing motion with expenditure of energy and there is no change that occurs in the of force of gravity – why? Can anybody explain this? Not only gravity but also strong force also violates conservation of energy.

[mkirkpatrick]

Gravity is basically the loving embrace of Ying and Yang, rotating to the tune of the universal vortex, holding all in its embrace of energy distribution on the ubiquitous and multi-dimensional levels of expression!

kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Michael, are you saying that gravity is basically attraction? If so, and every action has an equal and opposite reaction, what's the reaction? still looking for balance...

[dleviwing]

Gravity is basically the loving embrace of Ying and Yang, rotating to the tune of the universal vortex, holding all in its embrace of energy distribution on the ubiquitous and multi-dimensional levels of expression!

This sounds like a romantic trip through a “tunnel of love” as we’re flushed down the universal drain (vortex). Do you have a viable opinion as to what gravity is and its cause?

[mkirkpatrick]

Harmony,I will try and answer your question,and Dave,you said about the
tunnel of love,and being flushed away down the vortex!very humorous Dave!
Makes me feel all warm inside,know what I mean?
To understand gravity,you also need to understand,that there is but,one
energy,one force "within this universe"that one energy is expressed in two
opposing aspects,positive=attraction=love!And negitive-repulsion=hate-dislike.or more succinctly,Ying and Yang!And that the universal law that
"permits" and actions these motionings,is the vortex!Without the presence
of a vortex,gravity could NOT function.Gravity is a Bye-product of Ying and
Yang,as the opposites spin,they create force,as a direct result,and that is
gravity.Gravity will only ever be understood when we see it for what itis?
And not for what we think it might be!Understand the vortex,consider the Ying and Yang,see the implications,they are plain to see if one opens ones eyes.and mind,to see through "eyes anew"?

kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Thanks for your reply Michael, I still don't know what you think is the opposing force to gravity though...

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks for your reply Michael, I still don't know what you think is the opposing force to gravity though...

Harmony.There is no opposing force at all,what one is aware of is the same force at different ends of the spectrum,not the best word I know,but it will do for now.attraction and repulsion are the same force,like a magnet!Both
are caught up "within"the embrace of the spirraling vortex,one way is attract
the other is repel,simple,but can and does appear complex?To understand
these motionings,one must stand well clearof the box that science is firmily
trapped in!But there is hope,and light on the horizon.

kind regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

A brief extract from the paper by Lew price,Is there a dynamic ether?
Quote,"New proof of gravity,there is another proof for gravity for those
patient enough to listen and astute enough to follow the logic presented.This
proof is the nature ofgravity.When one understands what produces the
acceleration we call gravity,the understanding is proof of the existance of
dynamic ether.This is because the dynamic ether causes gravity.
If the electron is a vortex,very likely other subatomic entities which compose
matter are also vortices or combinations of vortices(with the exception of
neutrinos if one considers them to be components of matter).If matter is
composed of vortices,the ether flowing into each vortex and into large
concentrations of vortices (such as our planet)would be an accelerating force,moving objects toward the vortex or the vortices.In the case of many vortices together,the inflow of ether would be extreme"Unquote.
Ominipresence must be the property of the dynamic ether,there is no
escape from this conclusion.

regards michael.