Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    simultaneous contact

    Events occurring at the same time and space are simultaneous contact events.
    These contact points cannot be associated with a coordinate system since the vector sum of all possible contact forces is identically zero. However, technically, the events are all at rest and there is no sequence of temporal order. As stated elsewhere, a force free environment is also a coordinate free environment. This is the same as the rest frame of simultaneous events in Einstein’s special relativity forming a mass free universe which is fundamentally inertia free and interactionless analogous to the true vacuum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Events occurring at the same time and space are simultaneous contact events.
    These contact points cannot be associated with a coordinate system since the vector sum of all possible contact forces is identically zero. However, technically, the events are all at rest and there is no sequence of temporal order. As stated elsewhere, a force free environment is also a coordinate free environment. This is the same as the rest frame of simultaneous events in Einstein’s special relativity forming a mass free universe which is fundamentally inertia free and interactionless analogous to the true vacuum.
    Antonio,in a "true" vacuum would anything all ever happen?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    in a "true" vacuum would anything all ever happen?
    The false vacuum interacts weakly but nothing can be said about the true vacuum since it does not interact at all. My conjecture is that the true vacuum is the seat of primary repulsive truly equal forces.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The false vacuum interacts weakly but nothing can be said about the true vacuum since it does not interact at all. My conjecture is that the true vacuum is the seat of primary repulsive truly equal forces.
    Are you saying repulsive only?Or are you including attractive ones as well?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Are you saying repulsive only?
    equal forces are always repulsive (equal in magnitude and direction). On the other hand, if they are not equal (either magnitude or direction) then they are attractive.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    equal forces are always repulsive (equal in magnitude and direction). On the other hand, if they are not equal (either magnitude or direction) then they are attractive.
    So the balancing of forces relies on a neutral ally!


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    So the balancing of forces relies on a neutral ally!
    This make sense. For the weak interaction, it is possibly the Z0 boson. For the atom, it is the neutron.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    This make sense. For the weak interaction, it is possibly the Z0 boson. For the atom, it is the neutron.
    That makes sense to me,however I am wary of bosons,as one winked at me once,and made me feel uncomfortable?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    one winked at me once
    Something got in the eye, maybe a tiny dust particle.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: simultaneous contact

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Something got in the eye, maybe a tiny dust particle.

    I never considered that possibility,thank you,I feel more at ease now!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Simultaneous Incarnations?
    By michellemfry in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-06-2009, 12:22 PM
  2. frictionless contact
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-06-2007, 01:03 PM
  3. compact vs. contact
    By AntonioLao in forum General Physics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-26-2007, 09:57 AM
  4. time infinities separated by contact
    By AntonioLao in forum Time Travel
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-15-2005, 06:58 PM
  5. contact transformation of spacetime events
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-18-2005, 12:40 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top