Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    frictionless contact

    When the normal or perpendicular components of the contact forces are all identically zero, the contact becomes frictionless. In addition, if the tangential or parallel components are also identically zero then a true vacuum emerged. This is where interactions between matter and energy do not exist, a state of pure nothingness – the true vacuum. However, empirical data of quantum fluctuation make it almost impossible for true vacuum to exist. This is verified by the quantized normal modes of quantum field theories.

    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: frictionless contact

    The true vacuum then I believe does exist,but not in this physical universe,it exist on the
    other side of the point that is the gateway to the protyle atom,there within the absolute
    frictionless abode of absolute unity,all is still,absolute motionlessness,the reason there is no friction is elementally simple,no-thing moves!How could you possibly have movement
    when all is all and complete,then everywhere is here!ominipresent-ubiquitous,perfect-peace,that is beyond all understanding?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    735
    Blog Entries
    12
    Thanks Given
    137
    Thanked 162x in 138 Posts
    Rep Power
    28

    Re: frictionless contact

    Again I think we are usually averse to the word "non-existance" To say that a pure vacuum does not exist, is logical, why would nothing=something? It doesn't mean however that we can not use place holder for a void, thereby signifying that non-existance has a quantity, but lacks any quality.

    Also I agree with you that from our perspective there is no such thing as non flucuating vacuum, however from the vacuum's perspective there is no such thing as a self flucuation I can assure.
    Last edited by theunify; 02-26-2007 at 09:49 AM. Reason: http://WwW.theUnificationTheory.com

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    The true vacuum then I believe does exist
    By the existence of its tangential components of the contact force which can only be indirectly detected by the quantum fluctuations of its normal components.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    By the existence of its tangential components of the contact force which can only be indirectly detected by the quantum fluctuations of its normal components.
    Absolutely,it is the same with the etheric field,which can only be detected by inference.



    regards michael,
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    which can only be detected by inference.
    Fine and dandy as long as no one committed a type I alpha error or a type II beta error.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Fine and dandy as long as no one committed a type I alpha error or a type II beta error.
    That is an interesting point,we will have to hope that this is so,then we will be fine and dandy!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    we will have to hope that this is so
    If absolute certainty is possible then who needs the science of statistics or the mathematics of probability?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    If absolute certainty is possible then who needs the science of statistics or the mathematics of probability?

    Who indeed?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: frictionless contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Who indeed?
    Those who constantly doubt and those who forget easily.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. time infinities separated by contact
    By AntonioLao in forum Time Travel
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-15-2005, 06:58 PM
  2. contact transformation of spacetime events
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-18-2005, 12:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top