Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-26-2007, 02:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Let us hope then that they have no bullying tendencies?
The gluons are very strong tiny bullies but they are only effective at very short distances inside the nuclei or inside the quarks. The W's and Z's are very weak fat bullies also work at small distances. The gravitons never bother anybody. The photons are very friendly by helping everyone to see things even though they could be blind as a bat.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-26-2007, 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The gluons are very strong tiny bullies but they are only effective at very short distances inside the nuclei or inside the quarks. The W's and Z's are very weak fat bullies also work at small distances. The gravitons never bother anybody. The photons are very friendly by helping everyone to see things even though they could be blind as a bat.
Then we need a nuetralizer to combat these bullying tendencies,but also allow the
free flow of power.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-26-2007, 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Then we need a nuetralizer to combat these bullying tendencies
The only way this is possible is for a proton to die but that would be destroying ourselves since there are billions of protons in each of our bodies. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-26-2007, 05:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The only way this is possible is for a proton to die but that would be destroying ourselves since there are billions of protons in each of our bodies. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_decay
We are indestructable so no worries.Just because it has not been observed (proton decay)
does not mean that it does not happen,does it?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-27-2007, 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
That is only a blink of the eye for thr Absolute!
But it never happened at all. It could be longer. The failure is a big blow to the standard model of particle physics. My hunch is that gravity is responsible for it. See new thread on not only dogs go to heaven.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-27-2007, 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
But it never happened at all. It could be longer. The failure is a big blow to the standard model of particle physics. My hunch is that gravity is responsible for it. See new thread on not only dogs go to heaven.
I will certainly check it out.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Re: angular momentum of bosons -
03-26-2007, 02:27 PM
Linear Mode
