Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: omega minus

  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    omega minus

    It is the only baryon that is made of three strange quarks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_quark with a spin of 3/2 http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/history/Omega-minus.asp and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_particle. Its hyperactive characteristics prompted scientists to name it as one of the hyperons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperon, like its leptonic counterparts of muons and tauons, the omega minus does not participate in atomic or molecular formations. Why this is so remains a mystery in high-energy physics.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    It is the only baryon that is made of three strange quarks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_quark with a spin of 3/2 http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/history/Omega-minus.asp and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_particle. Its hyperactive characteristics prompted scientists to name it as one of the hyperons http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperon, like its leptonic counterparts of muons and tauons, the omega minus does not participate in atomic or molecular formations. Why this is so remains a mystery in high-energy physics.
    I have glanced through the links,however,there is another "strangeness" factor at work
    here,besides the quarks names,and that is,as has been noticed by many working in the
    field of particle research,that of predicting a particle,then it mysteriously appears! It
    would seem to me,that if I predicted an Antonio,and a Michael particle,they would appear?

    It would seem that consciousness is deeply linked into all outcomes of this research.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    It would seem that consciousness is deeply linked into all outcomes of this research.
    In physics, the closest concept analogous to consciousness is the concept of field, a form and structure of space and time having infinite degrees of freedom.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    In physics, the closest concept analogous to consciousness is the concept of field, a form and structure of space and time having infinite degrees of freedom.

    Thats right a field of consciousness,where the mind can not only predict a particle,it can
    create one as well!



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Thats right a field of consciousness
    The fields of physics possess mass and energy, in fact infinite mass and energy. However, what happened to all the mass and energy of consciousness?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The fields of physics possess mass and energy, in fact infinite mass and energy. However, what happened to all the mass and energy of consciousness?
    It lies there awaiting a claiming illumanant,who has awoken from his slumber?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    It lies there awaiting a claiming illumanant
    You know it lies there. I know it lies there. Who knows it lies there. Everybody knows it lies there. However, nobody knows how to get it from there to here. But there is one thing that bothers me most is that why small object weighs more than big object in the physics of high-energy?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    You know it lies there. I know it lies there. Who knows it lies there. Everybody knows it lies there. However, nobody knows how to get it from there to here. But there is one thing that bothers me most is that why small object weighs more than big object in the physics of high-energy?
    Prehaps because high-energy equates with greater compactness-hence heavier,the smaller ones are collapsed bigger ones?


    regards michael
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    greater compactness-hence heavier
    What is being compacted must be some higher power of energy.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 895x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: omega minus

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    What is being compacted must be some higher power of energy.

    Prehaps the more focussed the energy is,the more compacted is its flow,hence it
    is heavier because the current is denser,and the will is purer?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. omega principle
    By AntonioLao in forum General Philosophy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-03-2007, 06:57 PM
  2. The Omega Point/A White Hole in Time
    By Tesla in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 09:22 PM
  3. Omega Point vs Curie Point
    By AntonioLao in forum Relativity
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-08-2006, 08:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top