Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    dipole near and far

    Given a current loop, the quantity IA is called the magnetic dipole moment (M) where I is the electric current flowing in the loop and A is the area enclosed by the loop. This is called the far-field approximation. Classically, magnetic flux density generated by the loop depends only on the area and not on its shape: M = IA.

    On the other hand, if a magnetic dipole experiences an infinitesimal near local turning force (torque) in a non-uniform or time-varying magnetic field then the magnetic dipole moment is defined as the ratio of the torque (T) over the magnetic flux density (B): M = T/B. It is then logical that the far-field approximation is the integral of the near-field equation IA = T/B. As a classical experimental constant, B can be taken outside the integral: T = IAB. Torque is defined as the vector cross product of the radius vector r and a local infinitesimal force F: T = r × F. Since r× F = - F× r, two possible distinct orientations exist such that quantized torque is made equivalent to quantized spin. Although torque is a vector, the scalar inner dot product of torque is equivalent to a square of energy.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: dipole near and far

    An interesting description Antonio,you certainly know what you are torqueing about?

    Are not all dipoles connected by an unversal energy field,where near and far does not
    apply?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: dipole near and far

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Are not all dipoles connected by an unversal energy field,where near and far does not apply
    Dipoles (electric or magnetic) exist due to broken symmetries. I am thinking that quadrupoles should be able to restore symmetry. Once restored then they are all connected into a universal energy field.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: dipole near and far

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Dipoles (electric or magnetic) exist due to broken symmetries. I am thinking that quadrupoles should be able to restore symmetry. Once restored then they are all connected into a universal energy field.

    Symmetry needs to be restored,or else there be chaos?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,778
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: dipole near and far

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    Symmetry needs to be restored,or else there be chaos
    According to Standard Model of elementary particles, they are all derived from spontaneous broken symmetries via the Higgs mechanism.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,619
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    295
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile Re: dipole near and far

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    According to Standard Model of elementary particles, they are all derived from spontaneous broken symmetries via the Higgs mechanism.
    There is something missing here! Need to put my finger on it?



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top