Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    strong force radiates weakly

    One of the explanations is provided by the concept of asymptotic freedom, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptotic_freedom. Before its conceptualization, Friedman, Kendall, Taylor and associates at Stanford Linear Accelerator (SLAC) performed high-energy experiments proving the compositeness of protons. But the big surprise is that the quark components inside the proton are capable of transporting energy and momentum as do all free particles. Yet quarks are forever confined at effective distances of a few fermis freely singing unchained melody but never are freed of their romantic clutches. Since radiation is realized by complete freedom of motion in both space and time, this strongly suggests that quark’s motions are temporally free, not spatially. Quarks are materialized slaves with unbounded temporal freedom for eternity.


    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    The Observer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 146x in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    59

    Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Hi Antonio;
    Are you inferring that quarks have superluminal momentum? If so, I would have to agree. Quarks tend to indicate that “c” is just a quantum increment much like “h” is.
    David

  3. #3
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Then the strong force that radiates weakly is a misnomer,is it not?Radiation is giving off,
    even sharing?So being a slave is contrary to expansive law?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by dleviwing
    Are you inferring that quarks have superluminal momentum?
    Analogously as the entire universe has zero momentum, quarks momentum could be zero.
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Then the strong force that radiates weakly is a misnomer
    It's the mystery as indicated by asymptotic freedom.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Analogously as the entire universe has zero momentum, quarks momentum could be zero.

    It's the mystery as indicated by asymptotic freedom.

    Then we must solve this mystery Antonio,this is our next project?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #6
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Then we must solve this mystery
    The mystery is as good as solved if and only if we made the assumption that repulsive primary forces exist at the infinitesimal local region of spacetime.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The mystery is as good as solved if and only if we made the assumption that repulsive primary forces exist at the infinitesimal local region of spacetime.
    By God then Antonio,lets go assume this sucker?




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #8
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    lets go assume this sucker
    Then we would be making an "ass" of "u" and "me"
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  9. #9
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Then we would be making an "ass" of "u" and "me"
    It would not be the first time that this has happened?We must decide.



    regardsmichael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #10
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: strong force radiates weakly

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    We must decide.
    The decision is to reshuffle the letters and to explain why the "mass" of "u" is greater than "e".
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

 

 
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. why michelson/morey couldnt detect aethwe-revised
    By MANNY46 in forum General Physics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-02-2009, 03:00 AM
  2. Philosphical TOE (draft notes)
    By Jamesh in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 06:27 PM
  3. Aether Physics Model
    By volantis in forum General Physics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-23-2005, 04:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top