It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > General Physics
Reload this Page Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared.
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared.
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,423
Thanks Given: 85
Thanked 73x in 69 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared. - 05-06-2007, 09:36 PM

"... we could be mislead into thinking that it's waves
are physical realities".

"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron ('disturbed area') in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation." - JWN Sullivan, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE, p.p. 103.

"Obviously matter is not expanding".

"These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely".
- J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science, pp. 103 & 104

"by now itwould havespread indefinitely".

(Refer Total Field Theory, Gravity is the 4th D., by K. B. Robertson
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie.)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared.
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,423
Thanks Given: 85
Thanked 73x in 69 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared. - 05-06-2007, 09:54 PM

Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared. - Today, 09:36 PM



"... we could be mislead into thinking that it's waves
are physical realities".

"As long as we are considering an individual electron, we could be mislead into thinking that its waves are physical realities. Each electron ('disturbed area') in fact demands a 3-Dimensional Space to itself. This makes it obvious that these waves are merely a mathematical phantom; consequently it is profoundly disconcerting to find that experiment confirms their existence. The apparent congruity between calculation and experiment must be in some sense illusory. It is extremely difficult to avoid the conclusion that the experiments and their results have yet to receive their proper interpretation." - JWN Sullivan, THE LIMITATIONS OF SCIENCE, p.p. 103.

"Obviously matter is not expanding".

"These disturbed areas which are discovered to demand 3-Dimensions of Space indicate the position of the electron; yet we cannot state that the disturbed area is the electron. Because any such locality has a tendency to spread, and if the matter of the universe were a number of disturbed areas, by now it would have spread indefinitely".
- J.W.N. Sullivan, The Limitations of Science, pp. 103 & 104

"by now itwould havespread indefinitely".

(Refer Total Field Theory, Gravity is the 4th D., by K. B. Robertson
http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie.)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared.
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Aka the White Mongol
RascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura aboutRascalPuff has a spectacular aura about
 
RascalPuff's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,423
Thanks Given: 85
Thanked 73x in 69 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rep Power: 20
   
Awards Showcase
2nd Place - Monthly Theme Quiz 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared. - 05-06-2007, 11:05 PM

Excerpt from an email about Total Field Theory, by K. B. Robertson

...there is no ‘new energy’ required to sustain the proposed 4-dimensionally expanding-accelerating physical universe: it is the omnidirectional expansion from the centers of all so called ‘particles’ (charges of electromagnetism having no distinct, discontinuous surfaces or boundaries) distributed over an increasing - inverse square - structured space.

In a 4-D continuum of accelerating expansion, all material enlargement remains relatively uniform. Yesterdays physical-spatial universe was smaller and denser as compared to today’s.

Today’s is larger and less dense when compared to yesterdays, but smaller and more dense when compared to tomorrow’s: ad infinitum.... (squared).

The operative words here are ‘when compared to’; whereas, today’s space-time cannot literally be compared with that of yesterday, nor can tomorrow’s values of space-time be compared with today’s. Still, we may know with confidence that an ongoing accelerating expansion prevails by way of the geometric definition for physical dimensions, and Einstein’s 1916 General Theory which finds the entire physical as well as spatial universe, 4 dimensional.

Densities from one moment to the next in such prevailing expansion, remain relatively uniform in whatever four dimensionally expanding ‘coordinate system’ (frame of reference)...

We may know that the (Newton’s - ‘repelling or impelling’) 4-D alternative (contraction at right angles to three dimensional entities, or expansion at right angles to three dimensional entities) is one of expansion, since objects released above the earth’s surface (or any major gravitational mass) ‘fall downward’ (whereas, in a contracting 4-D universe, such released objects would ‘fall upward’, as the contracting major gravitational mass diminished, became smaller, fell away from a released test object).

We know the expansion to be accelerating because ‘descending objects’ (appear to) accelerate to the earth’s surface; whereas, because Einstein proved the physical as well as spatial universe to be expanding, we know that the collective coordinate system earth - 24,000 miles in diameter - is accelerating upward to overtake and strike the apparently descending test object, the motion of the entire frame of reference creating the illusion that the apple falls from A to B, rather than the entire frame of reference - coordinate system - accelerating from B to A.

There is never any more or less energy in the physically expanding universe, nullifying any question of ‘where is the energy coming from?’. All we need know is that it is a given amount of fnite material energy, exhibiting measurable accelerating expansion - maintaining the same relative - space-time - density, distributed in the value of the inverse square: squared...

If a given test object - say your computer keyboard - stopped being four dimensional (perhaps due to unprecedented subjection to Absolute Zero degrees Kelvin <cessation of all motion: molecular, atomic and subatomic> - yet - if ever - to be achieved), your keyboard would then be likely to become three dimensional - non expanding - while surrounded by an ever expanding/accelerating 4-D universe; wherein your keyboard would become as small and dense as the 4-D universe became uniformly large and tenuous around it; forever: squared (refer ‘Black Hole Singularities’ - unprecedented, comprehensive, non mathematical explanations for stuff like that...).

Best regards, Rascal Puff
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Re: Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared.
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,201
Thanks Given: 335
Thanked 617x in 591 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile Re: Reality is Dismissed for Lack of Evidence. Squared. - 05-07-2007, 06:36 AM

Many names cause confusion,hence one is continually chasing the tail of the other,there is
but energy motioned by intent,there is no more-period.One energy universal,ubquitous.

You can "pull" whatever names you care to invent out of it,electron,photon,or even a futon?But all you really have is ONE energy-period.




regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) Version 6.0 mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 2 02-08-2008 03:59 AM
Introduction to 'The Sentient-Centered Theory Of Metaphysics' (SCTOM) mjgeddes Your TOE Theory 10 02-03-2008 06:44 AM
Tuesday Evening, An Elementary Dialogue Neri Philosophy Articles 11 07-26-2007 02:27 PM
The Mathematico-Cognition Reality Theory (MCRT) mjgeddes TOE Theory Articles 11 02-10-2006 09:08 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com