Gravity and Inertia

[Tesla]

http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0103/0103044.pdf

[mkirkpatrick]

We must be careful,Tesla,there are other threads still active with regard
gravity and its cousin inertia,we do not need any more do we!
To me gravity is made possible via the courtesy of two opposing votexes,and
the inertia is the resistance between the two!Simple but somewhat complex
to grasp?


regards michael.

[Tesla]

"Join our community of researchers, students and others from around the world on a common quest, who come here to discuss a wide range of issues related to the Theory of Everything. You are currently viewing our boards as our guest which gives you read-only access to most discussions, with limited access to many other features. By joining our free community you can post new topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, start your own journal, choose an avatar and access many other special features..".

By not discussing what I post as a thread does not in any way make me any less of a member or negatively affect this sites objective.

but my friend you put very little of YOU

I was not aware that I had to; because I don't. They are thread starters and I start them with an interesting article it's up to others to post on them if they have a question or opinion.

Micheal you know there's a pm button you can click to side chat. Why do it on someones thread? It's disrespectful. I don't enjoy posting off topic comments and try to avoid doing just that. Just hit the thanks icon and if that's not enough then use the pm feature. I could have done this but I decided to do this one publicly.

I have most likely offended you but please believe it was unintentional. I'm just being up front.

I contribute what I can't and what I believe is postive. If I post nothing it's because I have nothing to say. Don't worry about me, please.

Good intentions,

Tesla

[humanbydefault]

It's been a long time since my last posting here... How are my good all friends? I hope that ok. For the new ones my best welcome to this forum.

I have been thinking the other day about a physical phenomenom that it is directly related to gravity: An Orbit around planets of moons!

Think about this! A regular satellite 9civilian or military one) will perform a circular [spherical] orbit around the Earth as we all take for granted. Have you ever asked yourself why? Why circular and not elliptical?
The reason is also logical>>> "Every single point in the [spherical] trajectory of a satellite or any other orbiting object around a planet present a common feature you may have not taken into a serious thought: Equal space-time values!
Yes! As a satellite moves around the Earth it follows a path that holds equal space-time characteristics in each and every point.
The question is:
Why the Earth itself moves around the Sun in a evident elliptical configutation [pattern] instead of one spherical one?
In this case TOO Earth follows a trajectory where each and every point of the path present equal space-time characteristics... BECAUSE OF THE MOON!
It is the presence of our moon what makes the path "imperfect" [considering perfect a "perfect circle"].
Woundn't be logical to assume that a planet with just one moon would present a rather elliptical orbit around stars?


This is all for today.... Think about it and find out the answers.

HBD

[Tesla]

Could your thoughts relate to gravity as Einstein described it; as a mass 'sitting' in the fabric of space time (like the sun) and then as a result the earth makes revolutions around it (like a penny revolving around the hole of one of those charity funnels). Could aether tie into this?

Tesla

[humanbydefault]

It's the same for me.
Aether is not what earlier physicists thought [including our friend Einstein].
The real aether is constantly changing both in density and physical topology as time elapses. You could see it as a sort of warping of the "space-time" as Einstein preferred back then or simply as a variable configuration of energies in a region of space... the same to me.
Understanding gravity requires the basics in the understanding of electro-magnetism in its nature. Remember that both are variables in response to the square of the distance from an object... The reason for that is not a coincidence [as many physicists try to put it in context].
But if you wish you could explain magnetism with the same argument if you considered the "lines of force" as a aether configuration that causes the attraction or rejection in the presence of another object.
It's so funny1 Physicists argue that gravity is different than magnetism since in gravity you could only find ATTRACTION and never rejection... have you ever thought about how childish the whole argument was?
If you could be superman for a while and be able to actually move the planet Earth from its orbit lets say closer to the sun what would you think you would witness?
The Earth would be immidiately pushed away from the new orbit you chose and forced back into the one we know as the regular one... But why?
Because the aether [you mentioned above] is not actually "designed" to hold the planet outside of its regular orbit. We could "play" with magnets since their size is like a toy in comparison to our bodies. Could anyone ever tried to move a planet or a moon to actually prove that gravity [known as the reason planets move around a star] is just a "ONE-WAY" phenomenon? Of course not!
Think about it and you'll see my point here.
until our next.
HBD

[dleviwing]

If you are looking for the opposite force to gravity, it is “Expansion” or destructive wave interference where gravity is “Constructive” wave interference. Both are functions of the Aether.

HBD;

The Earth would be immediately pushed away from the new orbit you chose and forced back into the one we know as the regular one... But why?

I don’t think this would happen!!!

[gautam]

Do you think if we are at the periphery of the universe then,the stars will be moving towards us since they are going away from us now? Or there will be some antigravity working there? To me and according to Mest Theory, No.
The universe will be seen expanding from any point of the universe.
The spatial infinity at every point is curved to meet the the quantum infinity. Causing from a partcle to a glaxy and the universe to move in spiral motion.
The universe is thus seen expanding from any point.
Regards
Gautam

[Tesla]

If you are looking for the opposite force to gravity, it is “Expansion” or destructive wave interference where gravity is “Constructive” wave interference. Both are functions of the Aether.

Are both funtions working under the same phenomenon (gravity)? I think not (unless someone could explain to me why they are). May be equal and opposite reaction?

Do you guys think gravity is pushing us to the earth or does it pull?

[Tesla]

Actually, now that I think about it, I believe that spin is the opposing action of gravity not expansion. What do you all think?