Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    physical constraints

    It is the same as a force, not one for initiating motion but to stop it, otherwise known also as non-centralized resistance, friction, or viscosity. In any case, physical constraints actually reduce the number of degrees of freedom for all system they applied to.

    They could be classified into external and internal constraints. These classifications become progressively more influential as the number of particles increases. However, usually, is the case, in classical dynamics, the internal constraints were ignored mostly in various critical analyses. This is more so in the theory of rigid bodies motion. Further classifications led to holonomic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holonomic , nonholonomic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonholonomic_system , scleronomic, and rheonomic systems. For the sake of theoretical investigations, both gravity and electromagnetism could be fundamentally subjected to some sorts of long range external constraints, while weak and strong nuclear forces subjected to short range internal constraints. Now, however, all of these could be lumped into main effects of charge constraints. Gravity being dominated by the one and only gravitational charge (not the graviton but the theorized quantum of mass) Electromagnetism ruled by the interactions of positive and negative electric charge (no consensus exists as to what is the quantum of charge – even though the electron is considered as the lightest unit negative charge and the positron as the lightest unit positive charge). Weak force is described by combining gravity’s charge and electric charge constraints via Higgs mechanism, lastly, the three colored charge constraints for eight massless gluons of the strong nuclear force.

    Surprisingly, the vacuum state exists with its charge constraints perfectly neutralized. Only by careful and meticulous experimental verifications could quantum vacuum fluctuations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_fluctuation and quantum vacuum polarizations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization become evident within very brief time interval, leading to a few successful results showing Casimir Effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect , Lamb Shift http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb_shift , the states of positronium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium , and states of antihydrogen atom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antihydrogen . Nonetheless, further developments of complex antimatter: antihelium, antioxygen, anticarbon, etc, up to antiuranium appeared extremely difficult. The successful creation of complex antimatter could possibly await the discovery of negative gravitational charge constraints and the promise of limitless energy source from the vacuum depends upon a feasible process of transforming virtual particles into real particles permanently. Someone finding this process could also resolve the difficulty of hot and cold fusion research.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: physical constraints

    The successful creation of complex antimatter could possibly await the discovery of negative gravitational charge constraints and the promise of limitless energy source from the vacuum depends upon a feasible process of transforming virtual particles into real particles permanently. Someone finding this process could also resolve the difficulty of hot and cold fusion research.
    Hi Antonio;
    Is this what you intend as a discussion for your thread?
    David

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile

    Antonio,you are looking for the home of (auntie) I mean anti,I can tell you where they
    grow!You will find more antis than you can shake a stick at in the etheric realm.
    The Etheric realm exists slighty out of phase with the physical spacetime continuum
    and is where all anti matter,dark matter exist,they both co-exist and as they are out of
    phase with each other,occupy the same space.

    By leaving your physical body as in astral-traveling,you are moving then in the etheric
    world,that is why ghosts etc can walk through walls,they are out of phase with physical
    matter.

    regards michael.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 03-19-2007 at 05:02 PM.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: physical constraints

    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing
    Is this what you intend as a discussion for your thread?
    I would like to derive surplus energy from the vacuum if it is feasible.
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    I mean anti,I can tell you where they grow!
    personal research indicates that before anti, there is lefty then righty as what is all about parity. Parity is proved not conserving. This is really bothersome for any successful research.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  5. #5
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: physical constraints

    In a sense Antonio, we do that now when we use gravity to produce energy. I understand that you are referring to zero point energy systems, but unless we learn to travel near the speed of light with our collector, I don’t think we can harness it.
    David

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: physical constraints

    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing
    but unless we learn to travel near the speed of light with our collector, I don’t think we can harness it.
    People used to tell Hans G. Dehmelt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_G._Dehmelt and http://fermat.nap.edu/openbook/0309048931/html/45.html) the same thing before he isolated Priscilla for an indefinite period of time.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  7. #7
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: physical constraints

    Quite an interesting article Antonio. Unfortunately, as Feynman often commented, “we use the numbers without truly knowing what they mean”. Until we truly know what mass, charge, energy, magnetism and so on truly mean, we will be limited to the functions of the numbers in relation to the defined terms. The math works just fine, the interpretations are questionable. What if the only difference between a positron and an electron is nothing more than the fact that a positron is a odd wave-harmonic construct whereas an electron is an even wave-harmonic construct.
    David

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing
    What if the only difference between a positron and an electron is nothing more than the fact that a positron is a odd wave-harmonic construct whereas an electron is an even wave-harmonic construct.
    I thought the distinction is only the opposite electric charge.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 03-19-2007 at 05:03 PM.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  9. #9
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: physical constraints

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    I thought the distinction is only the opposite electric charge.
    Ah yes – charge; maybe charge is nothing more than the interactions of wave interference and harmonics with the particle’s own standing wave fundamental. Constructive and destructive wave interference.
    Last edited by dleviwing; 03-19-2007 at 05:05 PM.
    David

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: physical constraints

    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing
    maybe charge is nothing more than the interactions of wave interference and harmonics with the particle’s own standing wave fundamental.
    Now, theorists are working on a concept of charge constraint which make mass as the gravitational charge. But what would be the magnetic charge?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What is Physical Chemistry?
    By michellemfry in forum Chemistry
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-31-2006, 04:54 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-01-2005, 09:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top