Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
| | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | nobody is perfect -
03-20-2007, 12:33 PM
Lasting perfection is something to strive for but never completely attained. In this context, it is achieving perfect rest or motionlessness. Without any help from the principle of relativity who can say that perfect rest is possible?
On the other hand, with help from relativity only inertial frames of reference could be at rest. Moreover, certain frames are allowed uniform motion with respect to others. In this second context, perfection means uniform constant speed and keeping the same direction. Constant speeds in 3D space are constant time derivative of distances. However, constant direction is only possible for time, say, from past to present to the future. It is true that even muons at .9994 speed of light live longer by a factor of 30 their direction in time is the same before, now, and after. The existence of fundamental forces does not allow constant direction in 3D space. This is true even in quantum mechanics with its different quantized spin directions.
In human context, a perfect person with perfect body, perfect memory, perfect vision, perfect hearing, perfect smell, and perfect sense would only last as long as that person’s life expectancy, give or take a hundred years.
In the universal context, it is perfectly logical to say that the universe is perfectly at rest. This is the same as saying that its total linear momentum is exactly zero.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
|  | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | 
03-20-2007, 01:17 PM
You are partially correct there Antonio,nobody is perfect,on the outside that is!That relative part of our outer appearence.
But the inner core of what we really are,that which is firmly embedded within the Absolute
is perfect,how could it really be anything but?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Last edited by dleviwing : 03-22-2007 at 02:25 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 |
03-20-2007, 01:29 PM
An absolutely perfect peace of mind?
My will is to solve the cold fusion problem by way of a theory of quantized space. Convincing the scientific community to finance a research with me as principal.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Last edited by dleviwing : 03-22-2007 at 02:27 PM.
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-20-2007, 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Convincing the scientific community to finance a research with me as principal. |
That will prove rather difficult,but not absolutely impossible,the main thing is being able
to sell the idea,have all the questions they will ask,answered?Have as much detail as you can,together as you portfolio to fusion steps one to ten?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-20-2007, 02:30 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick the main thing is being able to sell the idea,have all the questions they will ask,answered?Have as much detail as you can,together as you portfolio to fusion steps one to ten? | Assuming I have everything worked out it will still need a full time commitment. Impossible with my present situation. What I think is to write a paper acceptable by one of those scientific journals. I already did this. It was rejected. But that was three years ago. I have much better theoretical understanding today.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-20-2007, 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Assuming I have everything worked out it will still need a full time commitment. Impossible with my present situation. What I think is to write a paper acceptable by one of those scientific journals. I already did this. It was rejected. But that was three years ago. I have much better theoretical understanding today. |
Then go for it my friend.persistence pays off,wear them down,with your enthusiasm,try
and find a university that will take risks,what about Rice university,they have done work
with superconductivity,and are aquainted with fusion?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-20-2007, 02:46 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick wear them down,with your enthusiasm,try and find a university that will take risks | I tried that a long time ago. All they wanted is my money and signing up for their dubious graduate programs. At that time it was fiber optics. In hindsight I now realized I made a mistake. I should have went into fiber optics. Just look at what it has become? Could have been a millionaire today. But one of my friends doing it was murdered.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-20-2007, 02:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao I tried that a long time ago. All they wanted is my money and signing up for their dubious graduate programs. At that time it was fiber optics. In hindsight I now realized I made a mistake. I should have went into fiber optics. Just look at what it has become? Could have been a millionaire today. But one of my friends doing it was murdered. |
Sorry to hear that Antonio,you do though need a connection,trying to be at the right place at the right time,not easy,but is possible.Keep on trying and persisting.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,109
Thanks Given: 641
Thanked 97x in 96 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 71 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-21-2007, 11:50 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick need a connection | The director of the learning center where I work as a parttime math instructor gave me an internet printout yesterday, announcing the successful mapping of a mathematical structure known as E8. Few minutes ago searching the site at Wikipedia, I realized that these are rank 8 complex matrices. But I am working only with real Hadamard matrices. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematics)
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 90 | Re: nobody is perfect -
03-21-2007, 12:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The director of the learning center where I work as a parttime math instructor gave me an internet printout yesterday, announcing the successful mapping of a mathematical structure known as E8. Few minutes ago searching the site at Wikipedia, I realized that these are rank 8 complex matrices. But I am working only with real Hadamard matrices. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematics) | Tried the link,but could not gain access,what exactly is the significance of this find
Antonio?
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You | | | |
