[RascalPuff]

"... we could be mislead into thinking that it's waves
are physical realities".

"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron ('disturbed area') in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation." - JWN Sullivan, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE, p.p. 103.

"Obviously matter is not expanding".

"These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely".
- J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science, pp. 103 & 104

"by now itwould havespread indefinitely".

(Refer Total Field Theory, Gravity is the 4th D., by K. B. Robertson
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie.)

[RascalPuff]

Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared. - Today, 09:36 PM



"... we could be mislead into thinking that it's waves
are physical realities".

"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron ('disturbed area') in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation." - JWN Sullivan, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE, p.p. 103.

"Obviously matter is not expanding".

"These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely".
- J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science, pp. 103 & 104

"by now itwould havespread indefinitely".

(Refer Total Field Theory, Gravity is the 4th D., by K. B. Robertson
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie.)

[RascalPuff]

Excerpt from an email about Total Field Theory, by K. B. Robertson

...there is no ‘new energy’ required to sustain the proposed 4-dimensionally expanding-accelerating physical universe: it is the omnidirectional expansion from the centers of all so called ‘particles’ (charges of electromagnetism having no distinct, discontinuous surfaces or boundaries) distributed over an increasing - inverse square - structured space.

In a 4-D continuum of accelerating expansion, all material enlargement remains relatively uniform. Yesterdays physical-spatial universe was smaller and denser as compared to today’s.

Today’s is larger and less dense when compared to yesterdays, but smaller and more dense when compared to tomorrow’s: ad infinitum.... (squared).

The operative words here are ‘when compared to’; whereas, today’s space-time cannot literally be compared with that of yesterday, nor can tomorrow’s values of space-time be compared with today’s. Still, we may know with confidence that an ongoing accelerating expansion prevails by way of the geometric definition for physical dimensions, and Einstein’s 1916 General Theory which finds the entire physical as well as spatial universe, 4 dimensional.

Densities from one moment to the next in such prevailing expansion, remain relatively uniform in whatever four dimensionally expanding ‘coordinate system’ (frame of reference)...

We may know that the (Newton’s - ‘repelling or impelling’) 4-D alternative (contraction at right angles to three dimensional entities, or expansion at right angles to three dimensional entities) is one of expansion, since objects released above the earth’s surface (or any major gravitational mass) ‘fall downward’ (whereas, in a contracting 4-D universe, such released objects would ‘fall upward’, as the contracting major gravitational mass diminished, became smaller, fell away from a released test object).

We know the expansion to be accelerating because ‘descending objects’ (appear to) accelerate to the earth’s surface; whereas, because Einstein proved the physical as well as spatial universe to be expanding, we know that the collective coordinate system earth - 24,000 miles in diameter - is accelerating upward to overtake and strike the apparently descending test object, the motion of the entire frame of reference creating the illusion that the apple falls from A to B, rather than the entire frame of reference - coordinate system - accelerating from B to A.

There is never any more or less energy in the physically expanding universe, nullifying any question of ‘where is the energy coming from?’. All we need know is that it is a given amount of fnite material energy, exhibiting measurable accelerating expansion - maintaining the same relative - space-time - density, distributed in the value of the inverse square: squared...

If a given test object - say your computer keyboard - stopped being four dimensional (perhaps due to unprecedented subjection to Absolute Zero degrees Kelvin <cessation of all motion: molecular, atomic and subatomic> - yet - if ever - to be achieved), your keyboard would then be likely to become three dimensional - non expanding - while surrounded by an ever expanding/accelerating 4-D universe; wherein your keyboard would become as small and dense as the 4-D universe became uniformly large and tenuous around it; forever: squared (refer ‘Black Hole Singularities’ - unprecedented, comprehensive, non mathematical explanations for stuff like that...).

Best regards, Rascal Puff

[mkirkpatrick]

Many names cause confusion,hence one is continually chasing the tail of the other,there is
but energy motioned by intent,there is no more-period.One energy universal,ubquitous.

You can "pull" whatever names you care to invent out of it,electron,photon,or even a futon?But all you really have is ONE energy-period.




regards michael.